Argument Essay: 11 Facts About Animal Testing

Animal testing is the inhumane act of using conscious, innocent animals to test products without care of what the aftermath may be. According to PETA, the largest animal rights organization in the world, more than 100 million animals are slaughtered in U.S. laboratories every year. Those who have the heart to inflict this type of brutality do this by immobilizing them in restraint devices for hours, in order to drill holes into their skulls and have their spinal cords crushed (PETA). Along with the physical atrocities that humans are forcing these vulnerable animals into, humans are also isolating them from their own kind, confining them in barren cages, and thus traumatizing them for the rest of their lives. Those who possess an ounce of compassion

According to one of the largest organizations for social change with 4.3 million members: Do Something, the article “11 Facts About Animal Testing” states, “92% of experimental drugs that are safe and effective in animals fail in human clinical trials because they are too dangerous or don’t work.” Even after scientists force innocent animals into excruciating pain, the results are proven to be meaningless. This delineates how impractical animal testing is. By the same token, according to Pro-Con, a nonprofit public charity that provides research on more than 50 controversial topics, “Paul Furlong, Professor of Clinical Neuroimaging at Aston University (UK), states that ‘it's very hard to create an animal model that even equates closely to what we're trying to achieve in the human.’” This demonstrates how distinct animals and humans are and proves we should not use animals as a representation people. Hence, animal testing is an ineffective

Pro-Con shares how animals are being treated in the Draize Acute Toxicity test. The supposed reason for this experiment is to see if there is irritation caused by shampoos or other cosmetic products. The test involves “…scientists using clips to hold a rabbit's eyelid open for multiple days, so they cannot blink when products are being tested” (Pro-Con). This barbaric process results in hemorrhaging and blindness. If humans would not think twice about putting their children in cages, infecting them with diseases and leaving them untreated, then they should not consider doing that to animals either. Correspondingly, Pro-Con states, “Discriminating against animals because they do not have the cognitive ability, language, or moral judgment that humans do is no more justifiable than discriminating against human beings with severe mental impairments.” This depicts how animals should be considered with just as much as respect and dignity as humans. Therefore, we have no right to inflict cruelty on something that deserves to be on the earth just as much as humans