Argumentative Essay: Does Poverty Cause Domestic Violence?

Michel Foucault indicates that power is not placed in any one group but exists in all social relationships Macionis j, j, AND PLUMMER k (2012). Zlatka Rakovec-Felser (2014) argues that domestic violence is related to the society, that is imitated within the type of behaviors and attitudes toward women. This shows how men’s are often considered as being controlling. Therefore, Poverty does not cause violence because domestic abuse can affect women in all social classes. WIDOM, CATHY SPATZ (1989) considered that Parents who physically neglect children may increase the risk of raising violent children. According to WIDOM, CATHY SPATZ (1989) abused and neglected had higher rates of having adult criminal records. This reveals how poverty is not

Peer relationships can be the cause of socialization which can have a big impact on children lifestyle. He conveys that living in a disadvantaged society can influence children to make choices in society. Therefore, poverty is not the cause, however; violent behavior in children is an outcome of social influence within the society. David J. Harding(2009) states that Poverty is not the cause of violent but children who are often mistreated by violence can be misguided to neighborhood violence. Jeremy Staff and Derek A. Kreager (2008) indicates how poverty is not the cause, however, peer place in children is clearly linked with school achievement. He considered that deprived children are often able to gain some forms of peer place through violence and association in violent groups. Consequently, deprived children of high status in violent groups are at greater risks of high school dropout than other children. As a result, to fit in a specific social group, children will imitate violent behavior within society so they are accepted and respected by their peers. This displays how socialization and peer groups form children’s behavior as they will influence children to be involved in violent

Socialization theory indicates the importance of special relationships that exist between children, families and also the society. Socialization theory highlights family and society because of the main base of impact on children’s behaviors. Bronfenbrenner ecological theory (1979) highlights how important the environment is for children’s social development. The child is the center of the ecological system whereas the layers of the surroundings are becoming wider. Bronfenbrenner highlights that the development outcome is often influenced by the overall background of the child. He believed that the surroundings during which the child is raised and therefore the interaction of the child are as a result of the development. He believes that the surroundings are vital for children’s social development. Ines Blažević1 (2016) This shows how Interactions within the microsystem usually involve personal relationships with family members, practitioners, and the society. How these groups interact with children can have an effect on however these children grow Wyness (2012). Additional encouragement, understanding interactions and relationships can increase the child’s development. However, Children will follow the wrong crowd which will encourage them to take part in criminal activities. Bronfenbrenner agrees with this as he highlights that once children grow everything within the child’s surroundings can have an