ipl-logo

Argumentative Essay Federalism

944 Words4 Pages

Federalism Federalism is a system of government in which power is divided between federal government, state government and provinces government. While federalism has many benefits, among them is checks and balances between the federal and state government, thus reducing the chances of one party getting too powerful and abusing their power. Preventing one party from being too powerful and abusing their powers is a good thing. However, it comes with a price that federal and provinces (state and local) governments do not always see eye to eye and agree with each other, which turns into conflict. An issue such as medical marijuana, the federal government allows states to make and enforce laws in their own states. States such as Washington, California, …show more content…

However, this ruling does not overturn a state law such as California to allow medical marijuana in their state. However, it does mean that people who have an illness such as Larry Harvey are at risk of being sued by the federal agencies including Drug Enforcement Administration. The Bush administration has been against legalizing medical marijuana, Justice Paul Stevens of the Bush administration has been emphasizing against marijuana stating “unscrupulous physicians” might exploit the broadly worded California law to make marijuana and sell it. On the other hand, California Attorney General Bill Lockyer emphasized that ill citizens of California will continue to grow medical marijuana ignoring the risk of arrest and prosecution under federal law. Attorney General Bill Lockyer said “shows the vast philosophical difference between the federal government and Californians on the rights of patients to have access to the medicine they need to survive and lead healthier lives.” Many citizens of California such as Robert Raich, Angel Raich and Diane Monson who support medical marijuana hoped their voice and the voice of people who support medical marijuana be heard in Congress. Diane Monson for example, was prescribed medical marijuana because of her lower back pain. On the same topic, Angel Raich was prescribed medical marijuana because without it, she would lose her appetite and die from a “wasting syndrome.” Angel Raich said “I don’t know how to explain it, I just can’t swallow without

Show More
Related
414 Words | 2 Pages

The Case Against Marijuana Gonzales v. Raich In Gonzales v. Raich the legal issue facing the court is whether Congress has the power, through Article I Section 8 of the Constitution, to “prohibit the local cultivation and use of marijuana in compliance with California law.” The 1996 Proposition 215, now codified as the Compassionate Use Act of 1996, was created to ensure ill residents of California had access to medicinal marijuana. The 1996 Act is relevant to this 2005 case because it is important to the eventual dispute before the court.

Read More
505 Words | 3 Pages

In January 2008, Alburquerque implemented a new green building code that included energy efficiency requirements for air conditioners, furnaces, heat pumps and water heaters that were more stringent than U.S. Department of Energy requirements. The legislation prompted a group of heating, ventilation and air conditioning and water heating equipment trade organizations, contractors and distributors to sue the City to stop the new requirements from taking effect on the grounds that the federal Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975, National Appliance Energy Conservation Act and other federal laws preempt the City’s new building code provisions related to energy efficiency and the City did not have a waiver of preemption from the federal government. Specifically, Plaintiffs argued that they would be harmed by the new legislation because sorting through conflicting standards will cause confusion and complying with conflicting standards will increase equipment costs causing consumers to repair rather than replace equipment and driving up the cost of new homes and other projects. As a general matter, it is well-established that a federal law that conflicts with a state law will “preempt” the state law if Congress intended, either expressly or implicitly, to preempt the state law.

Read More
729 Words | 3 Pages

Federalism is a system of government used in the United States that divides power between the National and State governments. The U.S. constitution gives power to both the states, and the federal government, but the states cannot directly contradict the constitution. This makes it so that the broader issues are handled by the federal government, and the smaller, more local problems, go to the states. Sometimes, they must work together in order to make big things happen. A good example of this is the 1st article of the constitution.

Read More
1500 Words | 6 Pages

Before exploring whether the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists can be labelled as either liberal or republican, it must be noted that both sides often employed the rhetorique of the other as a way to strengthen their arguments. This also helped both sides win support for their arguments from their opposition. I posit that the Federalists were more republican in their beliefs while the Anti-Federalists were more liberal based on a closer exploration of the creation of a federated state, in which the main tenets of republicanism and liberalism were defended by the respective factions. An argument that encapsulates the idea of the Federalists having strong republican leanings would be their focus on collective rights over individual ones in the creation of a republic.

Read More
442 Words | 2 Pages

Federalism has evolved since its beginning within our government and has effected how are governments works. The power of states vs. the power of the national government was a major concern of the american people, so much so that the rights that each one has were written into our constitution. In the beginning this idea of federalism started out as what is known as "Dual Federalism". The National government worked almost completely separate from the states, similar to working in "their own little worlds". There was no shared authority or cooperation between levels of government.

Read More
716 Words | 3 Pages

Although your article does a great job analyzing the medical advantages of marijuana in order to possibly change current statues to legalize medical marijuana, it is important to also analyze how our political structure separating federal law from state law conflicts and focuses on personal views to influence legislation rather than work

Read More
2067 Words | 9 Pages

In the United States, several states have already legalized marijuana for recreational or medicinal use, with federal legalization becoming increasingly feasible. The economic benefits of legalizing marijuana, along with the growing body of research supporting its medical value, make it a compelling case for regulation. In conclusion, the ban on marijuana was a product of fear, misinformation, and vested interests that have had detrimental consequences for society. Instead of criminalizing marijuana, it should have been regulated in a manner that prioritized public health, safety, and social justice.

Read More
518 Words | 3 Pages

If we do not win this debate, our liberation from Great Britain would have been pointless. I support the Antifederalist for this exact reason. We need a Bill Of Right to protect us from the government crushing hand. The Federalist want us to go along with a promise! Just a set of pretty words and an system of checks and balances!

Read More
628 Words | 3 Pages

Thus, the federal government should not have raided the Los Angeles Cannabis Center. It is not clear what was the Drug Enforcement Administration's the motive was for raiding the center. Several other states had approved the initiative and they were not questioned or raided by the federal government. According to Peter Warren, a spokesman for the California Medical Association, ''federal and state law enforcement authorities have no business interfering with the doctor-patient relationship". Warren supports using medical marijuana to help patients because many medical treatments have failed to provide necessary pain relief for patients.

Read More
543 Words | 3 Pages

Not only is there a federal government, but there are also state and local governments. Furthermore, there are forms of government that function on a higher basis than local governments, but on a lower basis than state governments. Although the federal government has overall control on how the country functions, the other forms of government have a considerable impact on the laws of each area. All states have varying laws that lie along the same lines. For instance, the age to get a Driver’s license is not the same from state to state, but they are around the same age.

Read More
734 Words | 3 Pages

Back in the early twentieth century, marijuana was mainly used for medical purposes in the US. Now, both it 's recreational and medical use is increasingly being consumed by the population and the tendency is to continue increasing. Much has been said about the use of marijuana as a solution to different health problems, and although not everything that is said is true, it cannot be ignored that marijuana can help in the treatment of some cases of adult patients. CNN’s chief medical correspondent, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, was opposed to the medicinal use of cannabis. Based on his knowledge as a neurologist, he was convinced that the drug was dangerous and had dismissed its supposed therapeutic benefits.

Read More
337 Words | 2 Pages

Federalism is a method of government that allows two or more entities to share control over the same region. Each person in the United States has their own role into the laws of that city, county, state and federal government. The power is divided between the national government and other governmental units. In the U.S, the powers are distributed between the states and the national government. The difference between their powers are mainly based on jurisdiction.

Read More
1281 Words | 6 Pages

Over time the government has been able to transform the system into what they believe may be beneficial for the country. Although federalism has differed over time, it still has not given America full democracy or equality. There are aspects that are conducted by both the federal and state governments, such as taxes. Both the federal and states have their own affairs in which they have control. The federal government deals with aspects such as war with foreign countries, while states deal with aspects such as licensing.

Read More
1178 Words | 5 Pages

Today the demands are changing in different states. In States such as Colorado and Washington, marijuana has been legalized for recreational use. This move raised several questions as far as decriminalization of marijuana is concerned. Besides portraying the US in a bad light, legalization of marijuana for recreation increases the risk of developing mental problems, increases government expenditure on public health, jeopardizes the future of children, and is a gateway to other dangerous drugs. Increased health problems and public health expenditure-

Read More
1693 Words | 7 Pages

In the past decade, a number of movements to legalize the use of marijuana has been gaining momentum. According to the 2016 Gallup survey, a record high 60% of Americans say that marijuana should be legalized and this figure marks a 9% increase compared to 2014. Support for legalizing marijuana was 31% in 2000, 50% in 2016 before reaching 60% last year. This shows that despite government efforts to eliminate its use, marijuana is becoming more popular. It is clear that

Read More

More about Argumentative Essay Federalism

Open Document