Argumentative Essay: History Of Art In Secondary Schools

There has been increasing push for STEM (Science, Technology, Engineer, and Math) subjects in school, as it is perceived to be the key to a good career. Since subjects available in schools are limited, most secondary schools have abandoned History of Art because it is perceived to be unnecessary.
These schools rationalize that students could take an abundant of art courses (including the history of art) of their choosing at the University, but Rosie Millard argues against this. She explains that students who do not take History of Art in secondary school are less likely to take them in the University.
Millard asserts that the importance of History of Art is equal to that of any STEM subject to the society. Using her experience as an example,

‘AT&T (America’s largest telephone, the internet, and TV provider) is merging with Time Warner (which consists of CNN, HBO, TBS, TNT, and of course, Warner Brothers Studio), and the only thing delaying this is approval is the government, specifically the Department of Justice.
This merger is a $85 billion deal that when approved will bring a combining worth of $256-$300 billion, one of the largest mergers we have ever seen. The CEOs of both companies claim that the merger will be a benefit for all: it will create more competition and innovation and which according to the simple law of economics creates more supply, thus, lower prices.
Timothy Karr warns Americans of the hidden negative effect this merger will bring to the everyday user of both company services. Karr states that most have forgotten that AT&T and Time Warner will need to pay back the interest on their loans, and to do so, they will most likely hike the prices of their service. His reasoning is based on AT&T’s choice of acquiring DirecTV which resulted in the hike of price of cable tv and

The newly elected president of the US promised to return jobs to the American people by cutting down on activities that are perceived to be a hindrance on employment: offshoring and trade are part of these activities. Economists, however, disagree; they believe the real hindrance on jobs should be the advancing technology.
Although globalization is partially responsible for job loss in the country, technology is the bigger problem. However, it is easier to focus on globalization being the cause of unemployment, as there is no clear way to stop technology without losing the numerous benefits it provides to the country.
Many industries are losing their jobs to machines because machines are the perfect workers as their productivity is enhanced without the perceived problems that come with human employees: sick days, maternity leave, etc. For instance, the steel industry has lost 75 percent of its workforce, however, there was no decline in productivity; hence, more machines have replaced the workers. Similarly, 13 percent of manufacturing jobs have been lost to trade, but the rest have been to