E-cigarettes have positive affects that are less harmful for people to get cancer. Most people who use traditional cigarettes are exposed to toxins that cost health issues. This new technology was designed this device to imitate the feeling of smoking without the harmful effects. E-cigarettes have many positive affects that could be beneficial for the future and could also save hundreds of thousands of lives.
In the E-cigarettes article, the opponent argued that e-cigarettes offer a way to quit smoking tobacco cigarettes. There are one billion people who smoke cigarettes daily. Six million people die every year because of the use of tobacco. Oxford dictionaries states, “When smoking traditional cigarettes, users inhale smoke from the burning
…show more content…
“Democratic senators wrote a letter to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, grandfathering that the sale of these products would essentially undermine consumer protections.” (Supporter’s argument) The FDA’s strict regulations would reduce any risks of unsafe e-cigarettes. “There are likely hundreds of e-cigarette products on the market today without any regulatory review of their consequences for public health.” It is the government’s responsibility to protect consumers and ensure that products are safe to use.
In conclusion, e-cigarettes have been promoted as a safer alternative to traditional cigarettes and proven to help tobacco users quit smoking. Unlike traditional cigarettes, e-cigarettes do not produce harmful toxins that cause cancer. This new type of technology should be regulated by the Food and Drug Administration to ensure the product is safe for use during the manufacturing stages. It should also be sold to consumer’s who are qualified to purchase the product. E-cigarettes have many positive affects that could be beneficial for the future and could also save hundreds of thousands of