Gang crime, in particular joint enterprise offences are commonly linked with young BAME males. Yet, research by the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, reveals the ‘gang’ label is disproportionately attributed to BAME individuals. It is for this reason that joint enterprise law is viewed as racially discriminatory, and grassroots campaign, JENGBA, have conducted independent research supporting this argument. They represent at least 600 individuals currently serving joint enterprise convictions, and they claim that 80% of those are black. Evidently, there appears to be a racialised application of joint enterprise, explicitly stereotyping young BAME individuals as partaking in violent criminal and problematic behaviours. What is more, this label of ‘gang’ has been …show more content…
Yet, research by the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, reveals the ‘gang’ label is disproportionately attributed to BAME individuals. It is for this reason that joint enterprise law is viewed as racially discriminatory, and grassroots campaign, JENGBA, have conducted independent research supporting this argument. They represent at least 600 individuals currently serving joint enterprise convictions, and they claim that 80% of those are black. Evidently, there appears to be a racialised application of joint enterprise, explicitly stereotyping young BAME individuals as partaking in violent criminal and problematic behaviours. What is more, this label of ‘gang’ has been communicated within the courtroom instigating contentious debate, questioning the fairness of these trials. Gang crime, in particular joint enterprise offences are commonly linked with young BAME males. Yet, research by the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, reveals the ‘gang’ label is disproportionately attributed to BAME individuals. It is for this reason that joint enterprise law is viewed as racially discriminatory, and grassroots campaign, JENGBA, have conducted independent research supporting