On March 13, 1963, Ernesto Miranda arrested by the Phoenix Police Department, because of kidnapping and rape of an eighteen-year-old woman ten days earlier. After two hours of being interrogated by police officers, Ernesto signed a confession of rape charge on the forms that included the typed statement. “ I do hereby swear that I make this statement voluntarily and of own free will, with no threats, coercion, or promises of immunity, and with full knowledge of my legal rights, understanding any statement I make may be used against me”. Although, at no point did they present the Fifth Amendment to Miranda. Which he wasn 't informed "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be …show more content…
The statement will be involuntary, which in small words the evidence or justification will be thrown out the case. Court 's decision was 5-4, making Miranda innocent. This decision raised to what has now become the Miranda Warning. The judge ruled, because, of not having the Miranda rights said the evidence must be denied. Meaning, anything that Ernesto said was not or could not be count against you. Ernesto Miranda, was a very lucky men because of not having the Miranda rights said his case was a waist, unfortunately, for the victim nothing happened and is this was an affected case she also must have the right of being heard to prevent many things from this decision …show more content…
Legal law institute. Web. 3 March, 2016.
“Miranda v. Arizona”. Oyez. Web. 3 March, 2016.
“”Miranda” Rights and the Fifth Amendment”. FindLaw. 2016. Web. 3 March, 2016.
“Miranda v. Arizona Podcast”. Us courts. Web. 3 March,