There are, roughly 15% of females in combat and 85% of males are in combat in the United States. People are questioning whether or not to ostracize women from combat. . It is important for women to be given a chance to prove themselves in combat and neglected because of their gender. There are numerous suggestions that a woman could bring to the table, however, it would not be equitable to just turn a woman away, if they have a way to assist. Women are typically seen as weak or inferior to men, who enter combat. If women are prepared and allowed to enter combat, there should be no question of their abilities/strength to fight . To commence, females should not be excluded from combat just because they're female. When did being male gave a specific privileges that females cannot have? Females can do anything that males can do. In an article called Lifting Barriers Makes the Military, Stronger it states matters because if you want the best fares, you need to set aside things that don't matter— Like race, gender, sexual orientation— And focus on what does: competence and character." Women and male both should be judged on going into combat by their physical abilities and their personalities, not what they look like. …show more content…
If women are able to offer other ideas, then those ideas will be able to cause the military to strive. In an article called Lifting Barriers Makes the Military, Stronger it states no longer makes sense to divert a woman to a lesser job when she might be the combat officer who saves a platoon." This and means that if a woman has the ability to strive and become something powerful, with the ideas she can offer, she can do extraordinary