Although this plan is great for the economy, some might argue that there are certain repercussions that should be taken into consideration. For example, by making community college free, the program would cost $60 billion in the course of 10 years in a cost-sharing program with the states (Butler 1). Although this sounds like it’s a substantial amount of money, it is manageable. In regards to the benefits of the proposal, this is a small price to pay. In the long run it is better for the economy. As stated before, the proposal creates more job opportunities which encourage economic growth. In addition to the great aid the proposal offers economically, it also offers vast social prosperity. Many of the people attending community college are very ambitious and are very affable. The environment in a community college is very sociable which advocates a better education. There are many different people in community college including veterans, of marital and maternal status, and middle-aged men wanting to improve their employment prospects (Hanks). Hanks shows how diverse and ambitious the community college environment is. One might object that the efficiency of the student might decline because of how social the college is and how prone the students are to distractions at a community college. To some extent this is true however, President Obama’s proposal prevents this from …show more content…
Under matching is essentially students who have great academic proficiency and are capable of attending rigorous universities but choose not because of financial problems (Butler). Although it might seem as if the proposal would be adding more fuel to the fire by indirectly promoting to attend a community college it is irrelevant and doesn’t change anything. Going to a community college doesn’t mean they are denied the right to go to a challenging university. They still have the opportunity to attend later on in the