ipl-logo

Arguments Against Drug Decriminalization

1007 Words5 Pages

A country where all drugs are legalized can be the perfect economic and social compromise. Ultimately, it contains the both of best worlds as it would allow for the economy to flourish due to the infusion of new income from tax reforms. Drug liberalization is the next step for the United States for us to become a new country with limited violence less drug abuse and a better prison system. Drug liberalization needs to happen and happen fast for the progression of the people as a civilization. Portugal in 2001 decided to take the initiative to decriminalize all drugs within the country. Within the limitations as there are restrictions to how much is legally allowed to be carried. If we look at the statistic for which Portugal has benefited from, when we see the drug us that has continued into adulthood in 2001 it was about 45% to about 27% in 2012 which shows how the prevalence in today’s society. This statistic can show how the exposure to drugs …show more content…

So why not attack the problem at the fuse directly? The world could be totally different as we have lost so many potential world changers and future leaders due to our war on drugs. The difference is on the way and should happen soon. Now if we look at the not so obvious benefits of the decriminalization of all drugs. Imagine a society where medical offices are allowed to make strides in cancer as HIV we have already discussed would start to have a decreasing rate in the reduction of needle sharing within society. We would also be promoting small business as a lot of dispensaries for certain drugs would start to open up giving struggling families a new source of income. We also would be able to reduce the income tax in America as we now have a greater source of revenue for the government which allows for the consumers to keep their hard-earned dollar to put back into our market to help us advance economically. The United

Show More
Related
1471 Words | 6 Pages

Randy E. Bartnett claims that “drug laws cause more harm to addicts and society than drugs themselves.” According to Bartnett, “Drug prohibition makes drugs so expensive, the addicts trying to crime in order to obtain money to buy them. Furthermore, drug prohibition is unfair in that it punishes users for committing a “crime” that has no victim.” Some people might agree with the idea that legalizing drugs would benefit addicts because then they would not be able to obtain drugs so easily.

Read More
499 Words | 2 Pages

Overall, Gore Vidal’s argument of legalizing drugs is very compelling. The style of writing is unique and keeps the reader interested. Vidal takes a popular argument (in 2016) and provides a sound argument in support of

Read More
727 Words | 3 Pages

The White House states, "In July 2001, Portugal decriminalized the personal use and possession of all illicit drugs" (Drugs in Portugal). Life in Portugal is free; this freedom allows

Read More
1222 Words | 5 Pages

Proponents of drug legalization, such as myself, argue that it could have a number of societal benefits. For one thing, it may help to reduce the number of weak addicts by making drugs more widely available and less valuable. As a result, employers would no longer have to worry about hiring people with drug addictions, potentially leading to a more competitive job market. Furthermore, legalization might contribute to economic growth by generating new jobs in the drug industry and money through taxes and regulations.

Read More
585 Words | 3 Pages

It is shocking to see that although we have already tried this approach we are trying it again. The similarities between the prohibition of alcohol and the war on drugs is something that can not be denied. Much like today, in the 1920’s you could see a raise in the population of people who went to prison, organise crime, and the amount of people who actually use the drugs. People lost their jobs because of alcohol just like people lose their jobs because of drugs. People found new ways to get alcohol just like today people found new ways to get their hands on drugs.

Read More
673 Words | 3 Pages

Drug production and dealing would be taken over by the government. The quality of drugs would be improved, their distribution wider, and profits would be higher, providing more capital for the

Read More
1126 Words | 5 Pages

If governments worldwide do not look at the facts and realize that to solve the epidemic of drug abuse they have to also focus on the mental factors that cause the addictions to occur, then this problem will just keep growing. The effect of things as they are is already destroying millions of peoples lives worldwide and putting an added strain onto the economy. If governments do not come together and fix this problem urgently, then it will never go

Read More
1089 Words | 5 Pages

Selling and distributing the drug would still be a criminal offense. It could mean rehabilitation, a fine of however much the state decides on the convicted, this means less incarceration for drug users and addicts. Countries such as the Netherlands, Switzerland, England and Italy have controlled both drugs and crime, whereas in the United States harshly punitive programs have increased the supply of both crime and drug use. Considering these harsh consequences, this is part of the reason why so many are incarcerated in the U.S. 46.2% of the population of people incarcerated at the moment is for drug offenses.

Read More
461 Words | 2 Pages

Prohibition was a period of 13 years in U.S. history in which the manufacture, sale, and transportation of liquor was made illegal from 1920 to 1933. It was known as the “Noble Experiment” and led to the first and only time an Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was repealed. There were many reasons for why prohibition was introduced, one was that a ban on alcohol would practically boost supplies of important grains such as barley. Another was, when America entered the war in 1917, the national mood turned against drinking alcohol.

Read More
115 Words | 1 Pages

I also thought it was interesting how people still found a way to bring alcohol into the U.S. and make money off of it even though it was illegal. I suppose it is not that surprising though, since one of the videos mentioned how alcohol was very important in customs of a variety of ethnic groups. I especially liked reading about the company in California telling their customers how to turn grape juice into wine. I wonder if the details were clearly written in a caution note on the packaging. Or I wonder if it was concealed, but still written so that if found by prohibitionists the company could say it was another caution

Read More
657 Words | 3 Pages

Drug prohibition, is a term rarely attached with a negative connotation for many Americans. Its failure has sparked some debate in the last fifty years, however, the ignorance about illegal substances has led to little discussion on alternatives. Legalizing all drugs is a better alternative than perpetuating the failed war on drugs. Alcohol prohibition has given us the opportunity to see the transformation of a once illegal drug become a legal and regulated substance. The 18th amendment of the constitution made alcohol consumption, distribution, and production illegal.

Read More
927 Words | 4 Pages

The United States should legalize drugs and tax them because it will save billions of dollars. legalized drug sales could be used to fund many government programs by collecting the taxes from it. The treatment programs can help users to get off drugs. Education programs can also prevent children and others

Read More
1629 Words | 7 Pages

Would the decriminalisation and / Legalisation of controlled substances improve or hinder the economic, health and social circumstances of drugs users, their families, communities and society? This essay will briefly outline the current policies on drugs in Ireland and will examine the policies and substance misuse from a European and international perspective; then it will discuss how decriminalisation of drugs and substances can improve or hinder the economic, health and social circumstances of drug users, their families, communities and society in general. Examples of controlled substances in Ireland include cocaine, heroin, methadone, cannabis (full list of controlled substances found in the schedule Misuse of Drugs Act 1977).

Read More
305 Words | 2 Pages

To be honest I think the “War on Drugs” has been a losing battle for decades. If you look at our history during 1960s and Vietnam War time frame you will notice drug use became a popular norm within society. President Nixon was the first to declare war on drugs in 1971-1972, but Presidents Carter, Reagan and even Clinton made proposals regarding drugs. Are text advises us that, “The War on Drugs reshaped the American correctional system (Collica & Furst, 2012, Sec. 4.3). Even with the drug laws constantly changing and getting tougher, criminals and drug offenders keep finding ways to design new drugs, grow, distribute and hide their business through various means.

Read More
1116 Words | 5 Pages

The historical lesson of prohibition proves that where a demand for an illegal substance exists, someone will supply it; efforts to ban the sale of alcoholic beverages failed because bootleggers and speakeasies sprang up overnight to satisfy the public's thirst. In the same way, we have seen that prohibition of drugs does not and cannot work. The public is apparently willing to pay almost any price for an illicit "high," and the amounts of money involved insure that suppliers will always be on hand to meet the demand, and there will always be police and customs agents willing to look the other way for a share of the profits. So even if legalization were extremely undesirable for other reasons, the simple fact that prohibition doesn't work would argue strongly for

Read More

More about Arguments Against Drug Decriminalization

Open Document