ipl-logo

Arguments Against Paying College Athletes

502 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Why college athletes should be paid

The Argument Against Paying College Athletes

The justification of attending college is to acquire professional training and skills, so why should college athletes be compensated? Paying college athletes more than the scholarships they already have is not a good idea. Even though college athletes should be paid because they don't have time to work, they shouldn't be paid because it could send a negative message to kids and high school students and they already got paid through their tuition, fees, and transportation. While it may inspire more children to participate in sports, it may also convey a negative message and misunderstand why they should do so. For instance, every child, regardless of talent, will grow up wanting to play football because they will be focused on the money. Then, the high school level will also demand compensation. College sports would be sending the message that it is acceptable to withhold additional funds and to pay only certain athletes. It will propagate a false belief about the benefits of sports for children. …show more content…

Furthermore, college athletes already receive superior services that exceed salary payments. Athletes should not be exempt because they receive more treatment and benefits than other students. Since, athletes receive more treatment and benefits than other students, they should not be exempt. College athletes are not held to the same standards as the elite universities, which provide the athletes with the best gyms to exercise in, free health insurance for injuries, transportation, food, and, most importantly, tuition, stated in the article “Athlete Reason Why They Shouldn’t Pay”, page 2. College athletes shouldn't be paid because the services they receive are already covered by a payment for a few year. A salary is neither necessary nor required for these excellent services. College athletes do not require additional support beyond what they already

Show More
Related
103 Words | 1 Pages

College schools provide for student athletes enough. They pay for everything provided for the the students whether it’s scholarships or playing in the school games. Through it all it really doesn’t matter if they (the athletes) get paid for, it’s the opportunity that the coaches and university give them to play on the

Read More
2239 Words | 9 Pages

The reasons college athletes should be paid is because although they have their scholarship; it typically does not pay for everything. Secondly other people make money off of the college athletes. And lastly college athletes do not have the time to get a decent job, or even a job at all. The NCAA does not allow athletes to be paid which

Read More
1678 Words | 7 Pages

Besides, it is too hard to find a fair way to pay these athletes and they are practically being paid through the scholarships they receive. Which gives them a great education for free while playing the sport they grew up loving. Not to mention, there is something about watching young people play a game and try their hardest to be the best they can be, without having the influence of money to drive them. With all of these things considered, college athletes should not be paid to play college

Read More
2997 Words | 12 Pages

Building on the financial disparities, another significant issue with paying athletes is because it takes away from the main priority of college. Paying college athletes undermines the primary purpose of higher education: academics. Colleges are institutions of learning first, and sports should come as a complement to this educational mission. An article that supports this is “Should College Athletes Be Paid,” which was published under Junior Scholastic, where they state: College sports provide hundreds of thousands of student athletes the opportunity to play the sports they love while getting the education and skills they need to succeed after college.

Read More
852 Words | 4 Pages

Should college athletes be paid it states that, “In the past 12 years, the money generated by the two sports has increased nearly 300%”, which means that with time, colleges are just earning more and more money while players aren’t being paid. Some people may argue that athletes shouldn’t be paid, because they are getting their scholarships paid for. In the article Pay to play: Should college athletes be paid it says how Athletes receive scholarships for $200,000 over 4 years. This is good for the players because scholarships can cost a heavy amount. Although, if I were Division one and I knew there was a great possibility of going to a professional league and the only reason as to why I am in that college is to get into the professional league, not for education.

Read More
282 Words | 2 Pages

Athletes need to get paid because they put in work on the team.” The N.C.A.A of amateurism in college athletics has come to border on farce” (YANKAH). Because college is to learn to get and education.

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

Collegiate sports help to provide universities with very large sums of money. So why do college athletes not receive a portion of this income? Krikor Meshefejian, author of “Pay to Play: Should College Athletes Be Paid?,”

Read More
1609 Words | 7 Pages

Lastly paying college football and basketball players would force them to stay in school longer and finish their degrees (Walch 1). Even the top prospected football and basketball are not guaranteed a career in their specific

Read More
517 Words | 3 Pages

College athletes staying pure to the game College athletes should not be paid to play, they should not be paid to play because it is something that they have to work for and in a way it would replace scholarships. College athletes already receive scholarships and they are meant to help them with their schooling and education, not to play sports. College athletes are also students and most of them will already receive scholarship from the college. The scholarship alone should be plenty of enough money for a student, to be paid more on top of that would just be ridiculous and unreasonable. For many young athlete, going to college to play the game you love is a once and a lifetime opportunity and privilege.

Read More
874 Words | 4 Pages

This is a big decision that could impact the lives of thousands nationwide and revolutionize sports as we know it. College athletes should not be paid because of the many benefits that come with being a student athlete and because it is not a realistic resolution. One reason college athletes should not be paid is because of the many benefits there already are to playing a collegiate sport. One being reduced or free admission also known as a scholarship. As the athletes receiving scholarships have a full ride through college their payment is in the form of education benefits as opposed to direct compensation.

Read More
2039 Words | 9 Pages

There could be controversy over the athlete's contract with the amount they are getting paid. Also, the kids that do not play sports might feel they are being treated unfairly because they do not get paid. College athletes get offered a full ride to a big ten college for free: “other kids have to get loans worth tons of money that they will have to pay back for the rest of their lives” (Bagaria and Birkenes). Paying these athletes would cause too many problems that the university doesn’t have time to deal with. College is a place that people decide to go to because they enjoy everything the campus has to offer and to get a degree.

Read More
773 Words | 4 Pages

College athletes have worked hard to be on their universities’ sports teams. But with money involved most of the athletes would work extra hard. For instance the article, “3 Reasons Why College Athletes Should Be Paid,” states, “When you pay student-athletes a share of what they contribute to the college sports programs, they’ll want to work harder and do better. Like you would work harder at a job you get paid for, student-athletes will work harder during practices and games.” This would be a “win-win,” situation for all universities because most likely, by working harder, college athletes would generate more money for the universities, along with more money for themselves.

Read More
1829 Words | 8 Pages

There is no reason to pay college athletes because they are students first and academics should be one’s first priority, they already receive their fair share in extras, many of the athletes receive financial help through athletic scholarships, and the NCAA is an amateur enterprise and no amateur athlete in any sport is paid. The main reason colleges exist is to allow people the chance to get an education and earn a degree. Student-athletes are no exception to this. Just as other students are involved in clubs or groups, athletes play sports. Those students are students first

Read More
1311 Words | 6 Pages

On the other side many people feel that the college athletes should get paid because they bring a lot of income to the school, their commitment in time to the school and sport, and they have a higher standard and rules when it comes to their academics. College athletes at the division I and II level already have a lot of pressure to play well and to win titles for their school. Many people feel that by paying the athletes that it will start to become more of a business rather than just a sport to play. By paying these athletes they will end up being required and expected to win games,

Read More
562 Words | 3 Pages

College sports are a multibillion-dollar industry that brings millions of fans in to watch their favorite teams or athletes play. Collegiate sports have always played a significant role in the U.S., and the debate as to whether college athletes should be paid or not has been ongoing for years. While many people believe that athletes should be paid for their hard work, as well as the significant amount of money they bring into the schools, many people also believe that they should not be paid. Although college athletes work hard, paying college athletes could lead to many negative consequences in the sport such as budget cuts in smaller income sports, athletes only playing for the money, and takes away the difference between amateur and professional athletes. Paying college athletes could lead to budget cuts in other sports or activities that don’t bring in as much money.

Read More

More about Arguments Against Paying College Athletes

Related Topics

Open Document