ipl-logo

Arguments Against Standardized Testing

1291 Words6 Pages

Standardized testing was supposed to be a new way to hold schools and states accountable for teaching students the right in information. It has become the overstaying house guess who that keeps leaving their wet socks on the bathroom floor, and it has been leaving that mess since 2001. Some parents are done with putting their children under pressure to be the same as their peers on these tests. Also, it makes students less motivated to learn when all they are learning about is tests, and it does not prepare them for college. Teachers need be focused on teaching students, not on making students the best test taker. Students need well round education, not more standardized testing from grownups who have never step inside a classroom before. Therefore, standardized testing should be more authentic and should reward progress to the induvial students. …show more content…

The act went effect when signed by President George W. Bush. The original intent of the No Child Left Behind Act was to hold states and schools to a higher standard in mathematics and reading. It also came with standardized testing which gave schools ratings basic on what student produced. It was supposed to give parents choice for their children. The testing made parents more aware of the school standing by the test. According to the NCLB act “In addition to helping ensure that no child lose the opportunity for a quality education because he or she is trapped in a failing school…” (2). What the government wanted to happen was that regardless of your background. The school districts are requiring to have AYP (Adequate Yearly progress) to evaluate the school and the district by the standardized testing. The act includes a grant that reward teachers. Whom students passed the standardized test. which is called the Teacher Quality state Grants (“The no”). The act only reward passing school with money from the

Show More
Related
1018 Words | 5 Pages

Bush. This act says that ¨congress requires states to test children's basic skills [in order] to qualify for federal funding¨ (Ravitch 106). To be clear, this law is just a reassurance of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, which started the regulation of math and reading tests for 3rd-8th grade and high school. When teachers administer these tests, the scores of the children are then brought to a political sense and are compiled together to see if a school will receive funding. The state government’s also provide funding for schools who teach the curriculum that they require them to.

Read More
779 Words | 4 Pages

Later the Improving America's Schools Act (IASA) forced ESEA to analyze the scores of students not just for achievement but to measure the pedagogical levels of teachers . However schools who did not perform at the desired level endure no consequences. This eventually led to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. No Child Left Behind (NCLB)

Read More
1325 Words | 6 Pages

According to the U.S. Department Education, NCLB give states and school districts “unprecedented flexibility” in how they chose to utilize federal education funds (Four Pillars of NCLB, 2004). The article Teachers’ Views on No Child Left Behind: Support for the Principles, Concerns about the Practices states, “…states can develop their own academic content standards, choose the tests they will administer, and specify the minimum scores students must obtain to be declared “proficient” (2010). The National Assessment of Educational Progress has stated to be considered “proficient”, “Students reaching this level have demonstrated competency over challenging subject matter, including subject-matter knowledge, application of such knowledge to real-world situations, and analytical skills appropriate to the subject matter”

Read More
833 Words | 4 Pages

The act would eliminate “adequate yearly progress”, which under No Child Left Behind, means utilizing standardized each year to determine whether students are proficient in reading and math. This testing often causes teachers to “teach to the test” and forces all children to learn at the same level, whether they are prepared to or not. The act also “empowers states to design school improvement strategies” by limiting federal intervention into underperforming schools by ending the School Improvement Grant Program (SIG). The SIG “contained four federally mandated school ‘turn-around’ models designed by the Obama Administration to prescribe the types of interventions states have to use to improve outcomes at underperforming schools.” The SSA eliminates the SIG program and allows states to put their own improvement strategies in

Read More
742 Words | 3 Pages

Standardized Testing While can be beneficial, standardized testing isn't improving American education. Standardized testing evaluates only the individual performance of a student instead of the overall growth of a student over the course of a year. In my opinion, Standardized testing is not enhancing education in America. Not all students who are smart and take in all the information test well. For instance, there are many people who simply do not perform well on tests.

Read More
1754 Words | 8 Pages

Standardized tests are started way too early in the school systems. "Students as young as 6 or 7 years old are now subjected to weeks of preparation for high stakes tests. Because math, reading, and to a lesser extent, science are the only subjects regularly tested, students are drilled in those topics." (Kumeh).

Read More
820 Words | 4 Pages

Just because an 8th grader might be said to be proficient at Mathematics in his state, it doesn’t mean that he/she will also be able to prove it in a test from a different state. Each and every state has a different standard, and as such, will demand so much from their students. The act’s highly flexible provisions have allowed states to make their tests “ordinary”, while others are actually trying to raise the bar for their alumni. To further affect these already inaccurate scores, non-English speakers are subjected to take the same exact tests as their peers. The proponents of No Child Left Behind thought that this would lead to the ESL program to improve itself in order to make the students learn English at a faster rate.

Read More
792 Words | 4 Pages

The "No Child Left Behind Act" (P. L. 107-110) is a federal act which establishes a regime of statewide achievement tests in reading or language arts, math, and science that states must follow in order to receive a grant under Title I, Part A of the act (USDOE). This Title I grant is the largest federal grant to states and local school districts for the education of disadvantaged children. States receive millions of dollars in annual funding for their schools which are tied to the requirements found within the "No Child Left Behind Act" (NCLBA). The tests the act requires compose the key components of the NCLBA standards and accountability framework. Test results provide the basis for measuring state, school district, and school progress

Read More
902 Words | 4 Pages

No Child Left Behind, a bill passed in 2002 which required all states to set goals and standard that would follow the guidelines of a national plan. The primary way to assure that all students met these goals was through a standardized test which would be administered once at the end of each school year, but the problem stands that standardized tests are an inadequate method of tracking the progress of students. In its current form standardized tests are designed to only measure proficiency in math, English, social studies, and science. As stated by Gerald W. Bracey, PhD "Standardized tests cannot measure qualities like creativity, critical thinking, resilience, motivation, persistence, curiosity, endurance, reliability, enthusiasm, empathy,

Read More
520 Words | 3 Pages

The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) act is a federal law passed in 2001 by George W. Bush. It stabilizes different reforms in all American public schools. One of its goals is to make sure all students from kinder to 12th grade are performing according to their grade level with the help of highly attentive teachers and yearly tests. It is also designed to improve student achievement and finally, to close gaps between students with different economic standards, race, ethnic backgrounds and also students with disabilities. Subsequently, in order to make sure students are fulfilling the standards the teachers and the school requires, they are given standard test to measure their progress.

Read More
935 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout the years, standardized testing has become something no student looks forward to. But, there might be deeper reasons as to why they despise it. Standardized tests have been around since the mid-1800s and have been used to measure a students' knowledge and ability to achieve their goals. However, as the year's progress, this form of testing has proven to cause problems. Students, teachers, and schools are all affected by standardized testing and its components in various ways.

Read More
679 Words | 3 Pages

The “No Child Left Behind” program is based off disadvantages from the lower class students who have less resources than upper class students. Mainly students that went to public schools make up the bigger percentage of the program. The NCLB act was passed by president Bush in 2001 requiring that all students must get tested in math in english in 3 and 8th grade and once in high school. The goal of the act was to make the test scores higher throughout the country. Students was given free tutoring due to the act passing.

Read More
595 Words | 3 Pages

The No Child Left Behind Act ensures that impoverished school systems are funded with the resources that they need to make sure that impoverished students are given a better chance to succeed. Schools are now being required to test students in grades 3 through 8 every year to measure students’ progress. The test is used to measure students’ progress in math and science. The student’s scores are not only compared district to district but also on a state and international

Read More
1660 Words | 7 Pages

President Bush signed the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 into law in early 2002. At first, it was used to determine whether or not a child needed extra help in their classes. Now standardized testing can determine whether or not a student graduates from high school. It is now under scrutiny, as some do not believe it is an effective way of testing students. Standardized testing does have its advantages, like giving teacher a guideline on what they should be teaching.

Read More
496 Words | 2 Pages

Under the NCLB law, states must test students in reading and math in grades 3-8 and once in high school. The states must report the results to the federal government, for the whole student population, and also for particular subgroups of students, such as students learning english, students in special education, racial minorities, and children from low-income families. Under the law, schools are kept on track toward their goals through a process known as “adequate yearly progress”, or AYP. Missing an AYP, especially for more than one year in a row, can have detrimental affects to the school’s funding and freedom to run the school. A school that misses AYP two years in a row has to allow students to transfer to a better-performing public school in the same district.

Read More

More about Arguments Against Standardized Testing

Related Topics

Open Document