Colleges and universities should not use academic success as the main factor in determining college admission because studies indicate that there is practically no difference in the scholastic performance of those who do and do not submit test scores. However, there is considerable evidence that multiple-choice tests and their scores, for some applicants, conceal more information about the applicant than they reveal. In this essay, I will discuss whether or not academic success should be the main determining factor in college admissions. I will also provide a personal opinion on the subject. Critics of standardized testing in college admissions say that standardized tests are no longer as good of an indicator of college success as once thought. The arguments against standardized testing indicate that testing is biased against certain groups, adds stress to both educators and students and impedes the assessment of very important skills. They adamantly believe that these tests have become, for some students at least, barriers to …show more content…
They also believe that this strongly biased .… at a time when diversity is critical to our society. In their opinion, wealthy students are essentially more prepared for standardized tests through better life experiences, such as first class schools and test prep tutors. These opponents also support the notion that testing adds too much stress to student and teachers alike. They suggest that students spend a lot of time stressing over the SAT/ACT when they could be focusing their energy on more important academic and social activities that could benefit them in the future. Lastly, those opposed to academic success as the main determining factor, believes that testing inhibits any sort of creative or unconventional thinking. This is important because this type of skill needed in college and in the