ipl-logo

Arguments Against Standardized Testing

475 Words2 Pages

The idea of replacing standardized testing with alternative assessments like projects and portfolios is gaining traction among education experts and policymakers. Standardized testing has long been criticized for its negative impact on student learning and the way it narrows down the curriculum. Moreover, it does not provide a comprehensive picture of student achievement and school performance. On the other hand, alternative assessments such as projects and portfolios can capture a broader range of skills and knowledge, promote deeper learning, and encourage student creativity and critical thinking. Therefore, it might be worth considering whether the state of Kentucky should get rid of standardized testing and explore other ways of measuring student achievement and school performance. Standardized tests have been a controversial topic in the education system for quite some time. While these tests are meant to provide an objective measure of a student's knowledge and growth, they often fall short of accurately capturing a student's abilities. There are several reasons for this, including the fact that standardized tests are not always equitable, as they tend to favor students who come …show more content…

Unlike standardized tests that often rely on rote memorization and recall of information, performance-based assessment allows students to showcase their understanding of subject matter through a range of activities that promote higher-order thinking skills. These assessments provide students with opportunities to work collaboratively, think critically, and apply knowledge to real-world situations, which are all essential skills for success in college, career, and life. By allowing students to choose how they demonstrate their knowledge and skills, performance-based assessment empowers them to take ownership of their learning and develop a deeper understanding of the

Open Document