ipl-logo

Arguments For Federalist No. 10

535 Words3 Pages

The main argument for federalist No.10 was that the new ideas suggested in the constitution were one of the safest ways to go about trying to build a government for our country. The idea was that we needed a republic that was going to protect the liberty and the rights of the citizens while also protecting against those who have other interests at heart which could have hurt the system that they were trying to put in place. Another reason they needed it was to stop factions, factions were groups of people sometimes in larger groups that had other interests at heart even if their interests would only benefit them. James Madison defines fractions as a “mortal disease” (Library) and talks about how the people concerned with their own agenda don't help their fellow man or society. …show more content…

The thought was that the power should be with the citizens to vote and to back that up with a strong central government that would be able to handle the tasks and problems that would come up. Madison said that a federal system was important so that when it was needed, the government would have the power that they need to ensure that the United States would continue to thrive for years to come. Also, with the federal system, everybody is united under one which promotes prosperity in the times of tragedies. When the federalists were arguing their reasons, one of their main points was “These constitutions are distinctive in being not simply compacts between rulers and rulers but involving the people, the general government, and the states constituting the federal union.”

Show More
Related

Summary Of The Federalist Paper No. 51

774 Words | 4 Pages

The Federalist Papers No. 51 were written by either James Madison or Alexander Hamilton to address the various concerns the residents of New York had with the newly formed government provided to them and the other colonies via the Constitution, more specifically the purpose of the new structure of government, the separation into different branches of the government and each branch’s reliance on the people, and the system of checks and balances and duties placed on each branch among other things. The Federalist Papers No. 51 also explained the necessity of the government outlined in the Constitution and why the founding fathers found it best to arrange the new government the way they did. One of the main ideas addressed in the Federalist

Read More

Summary Of The Federalist No. 10

827 Words | 4 Pages

It was believed that our central shouldn’t have as much power as it did. The Federalist No. 10 papers were initially written to make sure that no branch has too much power, and thus, our Constitution was created and ratified. There are three types of branches in

Read More

Summary Of The Federalist No. 10 1787

701 Words | 3 Pages

James Madison argues in his article of The Federalist No.10, Our government was created to accomplished governing the aggression and corruption cause by factions. Madison characterizes factions as groups of individuals who assemble to secure and advance their exceptional financial interests and political suppositions. Despite the fact that these groups are inconsistent with one another, they conflict with citizens in general interest, and in general other citizens interests as a community. American people are divers by nature, having distinctive thoughts and viewpoints, with the capacities, and assets. Along these lines, people have a diverse interest on a basic level, interests which they will bolster, regularly to the detriment of different

Read More

Dbq Federalist 10

1552 Words | 7 Pages

When talk of the Constitution arises it is understandable that colonists were weary of a government that would have that much power after they worked so hard to break away from Great Britain. The Federalists firmly believed that the Constitution would strengthen the Federal union and not give too much power to the central

Read More

Similarities Between The Constitution And The Federalists

663 Words | 3 Pages

Federalists were supporters of a strong central government that included certain measures to limit the power of the masses, such as the electoral college. Since their ideas so harshly contrasted with those expressed in the Articles of Confederation, they decided to draft an entirely new Constitution that would satisfy their ideas and goals for government. However, even though they wanted to limit the extent to which the government was truly democratic, they still needed the support of

Read More

Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

744 Words | 3 Pages

(This goes before the main argument) The main Argument between the Anti-Federalist and the Federalist was about the amount of control/authority that the government should have. Though the people were now the governing body there was not much protection and liberties that they were entitled to. James Madison did not want to risk the constitution not being ratified; he drafted the Bill of Rights. Even though the Anti-Federalist Failed to prevent the ratification of the U.S. Constitution led to what we know as the Bill of Rights, the ten amendments that protected the

Read More

The Federalist 10: Defending The Ratification Of The Constitution

212 Words | 1 Pages

The Federalist 10 was produced on November 22, 1787 and was written by James Madison. James Madison was the 4th President of The United States and is the author of the Federalist 10. Madison wrote the Federalist 10 to directly defend the ratification of the Constitution and in it he mainly focuses on factions and why we need them. Factions are groups of people with different opinions and even though they seem bad, Madison proved that we need them. In the Federalist 10 he states that there are two ways to remove faction one

Read More

Federalist 10 Summary

679 Words | 3 Pages

Madison begins Federalist 10 by stating that a well-functioning government should be able to prevent and control factions and their effects. A faction is any group of people who hold a shared interest and whose common interest either hinders the rights of others in society or harms society as a whole. Although factions cause confusion and violence to occur in a society, no government will be able to stop factions from developing; Madison states that this is because, in order to destroy factions, one would need to destroy liberty. Along with not being able to abolish factions, Madison asserts that it is impractical to try to control factions because individuals will always have differing opinions; he also articulates that the main purpose of governments is to protect

Read More

Federalist 10 Pros And Cons

968 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout Federalist 10, Madison warned his audience of the dangers of factions. Madison believed that as long as people espoused differing opinions, came from different backgrounds, and especially, as long as there was an unequal distribution of property, people would form factions with like-minded individuals whose ideologies they shared. This grouping of people of America, in his opinion, would lead to great violence in the country that could harm the nation’s wellbeing. In order to remedy this problem, in which he viewed unequal distribution of property as the main culprit, Madison decided that setting up a Republic which would be composed of only the most qualified candidates and would be composed of a multitude of factions would be

Read More

Studied Criticisms Of James Madison's Federalist 10

343 Words | 2 Pages

James Madison’s Federalist 10 was written amid criticisms that a republican form of government had never been successful on a large scale. Madison’s argument was that a well-constructed union could control factions. He argued that in order to control factions from their causes, we would need to either give up liberty or free thought. Since we cannot infringe upon these two natural rights, we must move on to controlling the effects. A republic, Madison argues, would be able to do this because the people choose the representatives, and they choose representatives who they feel best represent their opinions.

Read More

The Federalist No. 10 Argument

978 Words | 4 Pages

The Federalist No. 10” is a persuasive argument written by James Madison in an attempt to ratify the Constitution. He wrote a series of documents called the Federalist Papers under a pseudonym to convince others to approve of the Constitution. He says that factions are not good for America, neither is a pure democracy. Madison provides extensive arguments and remedies for the problems he is addressing. James Madison is attempting to ratify the Constitution by analyzing the way to deal with factions, comparing a republic to a democracy, and by comparing a small government to a large government.

Read More

Constitutional Convention Dbq

1145 Words | 5 Pages

These individuals believed that a federal government with the ability to raise taxes, support an army, and regulate trade between the states, as well as settle interstate disputes, would be good for the nation and assist the country in becoming a successful, competitive nation. The Federalists believed strongly that a powerful federal government was crucial to the continued existence of the country and its ability to develop into a country of merit. As mentioned in Federalist Paper XV, “It must in truth be acknowledged that… they in general appear to harmonize in this sentiment, at least, that there are material imperfections in our national system, and that something is necessary to be done to rescue us from impending anarchy” (Hamilton et. al. 1787).

Read More

Essay On The Federalists

498 Words | 2 Pages

James Madison, founding father and fourth president of United States wrote the federalists paper number 10 in favor of the constitution. He believes that constitution is the only way to keep balance and control any problem this country faces. He uses faction as an example and talks about how it can cause problems but most importantly how to deal with the problems. He defines faction as groups of people who came together to promote their own interests and opinions. He said that these groups take advantage of the public and violate their rights.

Read More

Anti Federalists Arguments

487 Words | 2 Pages

The federalists believed in having a strong national government with supreme power over state governments. They also argued that if they were to give too much power to the states, it would no doubt create a government with not enough power to act. They believed this was great movement that would protect the people's rights from the Bill of Rights, government, and the

Read More

Anti Federalist Arguments

151 Words | 1 Pages

Finally, the New Constitution needed to be ratified but had difficulties being passed. The Federalist, newspapers, were in support of ratification. These areas expressed the importance of the new Constitution. Antifederalist, on the other hand, believed that the Constitution would give too power to the central government while states would have little to none. In the end, anti-federals lost and federalist, those in favor of the new Constitution, added a bill of rights to satisfy anti-federalist.

Read More

More about Arguments For Federalist No. 10

Open Document