Arguments To Explain The Theory Of Natural Law

715 Words3 Pages

Explain the theory of Natural Law

Natural Law is a moral theory created in Ancient Greece by renowned philosopher Aristotle. He believed that human beings can determine the actions to be taken when in a moral situation. This is described as Natural Law. Aristotle defined this as a law written from within nature that enables humans to dictate the actions taken during a question of morality. He believed that if these laws were correctly followed, it would lead to eudaimonia, a sense of purpose, fulfillment. The theory was then further developed by 13th century philosopher and Catholic priest Thomas Aquinas. He adapted his ideas by suggesting the real purpose of man is to give his life to God.

Aquinas established five different ways in which a person could fulfill their purpose.These methods are known as the Primary precepts. Aquinas created them in order to give life meaning, and to identify God’s given purposes in life. They are designed to identify actions that are morally good, more catered for an absolutist frame of mind. The primary precepts are as follows: To worship God, To create and inhabit an ordered society, to reproduce, to learn, and to defend the innocent. According to Aquinas, following these precepts is essential for maintaining good and to stir away any evil. …show more content…

Reason is believed to analyse human behaviour to produce a moral standard to follow. Aristotle famously said: “Natural law is everywhere the same...just as fire burns the same both here and in Persia.” By this he means natural law creates a standard that is the same for everyone, no matter what country they are from or what type of society they live