Arizona V. Case Briefs
258 Words2 Pages
Recommended: Arizona v fulminante case brief
Arizona v. Hicks
480 U.S. 321 (1987)
Facts:
A bullet was fired through the floor of Hick’s apartment on April 18th, 1987. The bullet injured a man in the apartment below Hick’s apartment. Police officers arrived at Hick’s apartment to investigate the shooting. Upon investigating, the police officers seized 3 weapons and a stocking mask. Also, while investigating, one of the police officers noticed expensive stereo equipment. Officer Nelson suspected that this equipment was stolen so he recorded the serial numbers. To do this, Officer Nelson had to move through other items including a turntable which he also suspected to be stolen. Officer Nelson’s suspicions were correct as it was confirmed that the equipment was indeed stolen.
Related
The Case Of Brian James Ferry V. City Of Tucson
676 Words | 3 Pages
On Feb. 2, 2002 a couple from Phoenix left on a trip to Tucson and were never heard from again – but now, a little more than 16 years later, Brian James Ferry stands accused of the alleged murders of Charles Martin Russell and Catherine Nelson. According to the Nicol Green, a prosecuting lawyer, Russell and Nelson drove up to Tucson to purchase a motorcycle being sold by Ferry. He had placed a false advertisement in the Arizona Republic and was selling the nonexistent motorcycle for $12,000.
Chimel Vs. California Case Study
455 Words | 2 Pages
Title: Chimel v. California Date/Court: United States Supreme Court, 1969 Facts: This case deals with Ted Chimel, who they suspected robbed a local coin shop. On September 13, 1965, several officers from Santa Ana came to the home of Chimel with an arrest warrant for his expected involvement in the burglary. The officers arrived at the door and identified themselves to Chimel’s wife and asked if they could come into the home, she agreed and showed them into the house. While in the house the officers waited 10-15 minutes until Chimel came home from work.
Thompson Vs Arizona Case Summary
1003 Words | 5 Pages
In Arizona, relocation of a minor child when there is a written agreement or court order between two parents (both residing in the state of Arizona), is regulated by Arizona Revised Statute 25-408. In most cases, application of this statute’s regulations becomes necessary when one parent wishes to relocate with the minor child out of state. In some cases, such as Thompson v. Thompson, the statute can be cited in relation to relocation within the state of Arizona. A Brief History of the Case: Thompson v. Thompson:
Hernandez V. Arizona Board Of Regents Case Brief
1228 Words | 5 Pages
Leonel Torres (Group #1) BUS3 80 09/08/14 Case Brief Case Name: Hernandez v. Arizona Board of Regents, 172 Ariz. 244; 866 P.2d 1330; 1994Ariz. LEXIS 6 Arizona Supreme Court, 1994. Facts: A fraternity from the University of Arizona gained new members to their organization, on August 27, 1988. The fraternity was accustomed to serving alcoholic beverages to those members who help fund the drinks.
Lawrence Vs Texas 539 Case Study
340 Words | 2 Pages
Lawrence v. Texas 539 US 558 (2003) Case Facts: In September 1998, a same-sex couple in Houston, Texas were arrested in their own apartment after police found them engaging in a consensual, intimate, sexual act. The two men, John Lawrence and Tyron Garner, were convicted of violating the Texas “Homosexual Conduct” Law, which made it a Class-C misdemeanor for same-sex adults to engage in sexual intercourse and considered it illegal sodonomy. The statute was created in 1973 after the state changed its criminal code to end the banning of heterosexual anal or oral sex. The sheriff deputies arrested and charged the couple for performing “deviate sexual intercourse” as listed in the mentioned in the Texas statute.
Aguilar Vs Texas Case Analysis
731 Words | 3 Pages
Analysis of issues in the motion to suppress. Argument a) The police relied on the information provided by CRI-2 to form the ground for an affidavit seeking to obtain a search warrant. The information from CRI-2 was not credible and could not be independently be relied upon or verified.
Civil Court Case: Horton V. California
247 Words | 1 Pages
Case: Horton v. California Citation: 496 U.S. 128 (1990) Year Decided: 1990 Facts: After obtaining a warrant for stolen items from an armed robbery, a California police officer searched petitioner Horton’s home. The officer had described both the weapons used and property stolen in the affidavit for the search warrant, but the Magistrate issuing the warrant only authorized a search for the stolen property. Even though the police did not discover the stolen property, weapons matching the officer’s description were found in plain view and seized. Horton ended up being convicted of armed robbery after a motion to suppress the seized evidence was denied by the trial court.
Lopez Case: The United States V. Lopez
285 Words | 2 Pages
The United States v. Lopez case was about Alfonzo Lopez, a 12th grade student from San Antonio, who came to school carrying a hidden weapon. Under Texas law he was charged with possession of a firearm. Later on he was dismissed of this violation and was later charged with “federal criminal statute”. He was found violating “ The Gun-Free School Act”, which was created in 1990. His sentence was 6 months in prison and two years of being supervised while being released.
Supreme Court Case Of Nancy Cruzan V. Arizona
2245 Words | 9 Pages
Twenty five year old, Nancy Cruzan lived in the state of Missouri. Unfortunately, One night Nancy was involved in a very serious automobile accident on January 11, 1983 where she was coming home from working a long evening shift. Nancy Cruzan drove a very old vehicle, so it lacked seatbelts. Cruzan lost control of her vehicle, hit a pole and her car overturned and flipped numerous times. Nancy was ejected from her car driver seat and was found face first in a ditch.
Case Brief Lawrence Vs Texas
1672 Words | 7 Pages
Lawrence v. Texas: 539 U.S. 558 Facts of the case: In a private residence community, the Houston police had gotten a call about a weapons disturbance in the apartment of John Lawrence. John Lawrence was having drinks with two other people, who were Robert Eubanks and Tyron Garner, a few hours before the weapons disturbance was reported. Robert Eubanks, jealous of John Lawrence and Tyron Garner flirting with one another, decided to get a soda at a vending machine and called the police saying “a black male going crazy with a gun” was in the apartment (The New Yorker). The Houston police arrived at 11 pm to the unlocked apartment and entered to find John Lawrence and Tyron Garner having consensual intercourse.
Arizona Supreme Court Case Barry Jones
797 Words | 4 Pages
In 1955, Barry Jones was convicted of murdering Rachel Gray, his girlfriend's 4-year-old daughter, and was sentenced to death row. Over the years, new medical evidence was found and Mr. Jones attempted to use it and fight for his innocence. During Jones's trial in 1995, where he was sentenced to death row, it was found his lawyer failed to do even the most basic investigation necessary to assess the reliability of the evidence against him (Death Penalty Information Center). This brought the attention of the Arizona Attorney General who acknowledged that Mr. Jones did not receive a fair trial and was wrongfully convicted of capital murder as well as wrongfully sentenced to death in Arizona (Arizona Federal Public Defender). When the case entered
Wolf V. Colorado Case Brief
584 Words | 3 Pages
Before 1948 Julius A. Wolf had been arrested and tried for reasons not stated in the Supreme Court case, but the evidence that was used against Wolf was taken unlawfully, the police had no warrant for his arrest as well as no warrant to search his office. Wolf was able to get an appeal to be tried one more time. In 1948 the trial Wolf v Colorado Supreme Court had begun. It was a very controversial topic because the case was based on the violation of the Fourth Amendment right of protection from search and seizures.
Major Ethical Challenges Of The State Of Arizona
386 Words | 2 Pages
The major ethical challenges the state of Arizona must make regarding increasing of advertisement of the lottery are short term and long term effects. The short term decision, which would be to increase marketing of lotteries may bring much greater income to the state of Arizona. By increasing their spending and putting their focus on the lottery, much more people may fall into the trap of buying lottery tickets. The long term decision may turn out to be a negative choice for Arizona’s economy. Putting all their focus on the lottery, instead of more important tasks, such as food shelters, water supplies, and health care may put the state’s economy in an even greater crisis.
The Criminal Justice System: Miranda V. Arizona
812 Words | 4 Pages
Criminal Justice System The Criminal Justice System is a lengthy process in which those convicted of a crime go through in order to determine the type and time of their sentencing. Crime is breaking any part of the law. Crime can be of various levels of significance depending on the type of crime committed. Misdemeanors, which are minor crimes, can result in under a year in jail/prison.
Case: State Of California Vs. Scott Lee Peterson
716 Words | 3 Pages
"The State of California versus Scott Lee Peterson (Case number 1056770, 2005)", was an interesting case. This case was interesting because Laci was a very beautiful and seemingly young, friendly, and happily pregnant woman with lots of friends. Her husband, although attractive, had a kind of macho tough guy womanizer type of persona about himself. It is hard to believe or fathom someone being so cruel as to kill their pregnant wife, regardless of their marital problems. Laci came up missing on December 24, of 2002, the day before Christmas.
More about Arizona V. Case Briefs
The Case Of Brian James Ferry V. City Of Tucson
676 Words | 3 PagesChimel Vs. California Case Study
455 Words | 2 PagesThompson Vs Arizona Case Summary
1003 Words | 5 PagesHernandez V. Arizona Board Of Regents Case Brief
1228 Words | 5 PagesLawrence Vs Texas 539 Case Study
340 Words | 2 PagesAguilar Vs Texas Case Analysis
731 Words | 3 PagesCivil Court Case: Horton V. California
247 Words | 1 PagesLopez Case: The United States V. Lopez
285 Words | 2 PagesSupreme Court Case Of Nancy Cruzan V. Arizona
2245 Words | 9 PagesCase Brief Lawrence Vs Texas
1672 Words | 7 PagesArizona Supreme Court Case Barry Jones
797 Words | 4 PagesWolf V. Colorado Case Brief
584 Words | 3 PagesMajor Ethical Challenges Of The State Of Arizona
386 Words | 2 PagesThe Criminal Justice System: Miranda V. Arizona
812 Words | 4 PagesCase: State Of California Vs. Scott Lee Peterson
716 Words | 3 Pages