McKenzie Dalcour HIST 1301 Professor Gooding March 16, 2024 Midterm Essay: Differences between The Articles of Confederation and The U.S. Constitution The Articles of Confederation were adopted on November 15, 1777, and were to serve as the nation’s first “constitution”. The Articles of Confederation were ratified in 1781 and forced into effect. It was essentially a guideline or code of laws and rules between the fourteen states. However, the Articles of Confederation had many “issues”, issues are one way to put it. Many things that just would not work for the long term or not enough thought put into what you want your Nation to be run on. Due to this, the U.S. Constitution was put into place on March 9, 1789. Some of the differences between the Articles of Confederation and the U.S. …show more content…
At the time, this was believed to be a solution and cause unification. Nevertheless, this is one of the differences in the U.S. Constitution, it clearly establishes legislative, judicial, and executive branches. This created a bicameral system, making the branches work together on many things and individually. It also established state and federal branches, so now the powers have been split and limited. By establishing the legislative, judicial, and executive branches in the U.S. Constitution the bicameral system also establishes checks and balances that were not in place in the Articles of Confederation. Now, they have a bicameral system which makes the branches work together when it comes to making decisions for the entirety of the nation. It also establishes sole powers elected by each branch. Nevertheless, this system differs from the Articles of Confederation because in the Articles of Confederation the system in place was not an effective checks and balances system. This system that the U.S. Constitution establishes makes sure that no branch has more power than the