ipl-logo

Assess The Difference Between Kantianism And Utilitarianism

966 Words4 Pages

Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher, is one of the most influential philosophers in the history of Western Philosophy. Based on the principles of Kantianism, certain types of actions are allowed, even in cases where the action would bring more happiness than the alternative. On the other hand, philosopher Jeremy Bentham, the founder of Utilitarianism, argues on the moral rightness of a decision based on its outcome. Clearly, both moral theories have had an immense impact that have carried on in today’s society as well. According to Kant, it is always wrong to lie, no matter what, even lying to a murderer asking at the door where his victim is. In this case, if one does lie and despite one’s good intentions the lie leads to the murderer’s …show more content…

According to utilitarianism, an action is right as long as it promotes happiness and pleasure, and wrong if it produces unhappiness and pain. Using the example of the Nazi coming to the door asking if there are Jews hiding in your home, a utilitarian would answer the opposite than an individual who supports Kantianism would. Therefore, a utilitarian would lie and say that there’s no Jew hiding in his/her home, because they would want to prevent pain and unhappiness from happening. Even though you are lying, you are saving someone’s life, and in utilitarianism this is the right thing to do. Clearly, there’s a lot of self-sacrifice involved in this theory. You have to act in a way that you are benefiting others without personally gaining anything from that action. Utilitarianism is also about calculating utils and disutils. When performing an action, you have to think of the people who are involved, and the possible outcome of the action in order to maximize utility. For each outcome, and person there will be utils and disutils created, then you calculate all of them and whichever outcome creates the most utils, that certain action has to be taken. In conclusion, utilitarianism is all about creating a positive outcome to any action taken, unlike Kantianism that doesn’t promote lying, even under certain

Show More
Related
288 Words | 2 Pages

I chose to show the book, “Dark Places” in a simple shadow box. The book is a non fiction about a tragic life story of a girl named Libby Day. When she was only seven years old when her mother and two sisters were murdered by her brother. But… is he really the killer? That's the question Libby Day hunts to find.

Read More
1673 Words | 7 Pages

Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that determines right from wrong when looking at the outcomes. It believes that the most ethical choice is the one that will produce the greatest good for the greatest number. Consequentialism is found in utilitarianism; consequentialism is largely thought about during war. When you fight for your life in war, you end up taking another person's life. While this may be good for your country, it is hurting a different country.

Read More
654 Words | 3 Pages

In the case of Kantian ethics, imagine a murderer comes to the door asking for your friend, who is in the other room. Our moral intuition would likely tell us not to tell the murderer where our friend was. On the other hand, Kant believed we had a moral imperative to not lie to the murderer. In the case of Utilitarianism, Peter Singer has a famous example involving a drowning kid and malnourished kids in a third world country. Imagine that you are on a way to a job interview and you pass a lake where a kid is drowning.

Read More
268 Words | 2 Pages

I don’t think that it’s wrong to lie to a murderer who is trying kill someone because I’m trying to help someone who is about to die, It will make me feel like i save someone and for me, saving someone life is very important to me for some reason. lying to a murderer to save someone's life make it save two people at once because if i don't tell a murderer that the person who he want to kill where is he or she, then he won't have to kill that person and he won't have to become a serial murder and he won't have to go back to jail so lying can lead things in the right way depending on what situation we are in . i dont think that Kant’s morality is not too rigid and inflexible. Even though lying is considered a bad thing to do but it is an acceptable

Read More
1121 Words | 5 Pages

Kantianism and utilitarianism are both moral theories that appeal to different groups of people. Different people have different views on what makes an action moral or not based on their ideas and values. Kantianism is a moral theory created by Immanuel Kant based on ideas, such as the good-will and a priori knowledge. Utilitarianism is a moral theory created by John Mill and Jeremy Bentham that is based around maximizing happiness. Both of these moral theories are followed by many and help people determine what is moral and what is not.

Read More
271 Words | 2 Pages

The major difference between the Utilitarianism and Kantianism theories depends on the idea of what is considered morally right and morally wrong. The Utilitarianism theory focusses on the consequences that are determined by morally actions made by individuals. The utilitarian theory believes that business ethics is based on the well-being of many humans, in an effort to bring forth wealth and eliminate potential harm. Meanwhile the Kantian theory believes that moral respect for human beings is more important. The Kantian theory expects for individuals to make the right decisions for the right reasons, not because it will provoke wealth.

Read More
428 Words | 2 Pages

The Utilitarianism and Kantian ethics are opposite of each other in many cases about morality. On the one hand, Utilitarianism claims that what makes people happiest and greatest number of people happy is morally right to do. On the other hand, Kantian ethics, first introduced by philosopher Kant, claims that we have some certain rules, like never lie even if it will benefit many people, and we should follow these rules no matter what the outcome is. Many philosophers have agreed on the case for Utilitarianism because it claims that we should calculate the outcome of our actions before doing them.

Read More
175 Words | 1 Pages

The most central aspect of Kant’s philosophy is that people are not a means to an end but an end in all of themselves. In simple words, Kant tells us to not use people. Kant believed that the maxims the rules of moral conduct should be universal. By universal Kant means that the maximum should apply at all times as we get further into Kent philosophy we will see they can't ideas are very strict and unwavering is therefore unsurprising that can reject utilitarianism can put great emphasis on the rights of individuals and stresses personal autonomy which is inconsistent with the application if you need to utilitarianism. Furthermore, the idea of the unwavering nature of Kantian Ethics is the idea that the right takes priority over the good.

Read More
1222 Words | 5 Pages

Ethics and the search for a good moral foundation first drew me into the world of philosophy. It is agreed that the two most important Ethical views are from the world’s two most renowned ethical philosophers Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill. In this paper, I will explore be analyzing Mill’s Greatest Happiness Principle and Kant’s Categorical Imperative. In particular, I want to discuss which principle provides a better guideline for making moral decisions. And which for practical purposes ought to be taught to individuals.

Read More
431 Words | 2 Pages

It is a results-based concept that gives no weight to the intentions that drive actions but, rather, places emphasis on the consequences of such actions. With specific reference to Bentham’s Utilitarianism and his incorporation of Hedonistic Calculus, this theory is simply derived from human being’s primal desires to seek pleasure and restrict pain, and suggests that morally good actions are those which would accomplish such. Furthermore, the idea of striving to achieve ‘the greatest amount of good for the greatest number’ fuels an objection to this theory when considering the minority,

Read More
866 Words | 4 Pages

Utilitarianism is different from Kantianism because it says that you can perform any action even if it provides some harm to others, but at the end it should provide maximum utility. But on the other end, Kantianism says that you need to treat everyone equal, no one less than the other. They both hold different views but they both are right in certain situations. Utilitarianism and Kantianism conflict in many situations. For example, you have a friend who’s pregnant, but she’s scared to tell her parents.

Read More
1564 Words | 7 Pages

Utilitarian suggest that we make our moral decisions from the position of a benevolent, disinterested spectator. Rather than thinking about

Read More
1228 Words | 5 Pages

As it has been shown, the utilitarian view has its strengths and is certainly logical in some cases, however, Kantian ethics offer a more stable set of moral

Read More
494 Words | 2 Pages

Utilitarianism is a moral philosophy that is credited to being created by Jeremey Bentham. Bentham believed that all humans make choices based on two feelings, pain and pleasure. Because of this, Bentham believed that motives are not good or bad in nature but instead on what feeling a human might feel more.

Read More
1685 Words | 7 Pages

Utilitarianism is a teleological ethical theory based on the idea that an action is moral if it causes the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. The theory is concerned with predicted consequences or outcomes of a situation rather than focusing on what is done to get to the outcome. There are many forms of utilitarianism, having been introduced by Jeremy Bentham (act utilitarianism), and later being updated by scholars such as J.S. Mill (rule utilitarianism) and Peter Singer (preference utilitarianism). When referring to issues of business ethics, utilitarianism can allow companies to decide what to do in a given situation based on a simple calculation. Many people would agree that this idea of promoting goodness

Read More

More about Assess The Difference Between Kantianism And Utilitarianism

Related Topics

Open Document