Athens Vs. Spart Limited Democracy In Ancient Greece

612 Words3 Pages

The cities of Athens and Sparta were bitter rivals in ancient Greece. Geographically they are very close to each other but have sometimes had very different values, lifestyles, and cultures. The Athenian type of choosing a legislature was called Limited Democracy while the Spartan shape was called "oligarchy", however, it had components of government (administer by lords), majority rule government (through the race of gathering/congresspersons), and privileged (lead by the high society or land owning class). Sparta has had two rulers as of late, who ruled until they died. Then again, the leader of Athens is chosen every year. Athens is said to have been the origin of democracy. Sparta was an "Oligarchy". The Ancient Greek "oligos" means "few", while "archia" means "govern" – 'govern by the few'. Five Ephors were chosen every …show more content…

The Spartan equivalent of the Senate was its “gerousia”, while Ephors and the Kings would regularly attend the “apella” (general assembly) to develop and try to pass “rhetrai”, or motions and decrees. Different motivations behind the assembly were to vote on and settle on common choices. The vote was made by a straightforward yelling of 'yes' or 'no'. In general, the five Ephors had the ability to overrule the Kings, yet tended to keep to religious and military obligations. Sparta's arrangement of government was exceptionally restrictive and open to individuals from just the most astounding social standing. To control the king and the Ephors Sparta had a 28 seats board. these men were enrolled from the most amazing social class, the recognized Spartiates. On the other hand perhaps like medieval

More about Athens Vs. Spart Limited Democracy In Ancient Greece