ipl-logo

Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

748 Words3 Pages

Atomic Bomb The United States of America used two atomic bombs in order to end the war with Japan during World War 2. I believe the use of the bomb was not justifiable by the USA because of the innocent lives killed. For example, the first atomic bomb dropped on Japan was codenamed “Little Boy”.Historians estimate that between 70,000 to 80,000 people were killed instantly by the bomb. The rate of number shown of total deaths show that many people were unnecessarily killed. Some common arguments in favor can be that it led to a quick end to WW2 and it saved the lives of American soldiers.Which in fact it did but cannot not repay the total amount of deaths caused by the atomic bomb. I am against the atomic bomb being used on Japan because of the destruction it caused and the bomb being inhumane. Furthermore, the bomb was inhumane because it caused innocent people to lose their lives .The bombs were inhumane due to the injuries it caused.It was a way of being cruel and heartless by using the atomic bomb. In addition, the bomb caused widespread deaths and damage. Robert Oppenheimer who was the American physicist who is referred to as the “father of the atomic bomb” stated that “the active material of the bomb itself is toxic.” Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not military targets and as …show more content…

Foremost, “some have suggested that the US could have carried out a naval blockade and forced Japan control into surrendering.”This could mean that the United States could have undertaken the enemy to give up their sources from entering the country.Which is where Japan would struggle and not have any sources to survive which would make Japan surrender.To begin with some historians have agreed that the United States could have used the atomic bomb in a different way that didn’t harm innocent civilians. They could have dropped the atomic bomb in an unpopulated place.Where not a lot of civilians

Show More
Related
816 Words | 4 Pages

The United States entered WW2 after the surprise Japanese attack on Pearl harbor in 1941. To inspire the Japanese surrender in 1945 , and ultimately end the war, the US dropped the world's first two atomic bombs on the civilian population of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Since the surrender, there has been debate over whether the decision to use atomic weapons was justified and whether it was the only way to end the war. The use of this atomic weapon was not justified and it was not the only way to inspire surrender and allow the U.S to win the war.

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

Afterwards, the United States declared war on Japan, and joined allies against the axis powers. The United States’ use of the atomic bombs is justified because it saved American lives; Japan was given fair warning, and their aggressions towards the U.S. The atomic bombs on Japan saved many American lives. Document 15 reads: The entire population of Japan is

Read More
602 Words | 3 Pages

Although it was inhumane and horrific, we were justified in dropping the atomic bombs because American soldiers were being tortured, American bodies were disrespected after death, and the bombs ended the war preventing more American casualties. The first reason that America was justified in dropping the atomic bombs is that American soldiers that were captured in Japan were being tortured. When Japanese soldiers captured American soldiers, they needed some way of trying to get them to give up valuable information because the U.S soldiers wouldn’t just tell them for no reason. So they began torturing them in hopes they’d crack. Document 2 showed the numerous

Read More
556 Words | 3 Pages

The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was the first and only time an atomic bomb was used. The bomb killed thousands of innocent Japanese civilians, and left few survivors. The Allies thought of using the bomb because it would instantly end the war, and it did, but at the cost of many innocent lives. The bomb was also used as a factor to demonstrate the power of the US, and was supposed to help push other countries out of several countries. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was unnecessary because it gave little benefit to the Allies and led to thousands of innocent lives lost.

Read More
676 Words | 3 Pages

Japan was weakening, “The food situation gradually becoming worse and worse…” Stated in source H. America had many industrial resources to use against Japan and so Japan had essentially been defeated. Japan pushed only for the sake of their countries honour as the shame of unconditional surrender goes against their code of honour. Furthermore a warning was given to Japan with America promising to drop the atomic bomb, however there was no evidence and so it could have easily been deemed a bluff. An American nuclear scientist stated, “A demonstration of the bomb best be made… Japan could then be asked to surrender.” This source seems somewhat reliable as it is from one of the American scientists and they would know the strength of the bomb.

Read More
567 Words | 3 Pages

It was a military necessity to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. For starters, it was a war necessity to drop the atomic bomb was because it ended the war faster. It got them to surrender instead of continuing to fight. The atomic bomb was called, “ The Winning Weapon” because it forces the other country to surrender (OI). “We have used it to shorten the agony of the war, in order to save the lives of thousands and thousands of young Americans” (Doc I).

Read More
534 Words | 3 Pages

This caused Japan to surrender, and World War 2 ended. The atomic bomb was justified because the U.S. needed Japan to surrender to end the war. The atomic bomb was justified because it was one of the possible ways to end the war with Japan. Document 1, says “They concluded that no technical demonstration they might propose, such as over a deserted island, would be likely to bring the war to an end”. This indicates that there was no other way of using the same strategies, such as island hopping, which was to capture the surrounding islands to invade Japan.

Read More
806 Words | 4 Pages

The atomic bomb was absolutely necessary. It was the end of WW2, Americans deserved revenge, and thousands of lives were saved. The atomic bomb was a brutal weapon that could wipe out entire populations and ignite devastation. The Japanese did not need a revolutionary weapon to cause destruction

Read More
810 Words | 4 Pages

The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a very controversial event in history that led to the inevitable end of WWII. Some think that the bomb was necessary to end the war and without it, the war couldn’t end. But others think the bomb was overkill because the Japanese were already on the brink of surrender. Dropping the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki had positive and negative effects.

Read More
852 Words | 4 Pages

Japan had to accept unconditional surrender; if they disagreed with that request, America would drop the bomb. What made the Japanese surrender was the retention of their emperor; anything else couldn’t have forced a Japanese surrender, including the attack of the atomic bomb. As Japan's Prime Minister Suzuki spelled out on June 9, 1945. “Should the Emperor system be abolished, they [the Japanese people] would lose all reason for existence…. [and have] no choice but to go on fighting to the last man” (Butow).

Read More
561 Words | 3 Pages

Morality of the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima The atomic bomb was the cause for the end of World War II. In the year 1939, scientist Albert Einstein started working on the Uranium bomb and not even 10 years later, this deadly weapon was dropped on Hiroshima in Japan killing 80,000 people, but also ending the war. Immediately after the bomb dropped, people took sides on the morality of this event. While some people think Americans were wrong in dropping ‘Little Boy’, others think this was good because it saved many US soldiers, showed our perseverance in winning the war, and was the best solution to get the Japanese to surrender considering how terrible the conditions were.

Read More
608 Words | 3 Pages

What if the united states never dropped the atomic bomb. In august 1945 president truman decided to drop two atomic bombs on japan. "We would have kept on fighting until all Japanese were killed, but we would not have been defeated," by which he meant that they would not have been disgraced by surrender. after the event, to look back and say that Japan was already a beaten nation, and to ask what therefore was the justification for the use of the atomic bomb to kill so many thousands of helpless Japanese in this inhuman way; furthermore, should we not better have kept it to ourselves as a secret weapon for future use, if necessary.

Read More
797 Words | 4 Pages

The atomic bomb was a terrible thing. It killed 150,000 in Hiroshima and 75,000 in Nagasaki, plus many survivors became horribly disfigured from the intensive heat, and death from radiation is uncertain it may not kill the victims for days, weeks, months, or even years. (Although the bomb did save the USA from sending foot soldier to Japan, the Japanese were ready to surrender on terms that they can keep their empire and we had no need to use it). Japan was the first to feel the destructive power of the atomic bomb. Killing a quarter of a million people and costing two billion dollars of war replenish.

Read More
869 Words | 4 Pages

My argument is that I am for the decision of the atomic bomb drop on Japan. The atomic bomb save millions of American lives that stop them from doing D-Day-style on Japanese homeland and islands. These island invasion cost a lot of American casualties, and the Japanese soldiers are willing and very determine fight to the death. They see suicide as an honorable alternative to surrender. The whole population of Japan are willing to die to fight the Americans, if the U.S. didn’t dropped the bomb on Japan, then the war will dragged on and the Americans will lose a lot of casualties and Japan will lose almost all the population.

Read More
775 Words | 4 Pages

Many people are for it, while many people are against it. Personally, I can see the reasoning from both sides. Some people say that it was unacceptable that we used the atomic bomb, because although the Japanese attacked us first, they feel it was unjust to the Japanese to hit them back in such an intense way. People who see it negatively mostly say their reasoning is that the two atomic bombs hit and killed many innocent women, children, and families. Although this may be true many feel as though they are ignoring the fact of the offensive attack the the Japanese took upon

Read More

More about Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

Open Document