ipl-logo

Augustine, Epictetus, And Plato's Definition Of A Good Life

1594 Words7 Pages

Which is better – a happy or a meaningful life? If we all dove deep into ourselves and explored the depths, we would see our desires are not so different. Today we all share one common goal: happiness. But what exactly is happiness? Many people deem living a ‘successful’ and comfortable life as the definition of happiness. However, philosophers of the past strived not for happiness, but rather, simply a ‘good life’. While Augustine, Epicurus, Epictetus, and Plato all have different definitions of a good life and different portrayals of how to live in order to have a good life, Plato’s view is ultimately the best because his concept of a harmonized soul allows people to overcome any difficulty. One method of determining whether a philosopher’s …show more content…

Specifically, he proposes that a good life entails the tranquility of the mind grounded in apathy. This will, therefore, lead to the peace of the mind and so, we will never be disturbed/disappointed. He says, “nothing is in our control (external) except how we think about certain things (internal).” For example, he supports the idea that I should not care for God because if God ends up not caring for me, I will ultimately end up not living a peaceful life. However, this apathetic approach in response to events and to life will ultimately not be beneficial for oneself. For example, if my child dies, Epictetus says that the correct approach to this incident will be to simply think of it as one of the countless deaths that happens every day. The idea is that my child is just one among many human beings. This approach will undoubtedly dehumanize me because it if the death of my own child is to be disregarded for the sake of my ‘peace’, it would devalue the relationships I have with my child. In addition, it doesn’t take in account that human nature can’t be changed in such a way that we are unaffected by the death of a family member. A life without meaningful and personal relationships with other people is one that is not worth living, no matter how ‘peaceful’ it is because one will never experience love, or hate, or any other feelings opposed to solely apathy. It is necessary for one to live in …show more content…

Plato’s way of living will lead to living a good life by being just, not just appearing just. How does one become just? One does so by minding his own business in society. Specifically, each class in a society is separate (and plays its own role and not of another role). In order to understand how being just will lead to a good life, we must understand how Plato’s city is constructed. His city is made up of 3 distinct classes – the Guardians (rule over the other classes selflessly), the Auxiliaries (warriors who defend the city), and the Merchants/Craftsmen. This well-ordered society will be reflected in every person’s soul. Specifically, each class reflects a different part of a person’s soul. The Guardians represent the calculating/reasoning part of the soul, the Auxiliaries represent the spirited part of the soul, and the merchants/craftsmen represent the desiring part of the

Show More
Related
2106 Words | 9 Pages

When all the functions of society are performed by the rightful class, the resulting outcome will be justice. Each class has a duty to perform the responsibilities they are naturally best fit for and should refrain from executing another’s job. The state will be unjust if meddling occurs as it directly goes against the true definition of justice according to Plato. When the auxiliaries try to perform the role of the rulers or the workers attempt to be a guardian, the state is damaged and the exchanging of roles in the society will lead to the ultimate destruction of the state. The fourth virtue of a just city is justice because when each component of the state performs its main purpose, justice can be

Read More
1026 Words | 5 Pages

Book three addresses the type of education that should be taught in this ideal city, and the discussion moves from what it means to be just, to what it means to be courageous and moderate. Socrates ideas on the type of education that should be taught were unconventional for this time in Greek history. For instance, Socrates argued that certain pieces of literature ought to be censored if they promote weakness or disobedience. Correspondingly Socrates places a large emphasis on the role education plays in terms of contributing to the vitality of the city. Socrates contends that in order to have a just city, the city must develop just citizens, and the only way that is possible is through proper education of both the mind and the body.

Read More
162 Words | 1 Pages

Pirates are significant to world history because they helped fuel the colonial economy. Around the fifteen hundreds, there was an increase of trade between Europe and Asia. It became a greater opportunity for merchants. But because England, France, and Holland were latecomers, their government often hire pirateering on robbing gold and silver from Spanish and Portuguese ships and settlements instead. They, later on, became a patriotic hero.

Read More
987 Words | 4 Pages

Plato had three main ideas for life that are all wrong: intentional education, pain, and self-evaluation. Plato’s first idea to living the perfect life is to

Read More
1355 Words | 6 Pages

Was Plato trying to show what an ‘unjust’ city would look like? Why would he do that? The analysis and discussion of Plato’s ‘just’ city opens new doors about Plato, himself, and his intentions. From this analysis on the city’s short comings, one can spring more and more ideas about his ‘republic’ and his ‘ideals’ forever. This one analysis is only a small interpretation, or perspective of a small portion, or passage of The

Read More
1642 Words | 7 Pages

The main topic of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics is eudaimonia, i.e. happiness in the “living well” or “flourishing” sense (terms I will be using interchangeably). In this paper, I will present Aristotle’s view on the role of external goods and fortune for the achievement of happiness. I will argue that he considers them a prerequisite for virtue. Their contribution to happiness is indirect, via the way they affect how we can engage in rational activity according to the relevant virtues. I will then object that this view threatens to make his overall account of happiness incoherent.

Read More
1077 Words | 5 Pages

The Republic of Plato examines an imaginary tale, which uses real characters to shed light upon Socrates’ argument through the expression of intricate conversations concerning philosophy, politics, and justice. When discussing philosophy and politics Socrates mentions politeia, or the order of social and political justice. The two coexist on a fine line and are furthermore discussed when the notion of justice is brought up. Eventually it is determined that a completely just city is almost impossible to establish, yet justice as it appears in current society involves politeia. The story is narrated through Socrates’ perspective by his student, Plato, giving the appearance of a more direct and trustworthy perspective regarding the aforementioned

Read More
827 Words | 4 Pages

According to Aristotle, an individual can achieve happiness only by realizing all the works and activities in accordance with reason throughout his lifetime. He claimed that happiness consists in cultivating and exercising virtue and it is the ultimate purpose of human existence, as stated in his work Nicomachean Ethics “He is happy who lives in accordance with complete virtue and is sufficiently equipped with external goods, not for some chance period but throughout a complete life”. However, such Aristotelian concept of happiness inevitably contradicts the understanding of history as development which maintains that fulfilling the work of human exceeds the limits of an individual and thus can only be achieved in the course of history. Three

Read More
1594 Words | 7 Pages

Despite that, this does not work to explain why Plato feels so strongly about equality in the just city. In working through this argument, there are many difficulties in connecting it to the question of justice. It is hard to say, initially,

Read More
1751 Words | 8 Pages

Plato regarded justice as the true principle of social life. Plato in his day found a lot of evil in society. He saw unrighteousness rampant and injustice enthroned.

Read More
1087 Words | 5 Pages

In Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, the concept of happiness is introduced as the ultimate good one can achieve in life as well as the ultimate goal of human existence. As Aristotle goes on to further define happiness, one can see that his concept is much different from the 21st-century view. Aristotelian happiness can be achieved through choosing to live the contemplative life, which would naturally encompass moralistic virtue. This differs significantly from the modern view of happiness, which is heavily reliant on material goods. To a person in the 21st-century, happiness is simply an emotional byproduct one experiences as a result of acquiring material goods.

Read More
832 Words | 4 Pages

Plato's Republic is centered on one simple question: is it always better to be just than unjust? This is something that Socrates addresses both in terms of political communities and the individual person. Plato argues that being just is advantageous to the individual independent of any societal benefits that the individual may incur in virtue of being just. I feel as if Plato’s argument is problematic. There are not enough compelling reasons to make this argument.

Read More
1002 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout the history, there have been heated discussions on what constitutes a good life. Philosophers have given different annotations on the meaning of good life based on their beliefs, perspectives or even scientific-based evidences. Some view a good life as an accumulation of material goods that brings “large amount” of pleasure to oneself. On the other hand, Mencius and Aristotle advocate good life as possessing of pleasure that incorporates ethical values and they believe that by doing so one will experience enduring happiness. There is no ultimate right or wrong for these interpretations since this is not a factual question.

Read More
908 Words | 4 Pages

At the end of everyone’s lives, the goal appears to be about attaining happiness. Describing how to obtain happiness has been an issue that was debated in the past but is still talked about now . In Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle expands on his view of happiness and he focuses particularly on how reason helps recognize and pursue what will lead to happiness and the good life. I feel that Aristotle’s philosophies on happiness are important works within the field of philosophy and he considered one of the………of it . In this paper, I will explore Aristotle’s beliefs regarding happiness then compare and contrast them to those of Martin Seligman.

Read More
1274 Words | 6 Pages

What Makes a Good Citizen The ideas of justice and government are very prominent throughout Plato’s The Republic. The city that is devised by Socrates and his audience includes all of what makes up and supports justice. This is particularly expressed through the classes that make up the city as all of the workers are governed by a ruling class, as well as the three parts of the soul, the appetite, the rational part, and the spirit.

Read More

More about Augustine, Epictetus, And Plato's Definition Of A Good Life

Related Topics

Open Document