Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gun control in australia essay
Gun control in australia essay
Essays on gun control in australia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gun control in australia essay
Gun control in australia essay
Essays on gun control in australia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
With all the recent gun related crimes and tragedies’ that has happened recently, there are strong calls for government to act for stricter gun control laws. Mr. Alan Berlow wrote an Op-ed essay that was published in the New York Times titled “Gun Control That Actually Works”. Berlow makes the argument that there are control measures in place that works for gun control. In 1934 a measure was enacted into law to control the procurement of weapons which is known as the NFA (National Firearms Act). The NFA outlines the standard for procurement of military grade firearms and any weapon, attachment, or modification that will allow a single person to inflict a large amount of fatalities with in a single attack.
On the 28th of April 1996 in Tasmania, Australia Martin Bryant began a killing spree, murdering 35 people and injuring 23 in the town of Port Arthur. This intellectually disabled man was able to purchase multiple firearms from a local dealership without having to produce a firearms or drivers license which raised a massive question of gun control within Australia. Martin Bryant was born on the 7th of May 1967, soon after starting school at the Friend’s School and then New Town Primary it was apparent he had learning difficulties and behavioral problems. Martins records also explicitly mention a history of violent out bursts, destructive behavior, was persistently disruptive in class, struggled scholastically and took to tormenting vulnerable children causing multiple suspensions and an assessment at the Hobart Diagnostic Centre. In February of 1984 Mr. Bryant was then assessed by Dr. Cunningham-Dad, a very experienced clinical psychiatrist, who stated that Martin was intellectually disabled and had developed a personality disorder making him eligible for a disability pension.
Evaluate the effectiveness of the various elements of the Australian Legal System in achieving justice for victims, offenders and society. In your response you will need to assess the effectiveness of the different elements of the Australian criminal justice system. Justice is defined as exerting fairness and impartiality during a trial. In the Australian Legal System, young offenders are shown substantial levels of justice. They are identified as not entirely understanding the ramifications of their actions, and are therefore subject to lower levels of criminal responsibility.
Australia’s gun-related deaths dropped by 47% between 1991 and 2001. They issued another gun amnesty in 2017, ordering all unregistered or unwanted guns to be turned in over a period of 3 months. The rate at which weapons were stolen had dropped immensely and the suicide rate involving firearms fell (McMaken). Australia now experiences very few mass killings involving guns. They still have had multiple mass killings, the perpetrator usually using a blunt object, vehicle, or knife.
To answer that gun control question you will also find some very fundamental points into the pros and cons of gun control laws. Australians would love Americans to have fewer guns and stricter gun control laws. Americans fight for their right to own a gun and claim the Australian government has removed Australian's right to defend themselves. How did these similar countries come to have such vastly different views towards gun ownership? Answer this question and you resolve many of the issues that surround the gun control debate.
This would solve the problem of people just owning firearms for no good reason, but even if the this amendment had more firearm regulation on it. This would not solve all of the problems that firearms would bring for people that could get them. Malcolm (2012), provides an example of Great Britain and Australia. These two large countries had suffered from mass shootings in 1980s and 1990s, so they both decided to set up heavy gun laws to solve the problem. Great Britain had created an Act in 1998, that said owners of handguns had to turn them .
Following the 1996 Tasmania shooting in Australia, a strict gun policy was enacted banning long guns, and the Australian government started buying back guns. The effectiveness of this is analyzed by Philip Alpers, a professor at the Sydney School of Public Health. In order to possess a gun in Australia after the reform, one had to present a genuine cause, and in order to sell or transfer firearms, dealers must be licensed. In Addition to this, the government banned and bought back rapid-fire rifles and shotguns. From 1996 to 2006, 1.8 million of the 3.2 million guns in Australia were destroyed.
26 January 1788. Centuries ago, weapons such as guns were not used to harm another, they have different purposes. Hunting, protection of persons and crops are just some of the few. From 1984 to 1996, multiple killings stirred public concern. Within the past two decades of the twentieth century, following several shootings Australia wide, the Federal Government took a stand and set restrictive firearm legislation amongst all state governments.
a Bloom A prodigious amount of attention has been drawn to gun crime after many mass shootings in 2015. A mass shooting is defined by the FBI as four or more people shot and/or killed in a single event at the same general time and location (Gun Violence Archive). According to the Mass Shooting Tracker, 371 mass shootings took place in 2015 alone-- leaving 1,387 people wounded and 469 dead. Gun control has become an enduring dispute with many proponents for both sides. Congress needs to find a way to assure that the right to bear arms is protected, but also legally keep guns out of the hands of certain people.
With irresponsible gun owners and weak gun restrictions, the likelihood of an undiagnosed psychopath to purchase an automatic rifle and unload it on a public audience skyrockets. My proof of gun control’s effectiveness lies in the Pacific Ocean: Australia. Ever since their first major shooting, they refused to sell any more guns and offered a buyback to each citizen; ever since this law was put into place in 1996 after the Port Arthur incident, their collective death toll from massacres never reached anywhere close to our annual amount. Those who believe a black market will still dominate need to consider the real issue at stake here: the government is legally distributing them with a rather simple set of tasks to
On the issue of gun control, I had always thought along the lines of opposing or supporting the issue but had never thought that there could be another argument different from these two main ones that could be discussed. It was therefore quite refreshing to look at the issue from Novak’s point of view. The fact that he provided evidence to support his claim that law enforcement has worked before in reducing gun violence cases made his article all the more interesting and believable. He shows that the debate on gun control may just have been pointless all this time as the issue that should be discussed is really not whether people should have guns or not but rather how to enforce the law to ensure that perpetrators of gun violence are
One interesting fact, currently, the number of registered gun stores outnumber Starbucks and McDonald's locations in many US cities, making firearms a deep-rooted part of American life. Australians readily gave up a large number of their guns after the 1996
The use of and the owning of guns is a very hot and debated topic in society today. For many, this is a life and death debate due to the recent and numerous school shootings. These school shootings have caused an outcry for more gun control, specifically in relation to the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting. Despite these calls, increased gun control is not the answer. Most gun owners’ use their guns responsibly and for good purposes.
This paper also provides an interesting solution to gun violence; instead of already proven ineffective gun control laws, these authors suggest looking at why these laws are ineffective. Planty, Michael, and Jennifer
Everyday in the United States, ninety families are changed forever; guns claim an average of ninety lives every day in the United States, 33,000 lives in a single year. Gun control has been a debate in the United States for many years and is constantly thrusted back into the public’s attention by horrific shootings. These shootings constantly cause individuals to petition the government to place stricter and stricter regulations of guns. However, these policies cannot be the solution to this problem. To determine a solution that will be both effective and constitutional, we must look at statistics and research that has been conducted to determine the best course of action.