The Battle of Passchendaele Many battles fought during the First World War, from the year 1914 to 1918, ended in high casualties. One battle that stood out as one of the most costly and brutal battles to participate in was the Battle of Passchendaele. The element of mud filled craters contributed to the many casualties and upsets during the battle making the Battle of Passchendaele the worst battle for soldiers to participate in. In mid-October Candian soldiers arrived at the town of Passchendaele only to be shocked by the mass amounts of mud filled craters scattered around the landscape. The muddy landscape and rain filled craters increased the soldiers likelihood of getting injured or even killed. When Sir Arthur Currie, an allied general at the time, …show more content…
Craters that were filled with rain and mud slowed the allied troops down leading to the Germans killing more allied soldiers, making the battle much more difficult and brutal. This resulted in the Battle of Passchendaele being one of the worst battles to participate in because the soldiers’ odds of injury or death were much higher than other battles fought during World War I. Although The Battle of Passchendaele was one of the most costly battles fought during the First World War it was not as significant as other battles fought during World War I. In mid-November the allies captured the ridge and gained only seven or eight kilometers of the town, the Germans would later recapture the town of Passchendaele. This reveals that the Battle of Passchendaele was the least significant battle to participate in because it wasn 't recognized the same way as other battles during First World War. In conclusion, the Battle of Passchendaele was the most costly and brutal battle to participate in. Muddy landscapes and water filled craters lead to a high number of casualties for both the British and German armies. The battle also did not contribute as much to the the First World War then other Battles