1. Case Study 1 a. The ethical dilemma for Kayla is deciding between following her duties as an officer and duties as a victim’s assistant; to go against her partner or to go against what she thinks is the right thing to do in that situation. b. Relevant facts include i. Kayla, as a victim’s assistant, has a duty to provide resources and information to clients; however, Kate is not her client. ii. Even if she was her client, Kayla cannot make her press charges. iii. Kayla has only recently become an assistant. iv. Kayla is still an officer, and officers tend to have an us-vs-them mentality. Going against Frieda could cause her to be ostracized. v. Kayla seems to disagree with Frieda’s obvious homophobia. c. Values i. Individual 1. Being …show more content…
Wanting to be in good standing with the other officers 2. Being a good victim advocate d. Available courses of action i. Kayla could just put her feelings aside and let the situation go. 1. This would be letting someone get away with domestic violence ii. She could go against Frieda and arrest Liz anyway. 1. Could turn her coworkers against her and upset the victim. iii. Find a way to provide Kate with information for resources that could help her out of her situation. e. After applying the Deontological Theory, I think that once Kayla weighs the aspects of respect for all persons and putting duty above feelings, the most ethical choice would be to provide Kate information. She would avoid angering her fellow officers, the victim, or putting the victim in danger by arresting Liz, which could lead to retaliation against Kate. 2. Case Study 2 a. The ethical dilemma for Jane deciding between upholding her confidential relationship with her client and to take no action, or to report Linda and her son’s use of peyote to the proper authorities. b. Relevant facts include i. Peyote is legal during Native American religious ceremonies. 1. This use could be occurring outside of said ceremonies. ii. Her son is only 10 and using a psychoactive