Describe the costs of non-conformity to individuals, groups & wider society Non-conformity is defined as the rejection of established customs, attitudes or ideas. Non-conformity costs the individual personal and social costs. These are lawlessness, ostracisation, isolation, incarceration and depression. For example, an individual may choose to disregard norms and streak through a televised cricket match. This person would face criminal charges as a result and suffer personally and socially. The costs of non-conformity to the wider society however are increased crime rates, clogged legal systems, anti-establishment groups, questioning of authority, rebellion and revolution or unrest and social turmoil. For example, in recent years in Egypt, there has been massive non-conformity because of the 2011 Revolution. This has resulted in a widespread questioning of authority and uncertainty in their …show more content…
These benefits are individuality, expression and personality formation. When an individual deviates from certain norms in a small way, they express their individuality and shows personal growth. Non-conformity has benefits for wider society as well. These are that groups who choose not to conform can force society to consider inequality and social issues. An example is Martin Luther King’s action in the Civil Rights Movement. These were individuals who banned together as non-conformists to stand up against their government and society and took power into their own hands to influence the authority of the government. Another example is the 2011 Revolution in Egypt. As a result of the protests, President Mubarak stepped down. However non-conformity continues as several groups in Egypt still believe there is injustice. As a result of individuals choosing to disregard norms, individuals may benefit by developing a sense of identity and the wider society can remedy social issues and