There are many facts that prove that Kevin Latham purposefully burglarized Bernadette 's home, but is there more evidence that might help show that he isn 't the only person involved? Should he get another trial to see who else was in this with him? Latham was proven guilty because of the substantial evidence against him during his trial. On of the major evidences used against him were the three of four fingerprints belonging to him on a broken window in Bernadette 's home (2nd brief, Statement of facts, paragraph 16). These fingerprints give a huge clue that the appellant was in Bernadette 's home while she was away. Without her permission he couldn 't be in her home, the broken window proves that he wanted something, hence why he