The world is a very interesting place, with lots of different plant and animal species. While man has succeeded in identifying and classifying most of these organisms, some are still the products of speculations and conspiracy. An example is Bigfoot, or Sasquatch as it is referred to in some circles. This animal species, or entity, is a gorilla-like creature that is believed to exist by some, and dismissed as mere imagination and fantasy by others. Mystery surrounds the existence of big foot, and this fuels the speculation, making the existence of the creature a topic that has intrigued and interested anthropologists and enthusiasts in equal measure. Therefore, it is prudent to evaluate the existence of big foot, or lack thereof of, based on the hypothesis that big foot is merely a product of fiction without any scientific backing. One fact against the existence of big foot is the apparent lack of any fossil records or bone structure of a creature similar to big foot that has ever been excavated. If indeed big foot exists in the current world, then researchers could …show more content…
The perceived video and photo evidence depict it as a fairly massive animal, larger than modern man and in the same league as a grizzly bear. However, these photo and video evidences are always of poor quality, possibly the result of photo and video editing techniques. If indeed Sasquatch exists and is of the size depicted, then he would not have avoided valid and verifiable human sightings for so long. The contemporary world is made defined by phones that have cameras, and with everyone owning phones, it would have taken minutes for big foot to be sighted and recorded if he really existed. Additionally, he is presented as a diurnal animal, and this improved the chances for constant sightings if he really existed. However, the lack of constant and verifiable sightings possibly shows that Bigfoot is mere