ipl-logo

Bill Of Rights: No One Tried And Found Not Guilty

664 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The role of the bill of rights

Bill of rights paper

I am willing to give up the right that, no one tried and found not guilty can be tried again for the same crime. I would give this right up and keep all others because they could actually be guilty.If police find further evidence to prove they did the crime, it could help stop the bad people. And because of this law, they want have to go to jail for the crime. They just get free and not punished for a crime they actually did. I would rather get rid of this law, then get rid of all the other because the other law actually helps us. They help us keep order and freedom in a good way and help us run our country.

Guilty but free With this law it’s preventing people that could actually be guilty of the crime but before were not found guilty not having to be tried again. Being let free with no punishment and get to live a good life while the people that were hurt, killed, or stolen from get no justice. For example, say the judge finds this person innocent of a crime. Right after the judge says those words, that person stands up and tells the whole courthouse that he actually committed the crime. This person won't be charged or arrested because this law prevents them from being tried again for the same …show more content…

Take the O.J. Simpsons as an example, he was accused of murdering his wife and his wife's friend but was later found innocent. Police later found the possible murder weapon a knife that was missing at the crime scene. And was at Simpson's house with possible DNA evidence. They couldn't tried him twice so the ex-wife's family will never get justice or the truth about what really happened to their daughter. This law is more helping the guilty people than freeing the

Show More
Related

Carlos De Mamain Research Paper

815 Words | 4 Pages

Have you ever been accused of something you didn 't do? Stealing something, not doing your homework, etc... Well there are people all over America that have been accused of stealing, killing or other crimes that they did not commit, and they were severely punished for it. People like Claude Jones, Cameron Todd Willingham, and Larry Griffin, were all falsely accused and punished for a crime someone else committed. Some were even put away because there was false evidence provided.

Read More

Summary Of A Red Light For Scofflaws By Frank Trippett

524 Words | 3 Pages

Others believe that we should get rid of it because if humans make these mistakes you will be label to harshly for what you have done. Its as simple as if you don 't do the crime you won 't do the time. The

Read More

Bang Ban Monologue

141 Words | 1 Pages

Man this stuff is good are you ready to snort the next round, sure. Bang bang bang . Open the door it is time to eat.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Isaac Turnbaugh

1234 Words | 5 Pages

Unfortunately, there seem to be loopholes to such an obvious rule. How can someone allow another person to get away with murder? Isaac Turnbaugh. Some may not know the name, but it is by far the most ridiculous case that I have ever learned existed.

Read More

Bill Of Rights Dbq

429 Words | 2 Pages

When our founding fathers first created the Constitution it was found unworkable and had to have some changes before the ratification. In that process people began to have some differences such as the Federalist saw that the enhanced Constitution alone would protect all basic human rights. While Antifederalist saw that we needed an extra addition to the document that would genuinely give the basic rights, liberties, and limit the government from denouncing these rights and liberties from the people. The Bill of Rights was a necessary addition that has and will continue to protect the people from injustice in the government with the help of the Supreme Court.

Read More

Bill Of Rights Dbq

407 Words | 2 Pages

The Anti-Federalists were correct that a Bill of Rights was necessary to guard citizens from tyranny. To begin with, the Constitution is the framework for the organization of the U.S government and for the relationship the federal government with the states, citizens, and all people within the nation. When the United States was being born, the Founders adopted the first constitution to the nation called, Article of Confederation which created a central government that did not have much power and most of the power were given to the state government. However, the Article of Confederation was not working because there was no chief executive, no court system, and most important that was the central government could not force a state to pay taxes.

Read More

Bill Of Rights Dbq

366 Words | 2 Pages

Not everyone agrees with the government or if we should even have a government. What's the point of having rules, laws, someone in charge of running who could be unqualified? Each person in the government is protected by having for too much power. Every single person that has something to do with the federal government has some sort of power of someone. John Dickinson wrote The Articles of Confederation which were very weak and a disappointed to our country.

Read More

Bill Of Rights Dbq

267 Words | 2 Pages

After the Constitution was sent to states for ratification, the people felt the Constitution did not protect the natural rights of the American citizens. The cause or reason for this addition to the Constitution was to ensure that the rights detailed in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were not thought to be the only possible rights of American citizens. The Anti-Federalists, Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry, and George Mason, said that if certain rights weren't specifically granted to the people, the government would easily take over these rights and abuse the people in the country. The Federalists, George Washington, John Adams, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton, said that the Constitution give the government to do things that were

Read More

Bill Of Rights: The Miranda Vs. Wainright

401 Words | 2 Pages

The Bill of Rights, the document that gives us our rights, and helped formed today’s society. But it wasn’t always as spread out and fundamental as it is today. Over the years, the Supreme Court has extended our rights in many ways. The Miranda vs. Arizona and Gideon vs. Wainright are just a few examples of the Bill of Rights’ extension. First and foremost, the Amendments addressing rights related to court weren’t always fundamental, but were only in use for federal hearings.

Read More

Bill Of Rights Dbq

190 Words | 1 Pages

Thomas Jefferson once wrote to James Madison: "A bill of rights is what the people are entitled to against every government on earth" seeing that some Federalist was skeptical of the idea of listing rights. James Madison called it "parchment barrier" but regardless of his skepticism the declaration of rights was added to the US Constitution13. Initially, some amendments proposed by Madison were rejected including his "proposal to extend free speech protections to the States. " What followed were debates over spelling out what constituted the Bill of Rights, especially the "due process of law" preserved under the 14th Amendment. However, it was not until in 1925, in Gitlow vs. New York, 268 U.S. 652, did the US Supreme Court found

Read More

A Thin Blue Line By Errol Morris

1008 Words | 5 Pages

In other instances, like in Steven Truscott’s murder case, prosecutors pushed for the death penalty for the fourteen year old, as the death penalty would generate much more interest than life in prison. Truscott was later aquitted of the murder and the governement of Ontario awarded him 6.5 million in compensation.(Ontario Compensates Steven Truscott) When prosecutors push for a conviction for the purpose of getting a conviction and not the truth, a grave unjustice has been commited. Pushing for the death penalty and ignoring evidence of innocence causes courts to lose sight of the the truth. Our justice system must be reformed to prevent similar instances from happening in the future.

Read More

Bill Of Rights Dbq

1038 Words | 5 Pages

The Constitution, which was written in 1787, was not fully supported by the citizens of the United States (Buescher). Citizens of the United States felt that their natural rights regarding life and property were not being upheld or protected by the United States Constitution. From a response to these complaints came the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights, written by James Madison in 1789, holds the first 10 amendments, or alterations, to the United States Constitution. Madison, a member of the United States House of Representatives, proposed the Bill of Rights in response to requests from states and citizens who believed that the Constitution did not protect basic human individual liberties (Bobb).

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Ex Post Pursing Laws

156 Words | 1 Pages

Hello, Conrad. Overall great post. It is a positive thing that ex post facto laws exist because they balance the United States Constitution with criminal law. For instance, the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution protects an individual from double jeopardy. If a person could commit a crime, be punished for his or her offense, then retried, there would very little balance and trust in the law.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Wrongful Conviction

949 Words | 4 Pages

People plead guilty for crimes that are not committed by them to avoid trial, but by doing so the right decision wasn’t made.

Read More

Bill Of Rights Thesis

816 Words | 4 Pages

Purpose of Document Finish A bill of rights is a list of the most important rights to the citizens of a country. The purpose is to protect those rights against violation from public officials and or private citizens. The Bill of Rights was needed for the people to have their rights.

Read More

More about Bill Of Rights: No One Tried And Found Not Guilty

Related Topics

Open Document