ipl-logo

Billy Buyer Case Summary

506 Words3 Pages

Lahijani & Edelson LLP New York Attorney for Defendant: Saleh AlJurbua UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SALLY SELLER, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, v. BILLY BUYER Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff. 17-cv-1234 NOTICE OF MOTION PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, upon the annexed Affidavit of Billy Buyer, and Exhibit (A) annexed hereto, the accompanying Memorandum of Law, and all prior papers and proceedings herein, request that this Court dismiss Plaintiff Breach of contract claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). ---------------------------------- Lahijani & Edelson LLP Saleh AlJurbua Lahijani & Edelson LLP New York Defendant Attorney: Saleh AlJurbua …show more content…

RELEVANT CONTRACTUAL CLAUSE Clause 7.3 of the purchase agreement between the Defendant and the Plaintiff state that the parties are required to negotiate in good faith prior to commencing litigation. The purchase agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit A According to a recent New York federal court decision, “If a Plaintiff fails to exhaust requisite non-judicial remedies before filing a complaint, it is appropriate to dismiss the case pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). “ Du v. Hu, 524 F.3d 1299, 1302 (E.D.N.Y. 2008). The Plaintiff did not fulfill her contractual obligation to negotiate her claim with the Defendant prior to filing the lawsuit. The Defendant affidavit is attached herein. CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing fact, and as the Plaintiff did not fulfill her contractual obligations, Defendant requests the Court to dismiss this case complying with forgoing New York federal court decision. Date: New York, New York June 18,

Show More
Related
619 Words | 3 Pages

Date: June 24th, 2011 Re: Mrs. Hatter vs. Foods Deluxe DISCOVERY The plaintiff, Mrs. Hatter, by and through her counsel, Bruce Wayne, and pursuant to rule 34 requests defendant Foods Deluxe, respond to the following interrogatories, requests for admission, and requests for documents. I. Interrogatories 1. State the name of the person or persons answering these interrogatories. 2.

Read More
214 Words | 1 Pages

Nature of the Case: The amount of damages owed to a wrongfully discharged employee, when the promising entity chooses to not hold up their end of the contract instead attempting to mitigate the potential damages with an offer of employment in a lesser project. Facts: The Plaintiff, actress Shirley Maclaine was contracted with the defendant to perform in a musical called “Bloomer Girl”. However the defendant, Twentieth Century-Fox chose not to produce the film instead choosing to produce a western titled “Big Country, Big Man”.

Read More
955 Words | 4 Pages

The appellant essential accommodation claim went to trial but court excluded evidence regarding to disability. The plaintiff’s is not estopped by her SSDI and long term disability claims. However the issue should have been decided by jury. The court foreclosed to grant the plaintiff was not a qualified individual.

Read More
778 Words | 4 Pages

1. However, if for some reason this Court should want to overlook the Plaintiff’s error and apply Section 12-103 of the Family Law Article, this Court would have to perform the analysis required under this section where it should still deny the Plaintiff’s motion in that at this time the Court is unable to make such an analysis without making a determination that there is justification or absence of justification of either party for either party for bringing, maintaining, or defending the current proceedings. 2. Currently before the Court, both parties are seeking to be awarded legal costs under Section 12-103(a)(1), whereas the Defendant is also seeking fees under Section 12-12-103(a)(2)(iii), 12-103(c).

Read More
166 Words | 1 Pages

Russell Turner (Petitioner) brought causes of action against Smith 's Pharmacy (Respondent) for negligence, for failing act with reasonable care by providing prescription labels in large enough print, with knowledge that the Petitioner suffered from vision impairment. The court ruled in favor of Smith 's Pharmacy because Petitioner failed to establish the Respondents proximate cause— when Petitioner took a prescription he was uncertain of. The court held that it was unforeseeable to the pharmacist that the Petitioner would mistakenly take the wrong medication. The court applied the general elements for negligence: proof that a duty existed, the duty was breached, and the breach was the proximate cause of the harm. The question is whether a

Read More
1619 Words | 7 Pages

Throughout this case there are many different type of legal theories that can apply to a majority of the characters discussed. To start, Mike Merchant could be indicted of trademark infringement. A trademark is a distinctive mark, symbol, name, word, motto, or device that identifies the goods of a particular business. In the textbook there is a case that references a very similar situation to Mike’s; “When the manufacturer of knockoff goods offers a consumer a cheap knockoff copy of the original manufacturer’s more expensive product, allowing the buyer to acquire the prestige of owning what appears to be the more expensive product, there is infringement”. In reference to the case being studied Mike had told Suzy and Samuel that the Rolex watches and the Louis Vuitton (LV) bags were authentic with minor imperfections.

Read More
526 Words | 3 Pages

Michael Packer was in the market for a brand new car. He had been looking at the 2016 Ford Focus RS as well as the 2016 Audi R8 V10 Plus Coupé. After a lot of contemplating, he came to a decision. He went down to the Ford dealer and got a pre-built car because he is an impatient person. He walked around the white shiny showroom and he found the one he wanted, a Nitrous Blue Focus RS.

Read More
1635 Words | 7 Pages

The parties have not shifted responsibility of medical treatment, or payment thereof, to Medicare in contravention of 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1395y (b). The parties resolved this matter in compliance with both state and federal law. The parties made every effort to adequately protect Medicare’s interest and incorporate such into the settlement terms. Plaintiff and Releasors represent and warrant that all bills, costs or liens resulting from or arising out of Plaintiff’ and/or Releasors’ alleged injuries, claims or lawsuit are Plaintiff’ and Releasors’ responsibility to pay and Plaintiff and Releasors agree to fully satisfy any such bills, costs or liens, including but not limited to any Medicare and Medicaid liens out of the proceeds received from this settlement.

Read More
136 Words | 1 Pages

Bill Smith, a 36 years old employee of Western Company got laid off recently, because Laurier Company bought the Western Company and subsequently terminated 20 of Western’s employees. As part of the buyout agreement, it was promised that the severance package offered to the former Western employees would be equivalent to those offered to Laurier employees who had been terminated in the past year. And severance is determined by length of service with the company. Bill Smith has been working for Western Company for the past 10 years and he complained that his offer of 5 weeks’ severance pay was less than that offered to Laurier’s employees when they were laid off. In order to determine whether Bill is correct in his assessment of the severance

Read More
2254 Words | 10 Pages

D contended that its employees’ representations were statements of opinion and therefore not actionable. P’s fourth amended complaint was dismissed with prejudice and P appealed. Holding and

Read More
646 Words | 3 Pages

1. Larry Ingram is the CEO of a distribution company and Scott Patterson is a sales person for perfect solutions. Ingram is one of Patterson’s top distributors for Perfect Solution products. Ingram came to find that Patterson gave lower prices to another distribution company called Barber distributing. Patterson lies and says that he gave the same deal, when in actuality he didn’t.

Read More
167 Words | 1 Pages

The court sided with Drennan that there was no need for consideration to make a promise binding under an unilateral contract. Court also ruled that if there is a mistake that Drennan must know about mistake however, Drennan did not know and had no reason to believe that the bid submitted by Star Paving was a mistake. Star Paving failed to alleviate damages cause and that their argument was meritless (CaseBriefSummary.com, 2013). Court ruled that Star Paving did not present evidence that their bid was binding in exchange for Drennan use. The Trial Court awarded Drennan 3,817$ in damages.

Read More
163 Words | 1 Pages

Kate’s claim is that she was wrongfully dismissed from Specialty Detergent and that she should be awarded $500,000 for damages. Kate was not given reasonable notice of her termination from Specialty Detergent; despite of her skills, seniority (14 years of experience with the company), and age (55 years old). However, the other sales representative, Freddie, with 15 years of experience at Specialty Detergent had received a fair severance package with the inclusion of 12 months pay and benefits. Taking into consideration that Freddie and Kate had been working at Specialty Detergent for a similar period of time, had similar duties, and earned similar salaries; they should both receive equivalent severance packages.

Read More
261 Words | 2 Pages

Facts: Beacon (B) and Fox (F) ran movie theaters. B objected to F’s practice of exercising rights to be the first to show a movie before anyone else could. B pursued an anti-trust claim. In response, F sought a judicial declaration that F in fact had not run afoul of anti-trust rules, and that B would be enjoined from pursuing B’s claim until the matter in re the declaration could be heard by the court. But B filed an anti-trust counter claim.

Read More
1261 Words | 6 Pages

SAEED WILLIAMS PARALEGAL SERVICES GENERAL RETAINER AGREEMENT I __________________________________ On _______________________ hereby retain Saeed Williams Paralegal Services “SWP” as our Paralegal for legal advice and representation on the following matter; ♦ Tort and Contract Law ♦ Employment Law ♦ Real Estate ♦ Provincial Offences ♦ Human Rights Subject to our written instructions, we request that Saeed Williams Paralegal Services take any actions that Saeed Williams Paralegal Services deems necessary and appropriate to assist us on completing the Retainer. 1. Client’s Responsibilities The Client understands that in order to be properly represented SWP has an expectation of client integrity that must be withheld. SWP expects

Read More

More about Billy Buyer Case Summary

Open Document