ipl-logo

Blaise Paschal's Wager Argument Analysis

799 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The relationship between good and evil

Blaise Paschal was a French mathematician and philosopher who building an argument on why one should believe in God, it is named Paschal’s Wager. According to Paschal’s Wager, it is better to have a belief in God than not believing in Him. God is known for punishing those who go against or do not believe in Him. Therefore, Paschal stated you should believe in God because after death you can be rewarded with an eternity in heaven. However, if you do not believe in God and he does exist you will be damned to the eternal suffering that is brought by hell. There is no way in proving that the Wager will succeed or not because the only way in knowing whether God is real or not is if you die. The only argument a Christian can propose is to just have faith that he exists …show more content…

David Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion Part XI tried to explain why there is so much evil in the world we live in if we have and all powerful God that can stop all evil if He wanted to. So Hume begs the question well, if God cannot stop evil since evil in inevitable to happen, then God is not all-powerful. From this question, since God is all-powerful and does not stop evil from happening, then we have a malevolent God who is evil. But, what if God does not know when evil is going to happen? This means that God would not be all knowing and not omniscient. From these questions, Hume comes to a conclusion that God is indifferent about His creations and allows evil to just happen in the world that he created. The only support the Wager has is the support of Christian belief. There is no evidence that is brought into the claim other than just making the claim if God is real and you do not believe, you will suffer in hell for all of eternity. Where Hume provides evidence by showing how to prevent evil is in our

Show More
Related

David Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion

3370 Words | 14 Pages

In Dialogues concerning Natural religion Hume explores whether or not faith is rational. as a result of Hume is AN philosopher (i.e. somebody WHO thinks that every one information comes through experience), he thinks that a belief is rational given that it's sufficiently supported by experiential proof. therefore the question is absolutely, is there enough proof within the world to permit North American country to infer AN infinitely sensible, wise, powerful, excellent God? Hume doesn't raise whether or not we are able to rationally prove that God exists, however rather whether or not we are able to rationally return to any conclusions regarding God's nature. He asserts that the primary question is on the far side doubt; the latter is ab initio undecided.

Read More

The Wager Rhetorical Analysis

739 Words | 3 Pages

He introduces the idea with a game, a simple wager of " heads or tails". However, in his game, one side of the coin represents the belief that God exist, while the other means that God does not exist. What we bet on in Pascal's Wager is also more than your ordinary school yard gamble with higher stake. In this wager, betting our entire lives, as well as the infinite beyond which we live on this

Read More

Wager's Argument For The Existence Of God

378 Words | 2 Pages

The ontological argument states that perfection is a part of the concept of God, and that perfection entails existence, and so the concept of God entails God’s existence. However, it can be argued that if God is an infinite goodness, then its contrary, evil, should not exist. Alas, there is evil in the world, and, therefore, God cannot exist. The ontological argument also seeks to demonstrate that God exists on the basis of concept alone. Pascal’s Wager attempts to justify the belief in God with an

Read More

Pascal's Waager Rhetorical Analysis

619 Words | 3 Pages

All in all, after examining the arguments that have been put forward against Pascal’s Wager, the wager fails to provide acceptable reasons as to why claiming to believe in God will be beneficial to those who are believing in God

Read More

David Hume's Compatibilist Position On Free Will

1006 Words | 5 Pages

Introduction: The debate over free will has been one of the most enduring and contentious issues in philosophy. At the heart of this debate lies the tension between determinism, the view that all events, including human actions, are causally decided by prior events and conditions, and free will, the belief that individuals can make choices and act freely. While some philosophers argue that determinism and free will are incompatible, others, such as David Hume, have tried to reconcile these seemingly contradictory positions through a compatible view of free will. In this paper, I will argue in favor of Hume's compatibilist position on free will by exploring its key features and addressing some of the challenges it faces.

Read More

B. C. Johnson's Argument For The Existence Of God

1292 Words | 6 Pages

Evil and the existence of God has been at the heart of philosophical arguments for years. It seems that evil should cancel out God’s existence. Evil is defined in two ways. One definition is evil as gratuitous suffering. B.C. Johnson uses this in his argument against the existence of a monotheistic God.

Read More

Mackie's Evil And Omnipotence

933 Words | 4 Pages

At the beginning of the article, Mackie states that the initial issue with God’s existence is that, “God is omnipotent; God is wholly good; and yet evil exists” (Mackie, Paragraph 3). If god is such a pure and good being, then he should be able to combat all evil. The first statement that showcases that God is omnipotent, God is wholly good, then evil cannot possibly exist. The definition of omnipotent is

Read More

Voltaire On Religion

1596 Words | 7 Pages

Religion and its Fallibility under the Scrupulous Light of Rational Inquiry: the Satirical Critiques of Voltaire and George Bernard Shaw For those perplexed by the overabundance of evil in the world, religion has always provided an avenue for hope, and people throughout history have sought God for understanding, and reconciliation. If God, by definition, is omnibenevolent, omnipotent, and omniscient, how do we account for the immense suffering, evil, and injustice that exists in the world? Moreover, a world with an astronomical amount of pain and unnecessary suffering? Could such evil exist and the existence of the aforementioned God still be plausible? To address the problem of evil, philosophers and theologians have put forth theodicies,

Read More

JL Mackie's Argument For The Existence Of God?

295 Words | 2 Pages

JL Mackie was persuasive in his argument by showing that belief in an almighty God is not rational. He proves this by posing the problem of evil. According to JL Mackie, if God exists and is omniscient, omnipotent, and good then evil would not exist. However, evil exists in this world, sometimes in the form of undeserved suffering (diseases that affect humans, earthquakes, famines ...) and others perpetrated by man (murders, wars ...). If God exists and has the capability to be powerful, good, omniscient and omnipotent, why would he let evil be perpetrated?

Read More

Problem Of Evil Argument

1279 Words | 6 Pages

In this paper, I will begin by stating the Problem of Evil. Following this I will include two objections to the argument and why I find the argument to not be convincing. The Problem of Evil is an argument concerning the existence of God and why God cannot exist because of the presence of evil in the world. The argument begins by saying that God is both all-powerful and wholly good, and that evil exists in the world. However, these statements contradict each other, so all three cannot be true.

Read More

David Hume Research Paper

1310 Words | 6 Pages

Furthermore, Hume declares that since the mind is not physically able to determine rational and abstract truths then humans should not worry about them. Some of these truths were the mortality of the soul or if there even is a God. One of Hume’s biggest problems with this world was the aspect of causation. Causation is defined as the belief that particular events lead to one another in predictable ways. He earnestly tried to disprove the law that states that no matter how many times something is done, there is still never a one hundred percent chance that it will happen the same way if done again.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Descartes And Hume

1404 Words | 6 Pages

Hume on the other hand can only confirm what has already happened, being that is the most truthful and logical

Read More

David Hume's Argument Analysis

639 Words | 3 Pages

Hume’s expresses this argument in two different ways one is a deductive argument called the, “logical problem with evil which shows that god necessarily does not exist” (Velasquez, 2014p.262). The second is an inductive or probable argument called the,

Read More

The Argument For The Problem Of Evil

929 Words | 4 Pages

A lot of arguments have been known to prove or disprove the existence of God, and the Problem of Evil is one of them. The Problem of Evil argues that it is impossible to have God and evil existing in the same world. Due to ideal characteristics of God, evil should not have a chance to exist and make human suffer. In this essay, I will examine the argument for the Problem of Evil, a possible theodicy against the argument, and reply to the theodicy. First of all, to be clear, the Problem of Evil is an argument that shows that God cannot be either all- powerful, all-knowing, and/or all good.

Read More

Hume Miracles Analysis

967 Words | 4 Pages

Most humans have to a certain extent been brainwashed about the possibility of miracles. For example, there is no proof of Moses splitting the water in half, it is not only hearsay but also impossible. Furthermore, if splitting the water was possible, how come it has not happened again since? Supporters of miracles could argue and say that miracles happen once and the probability of it happening again are slim to none. However, the possibility of someone winning the lottery is extremely low; but, multiple people have been witnessed to win; thus, it is possible.

Read More

More about Blaise Paschal's Wager Argument Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document