Books And Food Rhetorical Analysis

In order to have better life people should get an educational degree and work in their field major. However, how if these students are forced to quit education and choose a very simple daily thing in life which is food. Otherwise, should not have to choose between education or food because education is very significant for their career path and their living condition. In the article “students should not choose between Books and Food,” by Clare Cady on February 28, 2016, author’s claim is that students have to be supported to get rid of hunger in the campuses. Therefore, Cady’s purpose is to make her audience who are educators and have high education level aware to solve students’ poverty. In addition to that, Cady’s evidences are very effective because she provides many of them such as statistics, factual examples, and personal experiences to make her audience realize that students must have the opportunity to continue their education.

For instance, she interviewed a student that “she had not eaten and was worried about being evicted,” (Cady, Para.1). Therefore, I think by talking to someone has the same problem, where they would feel weak lethargic, dizzy, helpless. When students are hungry, they are unable to concentrate on their studies; therefore, their performance is lacking quality that would be more effective in their studies and therefore career. In order to that problem administrators, government, and professors are responsible to seek for a solution like opening food security programs, that could provide these students the relief, so they can continue their