ipl-logo

Brief Overview Of The 13 Major Court Cases

1298 Words6 Pages

Anika Rusche
Mr. Smith & Mr. Persuad
Social Studies
8 June 2023
The Thirteen Major Court Cases
There are 13 major Supreme Court cases that have occurred which led the United States to how it is now. If our judges chose the other side of the argument would our world be different now? More Than 200 years ago our Founding Fathers, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay published a series of essays prodding the ratification of the United States Federalist Papers now known as the Constitution. The Federalist Party came about around 1789 - 1790 as a group of businessmen who supported the same cause. This led to the U.S. Constitution and our National Laws. Our Laws hold the core values of the Nation and how the people in the Nation should …show more content…

They can relate to businesses, education, safety, housing, food, public speech, environmental rights, etc. The laws could restrict us from doing things and keep us safe. How different would our world be now if we didn't have these laws, and how would we keep the nation from crumbling?
There are thirteen court cases that had an impact on the United States. The first case was Marbury v. Madison then it led to Fletcher v. Peck, McCulloch v. Maryland, Dartmouth College v. Woodward, Gibbons v. Ogden, Worcester v. Georgia, Commonwealth v. Hunt, Dred Scott v. Sandford, Slaughterhouse Case, U.S. v. Cruickshank, U.S. v. Reese, Munn v. Illinois, and Plessy v. Ferguson.
The first case, Marbury v. Madison, was held in 1803 as a John Marshall case. Chief Justice John Marshall established the judicial review. Information can be cited in
Infobase Learning - Login, online.infobase.com/HRC/Search/Details/2?articleId=358306&q=+Marbury+v.+Madison. Accessed 1 June …show more content…

Commonwealth v. Hunt was used in American law in which the Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled that the common law doctrine of criminal conspiracy did not apply to labor and the decision was made by Lemuel Shaw. Only 15 years after the court case Dred Scott v. Stanford was held. in 1857 Roger B. Taney was presented with a case of slavery. An enslaved Black man named Dred Scott and his wife Harriet Scott were sued for their freedom in St. Louis Circuit Court. Stanford owned Dred Scott, but later on, Stanford passed down ownership to his daughter who later moved to a Northern State where Slavery/owning of others was illegal. Stanford's daughter goes to the Supreme Court where Roger Taney runs the case and allows her to bring her slave as property. Although the North wasn't happy they couldn't do much as the thirteenth and fourteenth amendments didn't say you were free to do anything nor free to do nothing. This information can be found

Show More
Related

Summary Of The Nine By Jeffey Toobin

1358 Words | 6 Pages

Clinton respected this view, and appointed Breyer to the court. Breyer’s first major case was United States v. Lopez. This case was created to potentially eliminate weapons around schools. This case brought the idea of a strong government to the floor. This case was brought up by the Federalist Society, who had started a new movement called the Constitution in Exile.

Read More

Supreme Court Cases: The Mapp V. Ohio Case

621 Words | 3 Pages

Mapp v. Ohio Throughout the last 70 years, there have been many cases that the U.S. Supreme Court has decided upon leading to many advancements in the U.S. Constitution. Many of the cases have created laws that we still use today. In the case I chose, Dollree Mapp was convicted of possessing obscene materials, four little pamphlets, a couple of photos, and a little pencil doodle, after an illegal police search of her home for a suspected bomber. No suspect was found, but she was arrested.

Read More

Summary Of Gerald Rosenberg's Book 'The Hollow Hope'

710 Words | 3 Pages

Alex Frost Values: Law & Society 9/23/2014 The Hollow Hope Introduction and Chapter 1 Gerald Rosenberg begins his book by posing the questions he will attempt to answer for the reader throughout the rest of the text: Under what conditions do courts produce political and social change? And how effective have the courts been in producing social change under such past decisions as Roe v. Wade and Brown v. Board of Education? He then works to define some of the principles and view points 'currently' held about the US Supreme court system.

Read More

Essay On Pete Rose In The Hall Of Fame

543 Words | 3 Pages

Accessed 23 Jan.

Read More

Marbury Vs Madison Case In 1803

775 Words | 4 Pages

Jessica Goodier CJUS 101 Kyung Jhi 6 November 2014 The Marbury versus Madison case in 1803 is one of the first Supreme Court cases to apply the judicial review rule. Judicial review is a document in which legislative and executive actions are sent to review the judiciary. This principle was written by Chief Justice John Marshall in 1803. His decision led the Supreme Court become a separated branch in the government.

Read More

John Marshall's Three Main Court Cases

811 Words | 4 Pages

John Marshall had a significant impact on strengthening the national government during his term as Chief Justice from 1800-1830. Marshall achieved this goal by strengthening the power of the Supreme Court in three main court cases. In Marbury v. Madison Marshall established the practice of judicial review, then in McCulloch v. Maryland he weakened the central government and Gibbons v. Ogden provided the federal government with the ability to regulate interstate commerce. Marbury v. Madison (1803) was a court case that began the practice of judicial review. This case started because the night before President John Adams term ended, he appointed 42 justices of the peace.

Read More

Dred Scott And Ryland Case

451 Words | 2 Pages

Dred Scott was ruled a slave. The next day Mrs. Emerson’s attorneys went to St. Louis Circuit Court to file bonds signed by

Read More

Dred Scott V. Sanford Case

138 Words | 1 Pages

Dred Scott was a slave who sued his owner. He claimed he was free because his previous owner had taken him to Illinois (a free state) where he argued before the court that Congress had banned slavery by the Missouri Compromise of 1820. The state of Missouri ended up finding Scott was going to be a slave, even though the previous decisions by Missouri favored the Emancipation Proclamation because slavery has become very popular within expansion issues and compromise issues. The Dred Scott v. Sanford case is an early example of the Court’s involvement in race relations, new attitudes arise that would be changed by the Civil War, and the civil rights movement. Abolitionists were livid.

Read More

Civil War Dbq Essay

1104 Words | 5 Pages

Southerners believed they had a right to have slaves on their land because they technically owned them as property and going against the Fifth Amendment would be unconstitutional. A few cases, such as the Dred Scott case, tried to counter this statement. In the Dred Scott case, a man named Dred Scott, who lived in Missouri, was taken from his home and moved to Minnesota, which was a free state. He argued that since he was living in a free state, he should be free. However, Roger B. Taney, the Supreme Court Justice of this case, ruled that Congress never had the right to prohibit slavery in any territory and that “free territory” did not really exist.

Read More

Summary Of The Dred Scott Case

776 Words | 4 Pages

During the early-to-mid 1800s, the North and South had begun to seriously argue on the issue of slavery. While the South were in favor of keeping slavery, the North could not wait to be rid of it. The decision of the Dred Scott case would be known as an important event which would spark the friction between the North and South to rise drastically. Dred Scott, an African American slave, sued for his freedom because he had lived in a free state for most of his time in the United States. In the ruling at Supreme Court, Chief Justice Taney had ruled that because he was an African American slave, Dred Scott could not sue for the reason that Scott was not a citizen and that he was property.

Read More

Marbury Vs Madison 1803

157 Words | 1 Pages

Marbury v. Madison is important in the American political system. Back in 1803, Chief Justice John Marshall wrote the majority opinion. Marshall supported a strong national government. He ruled that the Court could not order Madison to give Marbury the commission because the Judiciary Act of 1789. This marked as the first time the Supreme Court declared that a law passed

Read More

Marshall Court Dbq

1063 Words | 5 Pages

(Document B). John Jay dismissed President John Adams proposal, for he knew John Marshall would bring these positive elements to the Court better than himself. John Marshall was elected to the Supreme Court a few months following this event. Another impact John Marshall made concerning the judicial branch was in the Court case Marbury v. Madison in 1803, which addressed the judicial branch’s authority over laws. The Supreme Court decided that it was the, “duty of the judicial department to say what the law is” (Document C).

Read More

Civil War Dbq

1098 Words | 5 Pages

Dred Scott was a slave that attempted to sue for his freedom. The case rose to the Supreme Court, and justices ruled in 1857 that slaves were mere property, with none of the rights or recognition assumed to human beings. This decision threatened to overturn the entire basis of the laws that had hitherto managed to prevent a civil war. The classification of slaves as property rose question to the authority of the government to regulate this institution. The Southern states once again challenged the territorial confines of slavery and opposition intensified.

Read More

Why The Judicial Branch Is The Most Powerful

478 Words | 2 Pages

Madison court case that took place in 1803. The law that was declared by the Supreme Court at this hearing was that a court has the power to declare an act of Congress void if it goes against the Constitution. This case took place because President John Adams had appointed William Marbury as justice of the peace in the District of Columbia, and the new president, Thomas Jefferson, did not agree with this decision. William Marbury was not appointed by the normal regulation, which was that the Secretary of State, James Madison, needed to make a notice of the appointment. James Madison did not follow through and make a notice of Marbury’s appointment; therefore, he sued James Madison, which was where the Supreme Court came in place.

Read More

Supreme Court Case Essay

537 Words | 3 Pages

Dred Scott was sued for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived for a time in a "free" territory. The Court ruled against him, saying that under the Constitution, he was his master 's property. The people involved with this court case are the Supreme Court,Dred Scott, and Chief Justice Roger B. The final judgment for this case ended up in Dred Scott 's favor.

Read More

More about Brief Overview Of The 13 Major Court Cases

Related Topics

Open Document