Brief Therapy Paper

To this theory, diagnosis and other measures are not found to be important compared to addressing issues on being. Furthermore, there are different settings that the existential therapist may use; Brief therapy is a technique used for clients who are able to make a commitment to being an active client. This approach is used when the therapist and client have both agreed that this type of therapy is right for this case and even though it requires more structuring to complete this short-term session, it is possible that the client would need to come back for further treatment when some issues do not have time to be addressed. Another technique is the application of group counseling when the client’s commitment is a life long journey of searching

This theory is concerned with going through this progression with the client and helping he/she assume accountability for their own life. By creating this relationship based on mutual respect, the client will initially allow this process to be effective, allowing the therapist to challenge the thought process, and to allow the client to feel safe. Hoffman (2015) mentions, “To accomplish this, therapists develop a strong therapeutic alliance, create a safe environment for the clients to enter their emotions, and encourage clients to move into their emotions at a safe pace” (p. 15). The initial relationship is stressed; after all, this encounter can change both the client and the therapist. Clients who come in with questions of angst are protuberant, because psychological interventions can be intervened when clients are searching for meaning. According to Vos (2014), “Existential therapies are a group of psychological interventions that explicitly address questions about existence, and they assume that, by overcoming existential distress, psychopathology may be decreased or prevented” (p. 115). Existential psychotherapy is the attitude toward human suffering without a manual. ET’s main advantage is the client-therapist relationship. A shortcoming, however, is not following any set theories and relying only on the therapeutic

Contrary to ET, FST focus on theories and approaches to find links between family and individual problems. With this systematic approach, the therapist is able to lead all the family members into positive welfare. Therapist cultural values may limit the effectiveness when working with clients of differing values. Even if there are differences in culture therapist are able to still provide unbiased and efficient resources for families to better cope with challenges. FST can be challenging when facing multicultural counseling because there are some families who find expression to be shameful to their heritage and may lie to keep the problems within a family. This cultural difference might lead to frustration by the family because they are shamed for openly discussing issues to resolve conflict. FST was very effective with their methods and lead to solving relational complexities. According to Lebow (2016), “research has suggested that family interventions produce clinically significant change across a number of different approaches and has not indicated that one approach is more effective than the others” (p. 339). If all family members do not guarantee participation, progress may be hindered. The therapist must display a good family origin or else the therapist is a high risk for reflecting his or her own issues onto the client and their