ipl-logo

Brooks Vs Northwood Little League Case Summary

718 Words3 Pages

In the case of Brooks vs. Northwood Little League has little relevance to my profession as a future sports psychologist. Overall I do not think I will be in this exact situation but I can take some learning opportunities from this case. I learned in my case that anyone can be sued for negligence but you have to prove the four elements of negligence in order to win. In my case of Brooks vs. Northwood Little League, Brooks sued for negligence and lost her case. Brooks lost this case because she couldn’t prove all four parts of negligence. As a future professional in sports psychology, I have learned a lot about defending myself against a lawsuit of negligence. This doesn’t mean I can represent myself in court but I can tell the difference between a good lawyer and a bad one. In being a sports psychologist I will take on many roles in my future career, depending on where I am. I can have higher levels of standard of care …show more content…

I have learned a lot with all the legal laws and doing the correct things to protect myself from being sued, but with my morals, that’s not enough. As a person, I want to make sure I am protecting my players as much as possible. In this case when Brooks injured her ankle in a water run-off trench on the way bay from the concession stand. Knowing this environment a scene was created and the players we distracted from the game. I am taking this to the next level by trying to prevent distractions for my players and the well-being of my players. If Brooks was the Grandmother of one of my future athletes I know they would be concerned about the safety of their Grandmother. This class has made me reexamine my morals and ethics when looking at it with a legal issues lens. This case of Brooks vs. Northwood Little League has shown me that accidents are going to happen all the time. Injuries are going to occur in this field because it’s the nature of the

Show More
Related
792 Words | 4 Pages

On 11/07/2017, the agent received a Law Enforcement Contact form indicating offender Joe A. Slugger was at the K&D Tap on 11/06/2017 having unauthorized contact with Sandra Williams. It was stated in the LEC form that Joe Slugger was drinking alcohol and will be referred for the charge of felony Substantial Battery by Badger Police Department after he was witnessed to hit Sandra Williams with his open right hand to Sandra William’s left side of her face and then grab Sandra Williams by the back of her head and slamming her head onto the bar counter where she was seated. Sandra Williams was observed having a visible red mark on her face and a laceration on her forehead that later required eight stitches. On 11/08/2017, the agent received a police report from Badger Police Department Officer Konkol (Case number 1-98-00456723) stating Officer Konkol and Officer Sandner were dispatched to the K&D Tap (223 W. main Street, Badger WI) where they made contact with Joe Slugger.

Read More
652 Words | 3 Pages

The issue presented in this case is whether the San Francisco Giants was negligent when Janice Lewis was pushed and fell on the top of the metal bars during the parade. The San Francisco Giants Will be found negligence of San Francisco Giants breached the parade duty to its patrons and, as a result of that breach, Janice Lewis was injured. McGarry v. Sax, 70 Cal. Rptr.

Read More
969 Words | 4 Pages

Whereby the defendants failed to use a level of due care to all skiers and snowboarders. Background facts which can be used in a motion summary judgment based on the affirmative defense of primary assumption of risk. In cases of (Knight v. Jewett 1992) 3 Cal.app.4th 296, the court concluded that assumption is primary or secondary “Primary assumption of risk refers to instances where “there is ‘no duty’ on the part of the defendant to protect the plaintiff from a particular risk,” or [harm].pg. 309. Even though Knight case involved injuries occurring during a game of tough football, clearly from the guideline applies other than sports, but other activities involving as inherent risk of injury to voluntary participants like the plaintiff’s, where the risk cannot be eliminated without altering the fundamental nature of the activity. [Citation].

Read More
364 Words | 2 Pages

Demar v. Chicago White Sox Facts: The plaintiff, Demar, is disable and attended a baseball game at the defendant’s stadium 9CWS). At the conclusion of the game Demar remained seated in order to wait for the long lines at the restroom and elevators to subside .CWS policy is for all attendees to leave the stadium immediately upon ending of the game plaintiff was informed by security personnel to leave. Plaintiff refused to move therefore security allegedly took possession of his cane and forcibly brought Demar to the stadium ambulance. Plaintiff was taken to the hospital where he refused to be examined or treated.

Read More
576 Words | 3 Pages

a. What happened? Sarah Adams-Cornell and Jacqueline Holder, Chair Person of Parental Invovolment of Oklahoma City Schools, addressed McLoud to change their mascot name due to the negative effect it might have on their Native American Students. Mcloud acknowledged the issue and after seeing support from the local community and a local native american tribe, it was decided that would keep the name the Redskins. b. What was the ruling/decesion?

Read More
1361 Words | 6 Pages

Sports Law Midterm I. (A) After reviewing the case that was given to us, I do not believe we have enough valuable information to fully comprehend what had happen that night Sarah Smith got struck in the head with a hockey puck. But given what we do know, there is no way that Sarah’s estate can bring a claim against the Blue’s organization for hiring Kyle Albert. It was clearly an accident, there was no way Albert had intentionally deflected the puck into the stands to purposely hit Sarah. On the other hand, Sarah’s estate can bring a claim to the Blue’s organization for owning the hockey arena because it obviously wasn’t a safe area for fans to be in.

Read More
562 Words | 3 Pages

District Court Decision The trial judge, Hungerford ADCJ, found against the Plaintiff for the following reasons: 1) That the playing field was consistent with acceptable { OL 66 }standards for playing sports such as Oztag and that accordingly all particulars of negligence against the Defendants had not been made out. 2) That Oztag was a “dangerous recreational { OL 66 }activity” within the meaning of ss 5K and 5L of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (New South Wales), which meant that the { OL 66 }Defendants { OL 66 }could not be liable in negligence for harm suffered by the Plaintiff as a result of the materialisation of the obvious risk of a dangerous recreational activity engaged in by the

Read More
970 Words | 4 Pages

Supreme Court cases can shape our national laws; it can shape an American citizen’s future. Without them, the Bill of Rights could be left up for our own interpretation. This could cause unfair laws and create havoc. In 1966, a court case named Kent vs United Sates took place. This case could create the ability to shape a juvenile's life forever.

Read More
1062 Words | 5 Pages

Weisman talks about the fact that it is accepted to risk someone’s health in sports, but if it had been medicine-related one would think about the risks twice (Weisman, par. 17). Weisman talks about the fact that it is morally okay to look the other way if the society gets entertained by sports, but old rituals or dogfights are not accepted (Weisman, par. 20). Weisman believes that sports helmets should be better to protect athletes’ brains, especially in football where there are examples of athletes who got brain injuries from the sport (Weisman, par.

Read More
448 Words | 2 Pages

“Lost Innocence” by Jeremy Bernard is about the innocence of baseball and how it was lost by the use of PED drugs. George Mitchell and Eric Walter argue on this topic. They agree with one thing, that there is a risk to health. But they disagree on the risk that it places to adults, and who should be the one to make a decision, if the risks are worthy enough that someone should do something. Walter argues that there is no information that a harm comes from using the drugs, but Mitchell takes a different turn; since there is no evidence so far of the drug then it should not be allowed.

Read More
910 Words | 4 Pages

Responsibility is a toss up between people not wanting to take control of one’s actions. A current ethical and cultural debate is the issue of who should be held primarily responsible for reducing concussions in high school sports, the parents, coaches, equipment manufacturers or with the school administration. In the video, Big Hits Broken Dreams by CNN, the superintendent of the school system in Pitts county said she felt some responsibility for Jaquan Waller’s death in the fact that the school system could have implemented programs to protect the players. At the same time, the coach of the team felt as though he was responsible, because he let Waller continue to play on the field even though a certified athletic trainer had not checked him

Read More
1039 Words | 5 Pages

This court case is based off the legal concept of Negligence. Negligence is defined as “A failure to behave with the level of care that someone of ordinary prudence would have exercised under the same circumstances. The behavior usually consists of actions, but can also consist of omissions when there is some duty to act” (Negligence). Negligence is at the heart of every trail especially when dealing with sports related trials. Article #1

Read More
600 Words | 3 Pages

“He’s at the 40, 30, 20, 10! Oooh, I don’t think he’s getting up from that hit.” Recreational and professional football players are fun to watch, but these players have higher risks of injuries, that they are willing to put on the line. As a soon to be parent, I would hesitate to let my son play football because of the obvious warning signs shown, consequences of playing, and the devastations of the injuries. On the stands, fans are going crazy and enjoying their time watching two hundred to four hundred pound men aggressively beat each other.

Read More
980 Words | 4 Pages

The parents believed that their children should play regardless of their athletic ability. However Klosterman argues to the parents that this was unprofessional,

Read More
971 Words | 4 Pages

“In the U.S., about 30 million children and teens participate in some form of organized sports, and more than 3.5 million injuries each year” claims Stanford Children’s Health. It’s definitely true that competitive sports can cause all sorts of injuries from big to small. The media teaches people simply that sports leads to horrific injuries and can cause stress, but what the mainstream media hardly discusses are the great benefits of competitive sports. While there may be some negatives to competitive sports, that’s just life, and to add on to that; there are plenty of benefits which are sure to override to media’s facts. Kids should play competitive sports because competitive sports teach children powerful life lessons, contributes to their social and mental stability, and because of the physical gain competitive sports provides.

Read More

More about Brooks Vs Northwood Little League Case Summary

Open Document