ipl-logo

Brutus Aesar Qualities

1432 Words6 Pages

Character. It’s what can make or break someone. Character is what millions of jobs and careers look for in a person that is applying to their company. If he or she does not have the specific leadership or even speaking qualities the CEO’s or the bosses won’t even consider hiring you. For example, if a man applies to work at a law firm and he is a pushover and hates public speaking the company won’t hire him because he does not fit their description. Language and leadership qualities were also very important back in Shakespeare's time. In William Shakespeare’s play called The Tragedy of Julius Caesar he introduces a very important character named Brutus. He is very well known because of his top notch attributes and skills and many if not all …show more content…

Although Antony, Caesar’s right hand man has a lot of positive attributes to be a great leader, Brutus’s commitment to the overall good of the people and his persuasiveness make him the stronger choice.
Part 1: Brutus the Leader Brutus has always been a strong candidate in the eyes of his Roman people. They see him for his great honor and determination and they know him as someone they can genuinely trust. He’s first proven himself as honorable when he says “Be not deceived.Of I have veiled my look, / I turn the trouble of my countenance/ Merely upon myself. Vexed I am/ Of late with passions of some difference, /. . . that poor Brutus, with himself at war, / forgets the shows of love to other men,” (I.ii.37-47). By this Brutus tells his friend Cassius not to take his recent behavior personally, because he is at war with himself and is so overwhelmed by his inner conflicts. In this scene Brutus has not even considered becoming the Roman leader, but he is already drained from the heavy burden of leadership. This connects to Guy Roberts’s TED talk To Lead or Not to Lead: Changing the World with Shakespeare. In Guy’s talk he describes the leadership characteristics and some of the consequences that leadership can bring. Guy explains “Something we

Show More
Related
548 Words | 3 Pages

Brutus also has a position in the government of Rome. He also had many tragic flaws like one which is trusting others. He trusted the conspirators and even Mark Antony. Another one is that Brutus is very idealistic meaning if would have known the consequences of murdering Caesar would be, then Antony would not have had to talk to at the funeral. For example,“ Now let it work.

Read More
662 Words | 3 Pages

Character defines a man. Dwight D. Eisenhower said, “The qualities of a great man are vision, integrity, courage, understanding, the power of articulation, and profundity of character. " Character strength correlates into leadership ability. History provides examples of men with good and bad character. Hitler was a man who was a very effective leader as he gathered followers early on, but his character was weak, making his success short lived.

Read More
1556 Words | 7 Pages

One of his very first, and most common productions being Julius Caesar. In every act of Shakespeare’s plays, there is a leader that shows skills that make him or her perfect for their job. In Julius Caesar, one of these leaders in Marc Antony. Marc Antony would be a strong leader because he has two important traits that the audience can see through his words and actions throughout the play. He is fiercely loyal, to his friends, countrymen, leaders, and to Rome.

Read More
770 Words | 4 Pages

Fee-for-service (FFS) and capitated reimbursement schedules are two distinct models used in healthcare to determine payment for services rendered. With the FFS payment method, services are unbundled and health care providers are paid for separately for each individual service performed. On the other hand, capitation is a quality-based payment model in which health care providers are paid a predetermined, set amount of money to covered the approximated cost of services provided for a specific patient per period of time. There are advantages and disadvantages to either model which I will discuss below. Fee-for-service (FFS)

Read More
893 Words | 4 Pages

Does a hero know when they will fall to their own mistakes? Many men and women throughout history have been defined as tragic heroes and died because of the mistakes they have made in their lifetime. One of these men is Marcus Brutus. Brutus had many flaws and mistakes that he made in his judgment of people and his logic. One of these many flaws was the fact he put himself above the people around him because of his political standing and education.

Read More
504 Words | 3 Pages

In conclusion, Brutus is not a villain. His conscience tells him that what he did was wrong and something had to be done about it, which ends in him killing himself. He shows lots of compassion throughout The Tragedy of Julius Caesar(JC) by William

Read More
763 Words | 4 Pages

He was courageous when killing Caesar for the people of Rome. He had integrity when making unselfish decisions and joining the conspiracy only for the citizens. Lastly, he was kind when making choices no matter how risky, but only with good intentions of others. The citizens of Rome craved the leadership of someone with courage, integrity, and kindness Brutus possessed. Brutus was the leader who could step up to the plate and be

Read More
606 Words | 3 Pages

Brutus believes that Caesar will do more harm than good to the people, and reap benefits for himself. Brutus has already said this, but had said it in his own words, (II, i, 12-14). He has no clue if Caesar will use his power for the good and betterment for the people, or use it for his own needs and other

Read More
572 Words | 3 Pages

The Tragedy of Julius Caesar is written by William Shakespeare. This play is about a true historical event with minor tweaks here and there. Shakespeare makes Marcus Brutus the tragic hero in this play. He is faced with the decision to kill his best friend or to let him possibly become a dictator. Brutus being the tragic hero had to have some tragic flaws.

Read More
705 Words | 3 Pages

While my qualifications consist of more than my character, I personally believe it is my most important one, as it is the reason that I can even say I possess all of the traits I have, and it works in concert with my leadership. Anybody who knows me will tell you I am a very personable, extroverted, humourous (maybe that one is debatable), grounded person, as well as a good listener. As I’ve said in my first essay, I find people fascinating, and it is this fascination that allows me to interact with everyone in a way that I believe leaves them in a better mood than when we had just started talking. Leading others just comes naturally when I’m already able to communicate with them so effectively. The makings of one’s character require a great deal more than just being nice to people, however.

Read More
804 Words | 4 Pages

Leadership is a key part in Julius Caesar because without it, many of the significant events in the play would not have occurred. Caesar, Brutus, Cassius, and Antony all play the role of a leader in the middle of all the confusion in Rome, however, some characters are careless and would not be good leaders. It is often seen that great leaders have great qualities that allow them to lead well, but also are able to fight through obstacles, while there are some leaders who lack those qualities and lead poorly. A poor leader would be Caesar because he is hungry for more power and only thinks of himself and not of others.

Read More
762 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus has negatively affected the outlook of Rome and created more harm than good for the situation. Not only did it harm Rome, but it brought his own demise and hallucinations of Caesar’s ghost. Brutus’s speech to the plebeians after Caesar’s death, about his dilemma and his viewpoint towards Caesar, influenced the viewpoints of the plebeians and causes them to believe he is the best roman until Antony speaks to them. Brutus’s idealism led to his own death later on and brought him more misery than his idealism could

Read More
935 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus, According to Shakespeare The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, a Shakespearean play and representation of the assassination of Caesar, is a well written and developed story in which the build up of the characters is very well done. As a matter of fact, the developing of Brutus, the tragic hero on the play, is one of the most important characters and therefore one of the better explained and exposed. Brutus is a character that is marked with three traits that allow him to be the one responsible for Caesar's assassination. Indeed, Brutus is naive, well-intended and hypocrite, as seen when the conspirators convince him to be part of it, and be one of the most important figures in it.

Read More
350 Words | 2 Pages

He had the attitude of a fair ruler, one who cared for his people and would listen. He had an attitude unlike caesars. Caesars attitude was a you cant touch this attitude where he wouldnt listen to pesants while Brutus would have gone out of his wa to listen to even the littlest of people. I believe that Brutus would have been the leader that rome needed all along to help keep the country a whole. Brutus was the noblest man of all of rome because he was his own person and thought for others before he thought of himself.

Read More
824 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus claims were the opposite of Antony. Brutus claims was to convince the citizens that Caesar was a communist type of leader. Brutus says in his speech “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more”. He is claiming that Caesar was not good enough for Rome. Brutus makes another of the same claim, saying that Caesar is not enough for Rome saying, “with this I depart— that, as I slew my best lover for the good of Rome, I have the same dagger for myself, when it shall please my country to need my death”.

Read More

More about Brutus Aesar Qualities

Related Topics

Open Document