Brutus And Mark Anthony Speech
The Things They Carried, by Tim O’Brien, is a fictional collection of war stories that describe how knowing the difference between good and evil are changed through warfare and loss. The theme of morals is prevalent but it is displayed through losing previous morals Tim uses plain, candid storytelling to show that the societal conventions between right and wrong are lost through warfare also. Warfare modifies practically everybody who experience it. Making them lose sight of what is right or wrong. For instance, in Vietnam’s jungles and rice fields, while “humping” or moving along, they would “search the villages without knowing what to look for, not caring, kicking over jars of rice, frisking children and old men, blowing tunnels, sometimes
Following Caesar's death, a funeral is held at which both Brutus and Mark Antony speak. Each attempts to sway the crowd towards their own cause, and both are successful to some degree. However, Antony’s use of rhetorical strategies, figurative language, and tonal shifts allows him to incite enough outrage at the conspirators that Cassius and Brutus are forced to flee the city. The largest component in Antony’s ability to turn the people of Rome against the conspirators is his use of ethos, logos, and pathos.
Ambition Kills The trouble has just begun for Rome. The speeches of Mark Antony and Brutus are loaded with many lit devices, logos, ethos, pathos, and fallacies. These help the make very persuasive and appealing speeches. In a sense, the person who fails to win over the people by way of their speech will probably be killed.
After the Brutal murder of the "dictator" of Rome a formal burial in remembrance was made. The group of conspirators and a few others try and band together to make speeches to give at the ceremony. The conspirators all think that Mark Anthony is going to give a very controversial speech that is going to end in an all-out brawl to lead to anarchy. On the other hand, Brutus doesn't think that Mark Anthony is capable of such a thing so he only prepares a speech that is short, concise, and authoritative. He did not expect Anthony to pull out a huge well thought out speech that would lead to a blood bath.
Brutus and Antony’s speech really shows how important rhetoric is to present a good argument. During Act III, scene II of Julius Caesar, Rome is mourning the loss of Caesar after he is stabbed by the conspirators. Antony, Caesar’s best friend, joins the conspirators to seem like he is on their side. Antony’s final goal is to get revenge on them and start a civil war to avenge Caesar. He makes an agreement that he will not accuse or blame the conspirators in his speech at Caesar’s funeral.
The play by shakespeare called julius caesar was about the story of julius caesar. The story of Julius caesar was that he was stabbed to death by the whole senate. At one part in the play two people named Mark Antony and Brutus started to argue and try to persuade the people in some way by using different rhetorical techniques. Brutus used pathos to persuade the people that he chose right and he was still honorable and caesar deserved to die, but brutus mourned for his death just like the people. Antony used a logos and pathos technique to persuade the people that brutus was bad and that julius did nothing wrong, by using examples Antony made a valid point.
In William Shakespeare’s play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, two characters named Antony and Brutus gave speeches at Julius Caesar’s funeral. The two characters have been on opposite sides throughout the entire story. Antony was Caesar’s servant and would do anything for him. While Brutus was with the conspirators (the people who wanted to kill Caesar), but his reason to kill Caesar was just for the good of the people. Brutus offered to let Antony speak after him in the funeral, which led to Brutus being criticized and allowing the people to be persuaded by Antony.
At the end of the speech, Antony has won the citizens over and they feel that what Brutus and Cassius did was wrong and they want
Although Caesar, as the upcoming ruler of Rome in Julius Caesar, should be portrayed as the ideal leader of the play, he actually has too arrogant of a character to be so. Therefore, Shakespeare places honor in Brutus and allows Brutus to have the role of the idealistic leader of the story. Although Shakespeare writes this play in a controversial time period during England’s political turmoil, he allows the audience to be able to choose the true ruler of loyalty to the crown or the honor of a noble man through the understanding of the two contrasting character
In Act 3, Scene 2 of the tragedy of Julius Caesar written by Shakespeare, there are 2 very important speeches that shape the countrymen’s view on the death of Caesar. Marcus Brutus gives the first speech in an attempt to justify the murder he and his fellow conspirators just committed and the second speech is given by Mark Antony to open the citizen’s eyes to just how dishonorable and heinous the crime these men committed was. Both men use many rhetorical strategies in their speeches such as syntax to create juxtaposition and word choice to highlight the similarities and differences between the audience and the speaker in order to create an effect of either superiority or relatability to the audience. Each speech was effective in persuading the people to agree with a certain view, however in the end Mark Antony gave the speech that won the crowd.
Rhetoric in the Speeches of Brutus and Antony The death of Caesar is a controversial topic and was even more controversial at the time of his funeral when when senators were trying to benefit from his death by getting the Roman citizens on their side. At Caesar’s funeral, two senators gave speeches as an attempt to get the roman people on their side. Out of the two speeches, Marc Antony’s speech was more effective because of his use of appeals and biases, being 100% true and had a larger variety of rhetorical devices.
Brutus delivers his speech in a laudatory manner by conveying Caesar’s deeds and claiming he was ambitious, although Antony contradicts Brutus’ claims and says Caesar spurned the crown with the intent to merely rule as a de facto dictator. Brutus’ speech reveals his motives were truly for the benefit of Rome given his nationalistic tone and Antony’s speech was merely used to obscure his true motives, which was to embroil Rome in a series of civil wars to attain power. Brutus and Antony’s speeches consisted predominantly of Pathos and Ethos, but it is Antony who ultimately it is Antony who prevails because of his almost disingenuous attitude and even use of Logos which is seen when claims that reading Caesar’s will would dishonor his compeers and even Caesar
In the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar one of the main characters Caesar is killed in Scene 3 act 2.Then Brutus and Antony both give speeches about how bad they feel. Brutus gives a good speech by using all three of the rhetorical appeals to persuade the crowd to want to listen to what he say by using logos,ethos,pathos to his advantage. Brutus gives a better speech that draws the audience attention,Antony not as much. Therefor here are some very valid points on why Brutus’s speech used the Rhetorical Appeals better.
Brutus 's speech: Brutus speaks to the people of rome why he killed caesar so they will not turn on him. He talked about how he didnt kill him because he didn 't love him but because it was for the better of rome. He also tells the people of rome that letting caesar become king would mean the government type would change and all the wars and hard work his family had put into the government would go away. He also states, for the welfare of rome that he would die for rome if rome demands his death Rhetorical devices: Brutus used questions, logos, parallelism, and pathos to stir the people of rhome. Question-
Julius Caesar Speech Comparison Essay Brutus and Antony have prepared a speech about Julius Caesar is to convince the citizens of Rome to agree and be by their side. Brutus is the person talking about how it was good for their leader to die. While Antony talks about how it wasn’t good for Julius Caesar to die. It was not a very good idea to kill Caesar, Antony convinced many citizens of Rome. This is why Mark Antony gave a better speech than Brutus.
More about Brutus And Mark Anthony Speech
Societal Conventions In The Things They Carried, By Tim O Brien
539 Words | 3 PagesEthos And Figurative Language In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar
1173 Words | 5 PagesEthos Pathos Logos In Julius Caesar
638 Words | 3 PagesExamining Mark Anthony Of Brutus's Julius Caesar
534 Words | 3 PagesBrutus And Antony Rhetorical Devices
678 Words | 3 PagesPathos In Julius Caesar
663 Words | 3 PagesHow Does Antony Use Ethos In Julius Caesar
639 Words | 3 PagesEthos Pathos Logos In Julius Caesar
437 Words | 2 PagesHistorical Inaccuracies In Julius Caesar
1050 Words | 5 PagesExamples Of Juxtaposition In Julius Caesar
592 Words | 3 PagesRhetorical Devices Used In Brutus And Antony's Speech
721 Words | 3 PagesCompare And Contrast Brutus And Antony's Speech
884 Words | 4 PagesRhetorical Appeals In Brutus
755 Words | 4 PagesAnalyzing Brutus's Speech In 'Julius Caesar'
922 Words | 4 PagesCompare And Contrast Brutus And Antony Speech
824 Words | 4 Pages