Behind an action, there is intent. It is up to laws and our justice system to clearly pinpoint the level of intent behind an action. In both Billy Budd:An inside Narrative and Genesis - Cain and Abel - The First Murder, different levels of intent are demonstrated. In Billy Budd:An inside Narrative, the protagonist, Billy is accused of mutiny by, his companion, Claggart. It’s not understood why Claggart accused Billy of mutiny on the ship. However, that is not to say that there aren’t many compelling ideas of the relationship Billy and Claggart shared. Ultimately, Claggart’s accusation ends with Billy striking a fatal blow on Claggart’s head. It is essential to look at the leading context of Billy’s fatal blow, as his intent is unclear. Billy Budd, in many ways, is loved by those aboard on ship. He is often referred to as ‘baby’ or Jimmy Legs. It then is a surprise that Vere, the captain of the ship, orders the death penalty for Billy. Vere demonstrates his admiration,love,and respect for Billy as …show more content…
Cain and Abel both offer an offering to God, but only Abel’s offering is accepted. This feeling of contempt Cain feels is the prime motivator for Abel’s death. Although Cain’s actions are not specifically stated, the context after Abel’s death is evidence for his mal intent.“Am I my brother’s keeper?”(Line 9, Genesis - Cain and Abel - The First Murder) is a quote that resonates with his intent. This rhetoric response, to God’s questioning, implies that he is not responsible nor cares for his brother. The lack of remorse in Cain’s response, implies that he had intent to kill. It can then be implied that Cain was knowledgeable when taking action towards Abel. Cain was not negligible of his actions because he had clear knowledge and mal intent; he wanted to kill Abel. Under Penal Law 35.15, Cain would be charged with assault and second degree murder