ipl-logo

Business Law Case Summary

590 Words3 Pages

In order to protect their “Red Sole Mark”, Louboutin filed an application with the US patent and trademark in March, 2007. An approval of the trademark protection was given to Louboutin in 2008 for “lacquered red sole on footwear” having the color red as the main feature. In 2011, the famous fashion company of YSL decided to release monochromatic footwear using the colors yellow, green, purple and red. This segment included the same color for the whole shoe, including the heel, insole, upper and outsole. It’s worth mentioning that YSL has been designing this type of footwear since 1970’s.
When Louboutin learned that YSL was promoting and selling this type of footwear they ordered the withdrawal of the infringing shoes from the marketplace, shortly after that Louboutin and YSL entered into negotiations to prevent litigation. …show more content…

Under the federal law and the New York state law Louboutin was claiming trademark infringement and counterfeiting , trademark weakening and unfair competition, in addition unlawful deceptive acts under the New York state law, this was so because the red YSL shoe, which included a red sole greatly resembled the Louboutin “Red Sole Mark”.
Moreover Louboutin ordered a temporary injunction preventing YSL from promoting any type of monochrome shoes in order not to cause misperception among customers.
In response, YSL counterclaimed that the “Red Sole Mark” should be canceled because, it’s ornamental and it is functional. Furthermore, YSL also filed a complaint seeking damages for unfair competition and tortious interference with business

Show More
Related

Case Ten Associates V Mccutchen Fla

1265 Words | 6 Pages

The violation of statutory provisions by a landlord can qualify as a proximate cause for injuries to tenants in the case the surrounding environment was insecure and there was clear knowledge of intrusions into the given residential area. Ten Associates v. McCutchen Fla. App., 398 So.2d 860 (Fla.App. Ct. 1981). The landlord was legally obligated to positively respond to the plight of the tenants as their lease agreement put him responsible for any required repairs within the common area. The tenants, including Parker, had made numerous attempts to inform him of increased frequency of intrusion due to a broken deadbolt lock that he was mandated, according to the provisions of the statute, to promptly repair.

Read More

A Brief Summary Of A Civil Action

396 Words | 2 Pages

In the movie, A Civil Action, the plaintiff’s case began when a group of various parents and families believed that the health related issues and deaths in their city of Woburn was the result of contaminated water. Although the attorney, Jan Schlichtmann, was reluctant to take the case at first because they didn’t have plausible cause, he realized that 2 corporations sat at the border of the river. Mr. Schlichtmann and his firm thus took the case and file a major lawsuit which stated that the the two corporations, Grace and Beatrice, caused wrongful deaths due to the dumping of hazardous waste. The plaintiff side of this case then begins to collect scientific evidence and witness statements in order to prove that both Grace and Beatrice were

Read More

Business Law Case Study: Hi Mollie

168 Words | 1 Pages

Hi Mollie, The truckers started pulling out the X1 product yesterday. It looks like United Road bided out the work out to other carries to handle this movement. The trucking companies they are using are pulling VIN specific loads and are looking for exact locations. The two truckers I talked to yesterday, I told them the best I could do was tell them the general area to pick up the units and that they would have to find them.

Read More

Case Study: Vehar V. Cole National Group

991 Words | 4 Pages

Introduction This case study of Vehar v. Cole National Group is a case where the plaintiff, Wendy Vehar, accused Cole National Group of sex discrimination claiming that as a female she was not being the same wage as a male for performing the same duties. Additionally this study will determine if the plaintiff established a valid prima facie as well as if there was a basis for equal work. Next, what factors did the appeals court base its decision and why is the other-than-sex factor that is presented by the employer insufficient to avoid a trial? Finally, what should the employer have done differently to ensure this type of situation did not occur in their business?

Read More

Target Court Case Summary

666 Words | 3 Pages

Facts: Mrs. Moore entered into the Midwest City Target looking for a magnetic chess set and was informed that Target does not sell those. When Mrs. Moore was made aware of this information she started looking in the toy section. She picked up a telescope and the package was priced for around five or six dollars, so she purchased the telescope. Mr. Lanigan became aware of the situation and took the package from her car, led her inside, recited her rights, and accused her of switching price tags to make the item cheaper for her. One of Retail Shrinkage Control Employees also accused her of switching price tags.

Read More

Sun Company Vs Nlb Case Summary

1097 Words | 5 Pages

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) is the first stop in an unfair labor practice dispute between an employer and a union. What happens when the NLRB is wrong in their judgment, or one of the parties needs further clarification? The next stop would be an appeals court, and Baltimore Sun Company v. NLRB is an example of this conflict. Case Summary In 1996, the Baltimore Sun Company (Balt.

Read More

Holmes County Court Case Summary

418 Words | 2 Pages

MILLERSBURG — Two brothers serving a 14-month prison sentence were free men, for the most part, after Holmes County Common Pleas Judge Robert Rinfret granted both judicial release Wednesday. In December, Dennis Carl Bevington, 55, and Gary Lee Bevington, 62, both of 833 Depot St., pleaded guilty in Holmes County Common Pleas Court to failure to provide for a functionally impaired person. In exchange for their pleas, the more serious charges of involuntary manslaughter were dismissed. They could have faced 11 years in prison.

Read More

Newdow Supreme Court Case Summary

667 Words | 3 Pages

The case was implied a Magistrate Judge, whose brief discoveries and recommendation completed up, and "the Pledge does not slight the Establishment Clause. " The District Court grasped that proposition and released the protestation on July 21, 2000. The Court of Appeals turned around and issued three separate choices talking about the benefits and Newdow 's standing. As it would see it, the offers court consistently held that Newdow has remaining as a watchman to challenge a practice that meddles with his qualification to facilitate the religious direction of his daughter. That holding managed Newdow 's remaining to challenge not only the game plan of the school locale, where his young lady still is enrolled, moreover the 1954 Act of

Read More

Jordan Geller's The History Of Sneakers

623 Words | 3 Pages

One key point, there are new kinds of sneakers. New sneakers are more detailed and interesting; therefore, more people enjoy wearing them. In “The History of Sneakers”, in the fourth paragraph, the author states, “By 1900, A.G. Spalding had created the first high-top sneakers with pitted rubber soles for basketball.” One new type of sneakers was the first high-top sneakers, and it was made because of the rising popularity of sneakers. This new kind

Read More

Contract Law Case Summary

234 Words | 1 Pages

I do not believe there is a contract to convey real property between Wilbert Heikkila and David McLaughlin. McLaughlin agreed to buy three parcels of property for $145,000, $32,000 and $175,000. McLaughlin submitted his offer to Heikkila and earnest money checks. However after McLaughlin submitted the written offer to Heikkila, Heikkila changed the selling price of all three parcels, change the closing dates, and added a reservation.

Read More

Argumentative Essay On Air Jordan Sportswear

1338 Words | 6 Pages

The world famous basketball brand has had many controversies throughout its years. The huge controversy of the creation of the first sneaker and violence over Air

Read More

Criminal Justice Case Summary

725 Words | 3 Pages

1. Is the Court correct? Explain your reasoning The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reversed the lower courts approval of the drug checkpoint saying, “the checkpoint contravened the Fourth Amendment” (Cornell University Law School LII, 2000). The United States Supreme Court affirmed that decision stating that the, “checkpoint program was indistinguishable from a general interest crime control” (Cornell University Law School LII, 2000) that violated the Fourth Amendment.

Read More

Virgil Abloh Research Paper

868 Words | 4 Pages

For example, one of the shoes in the “Nike x Off-White ™ The Ten” (a collab that Off-White ™ has done)on the “Jordan One” he wrote “Air” in sharpie on the sole. This will be further discussed in the next paragraph. It was then, in 2013 that “Off-White ™ ” officially became an official brand. This was a brief summary of the history of Off-White

Read More

Air Jordan Informative Speech

466 Words | 2 Pages

Today, shoes are worn for comfort, design, color, and even lifespan of the shoe. I've always been a fan of collecting certain types of shoes just because of the design itself and the overall style as well and sometimes this is exactly what customers are looking for. They even have a custom shoe builder on almost all shoe companies you can think of. Nike is one of those companies and it's a great way to let

Read More

New Balance Case Study

1064 Words | 5 Pages

Starting as just a mail-order business with some retailers, it quickly opened new manufacturing facilities, starting with New England in the early 1980s as well as it signed contracts with other international distributors. While producing at lower costs outside the US, New Balance sold its shoes at a higher price than the average market and started to have huge sales anyways. Moreover, what makes New Balance’s operation strategy unique is that they offer their shoes in multiple widths and always have inventory in case the retailers get out of stock. This supports directly two of New Balance’s main competitive objectives being first that they want their customers to feel uniquely served by offering several widths of their shoes for different kind of feet and letting the customer not wait for the delivery of the shoes but always having inventory to push into the retail stores in case of scarcity. A good customer experience is one of their key competitive

Read More

More about Business Law Case Summary

Related Topics

Open Document