Caesar And Cleopatra Manipulation

Antony and Cleopatra can be described as… Throughout this prose, Antony is faced with the complexity of the persuasive influence and stature the conflicting characters of Octavius Caesar and Cleopatra present. In “Celebrating Idleness: Antony and Cleopatra and Play Theory”, Abigail Scherer maintains the idea that Caesar uses manipulation as a strategic tactic just as much as Cleopatra, explicating on the perception that Caesar exploits others politically to gain the advantage in his conquests. Although starkly different in technique, both Caesar and Cleopatra use their strength in prestige to incite dominance not only over Antony, but over anyone, in an attempt to gain authority. The contrast between Caesar and Cleopatra’s essence of manipulation can be identified as being politically or emotionally driven.

As a strategy to overcome his adversaries and broaden Rome’s provincial land, Caesar manufactures multiple arrangements such as marrying off his sister to strengthen alliances, generating catalysts towards future political gain. Caesar’s use of civic manipulation is imperially motivated, as he hopes to assimilate other territories’ cultures with Roman traditions. Caesar overcomes Antony, by forcing Antony’s traitorous soldiers to fight within the front line, and causing Antony internal dishonor. Caesar maintains his title, not by inheritance, but by defeating and manipulating his counterparts mentally.
Cleopatra can be compared to Caesar in her ability to manipulate her counterparts towards her gain, however, she is different in her ability to manipulate her own emotions and sensuality. Her inconsistent adoration and dramatic political prowess can be seen as she describes Antony’s love:
And when good will is show'd, though't