1. Facts: “Tennessee vs. Garner” - the decision of the Supreme Court of the USA in 1985 (471 US (1985), which deals with the application of the Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution . According to this decision, a police officer pursuing a suspect should not endanger life-saving escape, if the fugitive does not pose a threat to the life and health of others and / or the policeman himself. October 3, 1974 around 22:45 the officers police Memphis Lesli Rayt and Elton Haimon were on call on a burglary. Haimon walked around the house, while Wright maintained contact with the police station with the help of a walkie-talkie. Haimon noticed a man running through the courtyard of the house. It was Edward Garner. Haimon directed the light of his flashlight toward the fugitive, managed to see his face and hands and make sure that Garner was unarmed. According to police, they estimated the age of the suspect at 17-18. In fact, at the time of the events Eduard Garner was 15. After the request of Officer Haimon, Garner began to climb over the fence of the house. Haimon estimated the situation in such a way that if the fugitive manages to pass the fence, he will disappear, and he fired. The bullet hit the back of the head, and Edward Garner …show more content…
Garner (1985). Due to this decision, the police authorities changed their approaches and procedures for the use of firearms and increased the frequency of shooting. In some cases, the level of survivability of citizens after the use of weapons to them has increased due to the increased quality of medical care, treatment methods and time of care. Thirdly, police technologies have created new types of means, such as aerosols and teasers (electroshock devices), i.e. less lethal means. Fourth, the training of police officers in the use of verbal methods and decision-making has contributed to reducing the use of police