His areas of professional concentration include legal and medical malpractice, personal injury, corporate shareholder and partnership disputes, estate litigation, and matrimonial litigation. The private practice is particularly focused on cases involving
This consolidated appeal arises out of a declaratory judgment action, a foreclosure action, and a motion for possession of property initiated in the Circuit Court for Howard County. Mortgagor Sirina Sucklal (“Sucklal”), appellant, challenges the grant of summary judgment to the substitute trustees Mark H. Wittstadt, and Gerard Wm. Wittstadt, Jr. (collectively, “Substitute Trustees”), the ratification of the foreclosure sale, and the subsequent grant of a motion for judgment awarding possession to the purchasers at the foreclosure sale. On appeal, Sucklal presents six questions for our review, which we have condensed and rephrased as follows: 1.
Shadrack Babwiriza Case Brief Writing Assignment Martin. J Littlefield Criminal Law 10/27/15 Buffalo State College I. Dennys Rodrigues, Petitioner v. United States II. 135 S. Ct. 1609; 191 L. Ed. 2d 492 III.
. . be held and not be disbursed in any way, until we have reached an agreement on the total distribution to include Attorney fees, cost [sic] and expenses.” She stated that she was “requesting this action because of [her] overall dissatisfaction with the handling of [her] case from a legal standpoint.” Specifically, Wilson-Gaskins expressed that she was dissatisfied with: Kaye’s decision to file the claim in Montgomery County instead of “the more favorable jurisdiction of Prince George[’]s County”; delays in filing suit and with trial dates “as a result of [Kaye’s] needs”; the “failure to allege counts of retaliation and breach of contract” until beyond the statute of limitation, resulting in dismissal of those claims; and the failure to prove, to the satisfaction of the court, counts for discrimination and wrongful termination, resulting in dismissal on the discrimination count and the court’s denial of an award for punitive damages. Wilson-Gaskins asserted that, as a result of Kaye’s actions, she incurred “substantial financial loss,” and therefore, she requested a “substantial reduction in [his] attorney fees.” On June 17, 2009, Kaye sent Wilson-Gaskins a letter by facsimile regarding “Disbursement of Funds/Settlement of Claims.”
Krabappel is a new client of Mr. Simpson and not a long-standing one, it is necessary for their to be a clear establishment of rate of fee. After accepting Ms. Krabappel as a client, Mr. Simpson needed to explain to his client his general nature of the legal services to be provided, the basis, rate or total amount of the fee and whether and to what extent the client would be responsible for any costs. These details of the arrangement would be explained in writing in the form of a memorandum or pre-existing copy of the attorneys customary fee arrangements. These details of the arrangement must be communicated and understood between all involved Parties. As Mr. Simpson failed to communicate his fee arrangement with his client, he is in violation of Rule 1.5: Fees and begins his violations in terms of communication.
Pursuant to a notice of insufficiency filed by the District, the Hearing Officer concluded that the complaint was insufficient and grating Petitioner Leave to Amend. On May 20, 2015, the Petitioner filed an amended complaint to which the District filed objections and a plea to the jurisdiction. Through a June 15, 2015 Order the Hearing Officer dismissed the Beaumont III, finding the issues pled sought to enforce the Hearing Officers Decision in Beaumont
Plaintiff is an inmate in the custody of the Nevada Department of Corrections (NDOC), and at all times relevant to the Amended Complaint, Plaintiff was incarcerated at High Desert State Prison (HDSP). On February 27, 2014, Plaintiff was brought before the Full Classification Committee, in which it was determined he was suitable for housing in general population. Am. Compl.
I, William Weller, in consideration of my receipt of the sum of $5,800.00 paid to me by Joshua A. Halpern, M.D., P.A., a Florida corporation (“Halpern”), in the form of a credit to my American Express Card No. _________________________, have duly executed this Release Agreement (this “Agreement”) voluntarily and without any constraints. I hereby remise, release, acquit, satisfy and forever discharge Halpern and its employees, owners, contractors, directors, officers, agents, and representatives (collectively, the “Halpern Parties”), from any and all any and all claims, actions, causes of action, damages, and demands whatsoever, in law or in equity, which I had, now have, or may have against any of the Halpern Parties that are in any way related
In the present case, the relationship purportedly forming the basis for the constructive fraud claim was formed in a professional setting and is much more akin to the relationship in Crumley and Cobb, rather than Terry, Link, or Vail. The Amended Claims allege the Hospital CEO “and Dr. Stout had a relationship of trust and confidence, due to [the Hospital CEO’s] role as CEO and hospital administrator with responsibilities to physicians and their patients.” In such situations, the Courts are reluctant to find the existence of a fiduciary duty or relationship necessary to support a constructive fraud cause of action, and should not be found to exist here.
We have a home equity loan that was reviewed as part of the SAFE act audit with a missing note. We have a credit application and the mortgage; however, we can’t locate the note in Mortgage Flex. Besides not being able to foreclose on the property in an event of a delinquency is there any violations in regulations that we need to be
The organization I picked for my Interview paper was the First Capital Federal Credit Union. The credit union is a non-profit organization, in the public sector. The credit union solely operates on the benefits of its members. The credit union was originally established as the S. Morgan Smith Credit Union, and later became known as Allis Chalmers Credit Union when the company was acquired by the S. Morgan Smith Company on April 1, 1959.
Request Exercise The group I observed for this exercise was myself, my husband (Andy), our roommate (Jester), my parents in law (Lea and Waldo) and their roommate (Debt Collector). We were staying for dinner at my in laws house in Phoenix. Andy is wonderful and non-confrontational, he is 29. Jester is an idiot with whom I live, he almost 40.
In contrast, the issue of competency on behalf of an incompetent individual is settled in by a Substituted
I am writing in support of Dalton Mott’s application for a clerkship in your chambers. I have gotten to know Mr. Mott during the past two years, and I have been impressed by Mr. Mott’s dedication and intellect. I got to know Mr. Mott as a student in my first-year Civil Procedure course, where I was Mr. Mott’s small section professor. Overtime, I was able to learn about Mr. Mott’s legal work and abilities, and I am confident he will make a great law clerk and attorney.
Case Study 1: Banc One Corporation Asset and Liability Management Gizem Akkan So basically, the main problem Banc One Corporation has falling share prices as it is written from a 48 ¾ to 36 ¾ in April 1993. The basic reason behind this decline is that its exposure to derivative securities. This decline in share prices raises concerns among the Banc One’s Investors as well as its analysts since they are uncomfortable with huge amount of derivative usage particularly swaps. They think they are not able to measure risks they exposed so this create uncertainity about the firm’s financial stability.
