ipl-logo

Case Study: Miller V. Alabama

1663 Words7 Pages

Kyra Rubin
Professor Jennifer Larson
English 105i
5 October 2015

Unit 2, Feeder 1

In the 2013 case of Miller v. Alabama, the Supreme Court held that a mandatory minimum sentence of life-without-parole is an unconstitutionally disproportionate punishment for a juvenile. Under the Eighth Amendment protections from cruel and unusual punishment, the Court held that mitigating factors must be considered in determining sentencing for juveniles. The issue in Montgomery v. Louisiana is concerned with whether or not this rule can be applied retroactively; doing so would potentially provide relief for the inmates who are currently serving time after being sentenced to live-without-parole as juveniles, and who didn’t have such mitigating factors considered.
Issue: Does the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. Alabama, which held that the Eighth Amendment prohibits mandatory sentencing schemes that require children convicted of homicide to be sentenced to life in prison without parole, apply retroactively?
Thesis: In this paper, I will argue that the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. Alabama does in fact apply retroactively.

1. Research Question 1: Does the retroactive application of Miller v. Alabama undermine the value of finality in criminal sentencing as discussed in Mackay v. United States?
MLA Works cited entry for source that addresses Research Question 1: Mackay v. United States The decision of Mackay v. United States argues against legal retroactive review by claiming that this process undermines the finality of criminal sentencing, thus threatening the efficacy, accuracy, and legitimacy of the criminal sentencing process. Justice Harlan, (who wrote this majority decision), bases these major concerns on the …show more content…

Research Question 2: How is the fairness of granting the benefits of Miller v. Alabama in future cases, while denying retroactive application, impacted by political eras and racial, economic, and home-life quality disparities of sentenced

Show More
Related

Case Study Of Evan Miller V. Cole Cannon

462 Words | 2 Pages

The punishment is just. Rights belive to be violated 8th amendment 14th amendment Rules: “567 U.S. ___ (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that mandatory sentences of life without the possibility of parole are unconstitutional for juvenile offenders.[2][3] The ruling extended beyond the Graham v. Florida (2010) case, which had ruled juvenile life without parole sentences unconstitutional for crimes excluding murder”. Analysis: Both sides are in disagreement over whether or not the sentence violates the defendant 8th amendment.

Read More

Miller Vs Alabama Research Paper

1229 Words | 5 Pages

Miller V. Alabama The Facts One July 2003 night, Evan Miller a 14-year-old juvenile at the time; was together with a friend Colby Smith at Miller’s house (Oyez,n.d.). At the time, Miller was expecting a neighbor Cole Cannon to come by to ascertain a drug deal with Miller’s mother (Miller V. Alabama, 2012,p.1004).Miller and Smith then preceded to Cannon ’s trailer to smoke marijuana while playing drinking games (Miller V. Alabama, 2012,p.676, 689). Once Cannon lost consciousness, Miller took the opportunity to steal Cannon’s wallet; successful, he shared the $300 he obtained with Smith (Miller V. Alabama, 2012,p.676,689). Then Miller tried to cover his tracks by replacing Cannon’s wallet (now empty) back into his pocket; while doing so Cannon regained consciousness and seized Miller at the neck and throat (Miller V. Alabama, 2012,p.676,689).

Read More

Segal And Spaeth's Argument Analysis

1314 Words | 6 Pages

In regards to the detailed studies of both Segal and Spaeth, and Brenan and Stier, valid points had been made for both sides of the argument. The question posed is rather or not stare decisis still exist in the courts rulings today. Segal and Spaeth analyze the rulings of dissenting judges of landmark cases since the start of the Warren Court while excluding cases with unanimous decisions and cases without progeny within the legal period. The areas of which they dissected and constructed the particular datasets for analyzing is superb as it specifically narrows down the specific information there looking for within their results. The findings from there assessments concluded that precedent did not play a overwhelming role in the sub sequential

Read More

Summary Of Gideon's Trumpet By Anthony Lewis

819 Words | 4 Pages

The written story of how Clarence Earl Gideon, a poor Florida man, went from a convicted criminal to ultimately redefining legal history is astounding. The Supreme Court commonly dismisses more cases than it accepts and the fact that a handwritten petition from a prison inmate was accepted shows that even the seemingly most insignificant person can make a difference in our society. The book’s literature is highly legalistic but constantly provides a detailed account of how the judicial system is constructed. Coming from a regular college student standpoint with no previous formal law education, this makes the underlying concept easier to grasp. The story’s setting during the time of the Gideon case, showed how the legal system was constructed towards the growing concept of a defendant’s rights.

Read More

What Are The Results Of The Evan Miller Court Case

1404 Words | 6 Pages

Alabama are still in debate. The Supreme Court still hasn’t decided whether or not the ruling would apply to past cases. But the decisions one makes at the age of 14 aren’t the same as 24, 34, or 44 and for that matter they deserve the opportunity of parole after a fair sentence. It does give the current youth an opportunity to parole or not to be sentenced to life without parole. Miller vs. Alabama was, “the third in a decade that puts new constitutional limits on crimes involving juveniles” (Savage) being one of the biggest rulings in recent court.

Read More

Montgomery's Trial: The Miller V. Louisiana Case

375 Words | 2 Pages

In a new 2012 case, Miller v. Alabama, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that mandatory sentencing of minors convicted of homicide to

Read More

What Was The Legal Significance Of The Case Of Gerald Gault

878 Words | 4 Pages

In the 1970’s Gault’s case set precedent for two more cases, the cases of Mckeiver v. Pennsylvania, In Re: Burris. Also, the case of Goss v. Lopez. Both cases happen within four years. The case of Gault made the evaluation of the due process much more

Read More

Critical Evaluation Of Bordenkircher Vs. Hayes

1600 Words | 7 Pages

Criminal Penalties Spring 2016 Final Critical Evaluation of Bordenkircher v. Hayes By: 1518 In Bordenkircher v. Hayes, a case that challenged the ability of prosecutors to threaten a defendant with additional and more severe charges if he refused to plead guilty, the Supreme Court held that there is no violation of the Due Process Clause when the defendant is re-indicted on more serious charges for which he is plainly subject to prosecution. The defendant in Bordenkircher, Mr. Hayes, had been charged with uttering a forged instrument in the amount of $88.30. If Mr. Hayes agreed to plead guilty the prosecutor agreed to recommend a five-year prison sentence and to forego charging Mr. Hayes under the Kentucky Habitual Criminal Act (“HCA”).

Read More

Shelby County V. Holder Case Analysis

1234 Words | 5 Pages

Shelby County V. Holder: A critical analysis Introduction Along the time human beings have been able to evolve and modify its surroundings despite the environmental challenges. As a result, society has been creating laws in order to regulate different aspects of life. Shelby County V. Holder has a variety of components that made this case relevant.

Read More

Summary Of Antonin Scalia's Adoption Of The Constitution

688 Words | 3 Pages

The articles written by Antonin Scalia and Stephen Breyer both contribute valid insight on how the Constitution should be interpreted. They, however, end up taking conflicting views on whether to adopt what is known as a living constitution or to bind the judiciary by the original meaning of the document. Throughout their works, the authors mention the importance of objectivity, judicial restraint and the historical context in which the Constitution was written under and whether or not it should apply to the United States today. Scalia argues in favor of the originalist approach, stating that he supports neither a strict nor a loose interpretation of the Constitution, but rather, a reasonable interpretation. Breyer sides with the cosequentialist ideals, claiming that active participation in collective power is paramount when it comes to evaluating the Constitution's place in American law.

Read More

Judicial System In The Hollow Hope By Gerald R. Rosenberg

520 Words | 3 Pages

Rosenberg puts forth two views of how the Supreme Court's achieves the effects it does: the "Dynamic Court" and the "Constrained Court". The Dynamic Court view maintains that the United States Supreme Court is indeed capable of effecting widespread change. The Constrained Court view holds that unless certain constraints and conditions imposed upon the Court by the Constitution, the Congress, the public, and other factors are overcome, the Court is unable to accomplish significant change. Rosenberg supports his claims by analyzing specific court decisions, namely Brown v. Board of Education (1954) and Roe v. Wade (1973). Rosenberg condenses three constraints he sees on judicial efficacy that are built into the American legal system: the limited nature of constitutional rights, the lack of judicial independence, and the judiciary’s limited enforcement powers (Rosenberg 2008, pg.

Read More

The Controversy: The Dred Scott Case Of 1857

643 Words | 3 Pages

When one holds a prestigious position on the United States Supreme Court, they possess the opportunity to alternate the future of the country. However, that impulse should not be entertained in the majority of instances, as with the Dred Scott Case of 1857. Although that conflict should have dissolved after the subject dissolved, Chief Justice Roger Taney allegedly overextended his reach to determine the legality of another issue that had troubled the United States. In addition, the decision decided on the case itself negates the framework of the U.S. Constitution by infringing on an individual’s rights, regardless of who they might be. At the time of the Dred Scott Decision, the United States had become deadlocked over the controversy

Read More

Summary Of The Powell V. Alabama Case

1432 Words | 6 Pages

Powell v. Alabama is a landmark case that addressed the right to counsel for defendants in criminal cases. The case came from the conviction of nine African American kids who were accused of sexually assaulting two white women on a train in Alabama in 1931. The nine kids were tried and convicted in a rushed trial that barley lasted a few hours, in which they were not provided with a legal counsel and were subject to intimidation and threats from the prosecution and the people outside the courthouse. The case raised important questions about the rights of criminal defendants to due process, legal counsel, and equal protection under the law. The ruling in the Powell v. Alabama case established the principle that even criminals are

Read More

Restricting Abortion In Sandra O Connor's Cases

1250 Words | 5 Pages

“Because of the evolving nature of constitutional law, the potential ramifications of O’Connor’s opinion were great. Federal judges in habeas cases were often in the position to rule on questions for which there was not yet a directly controlling Supreme Court precedent (Bikupic, 2005). Shortly after the Teague case Justice O’Connor had to vote in another habeas case Penny v. Lynaugh in this case O’Connor submitted the deciding vote and also wrote the opinion that seemed to disembowel

Read More

Low Voter Turnout In America

504 Words | 3 Pages

The U.S. legal system has numerous pros and cons discovered throughout history and the ambiguous system is a glorious quality. The American public has the right to decided whether the legal system’s benefits outweigh the

Read More

More about Case Study: Miller V. Alabama

Related Topics

Open Document