Case Study Paul The Temporary Employee At Energy Rodeo

) Paul the temporary employee at Energy Rodeo might pursue for racial discrimination under the Civil Rights act of 1964 which outlaws all employment based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. It applies to hiring, pay, work conditions, promotions discipline, and in this case discharges. Paul can claim that he feels intimidated by a supervisor’s constant disrespectful comments and racist remarks written in the bathroom about Hispanics because Paul is Hispanic. He can say that he does not feel safe in that work environment. Paul also did something about it and brought up the matter to his supervisor who did not take him seriously and joked around with him about the situation even though Paul was being serious. Title VII covers

The issue that this deal between Frisco and Barteca is violating is the trade restraint covenant called not to compete. A clause in employment or business sales contracts that restricts competition by one of the parties; must be reasonable in scope and time. It is necessary to preserve competition. A buyer purchasing a business from an existing business owner means that someone new is starting in the market. In this case Del Frisco Restaurant Group are planning to buyout Barteca Restaurant, so they can expand their business all over Las Vegas since most of the locations Barteca owns are in Vegas and in California. Meanwhile Frisco already has a lot of business in Vegas so getting this offer would give them lot more monopolization in Vegas. Frisco main issue would be in Vegas because they would be taking customers and putting new buyers out of business, heading them to dominate the markets by a sell and destroy plan. Monopolization is the possession of monopoly power in the relevant market by willful acquisition. Sherman Act is a Commerce clause and is the first federal antitrust law that prohibits monopolization ang horizontal trade restraints such as price fixing boycotts, and refusal to deal. If Bartica accepts the offer Frisco would be adding more locations to their business adding more restaurants to their 35 upscale locations meaning most of the restaurants in Vegas would be owned by Frisco. This offer gives them an advantage because Las Vegas is a very popular place that will benefit Frisco and its business giving them more monopolization in the market boosting their market share. The Sherman Act does not prohibit market power or even all monopolies. So even if they do merge they might not be such a threat to the market because they are not as well known as other companies/restaurants. The offer between Frisco and Barteca