ipl-logo

Flatworldknowledge Essay

693 Words3 Pages

Review the material in Chapter 7 in the FlatWorldKnowledge text. Then, go to the discussion forum for Unit 3 and engage in a dialogue with your classmates by answering the following questions:

Why do you think a society would address liability for civil wrongs separately from criminal wrongs? Should a wrongdoer be potentially liable both for, civil wrongs as well as for criminal wrongs related to the same wrongdoing?
• A civil wrong would be addressed separately from the crime wrong because crime involves society commendation and should be punished by the state while civil wrong is doing something wrong against a person thus resulting in compensation for the wronged person. However, wrong doers can liable for both civil and criminal wrong …show more content…

Sometimes people excuse the damage they cause by saying this was a mistake or that they did not mean to cause the damage. Is this a valid excuse to avoid liability for damage caused? Explain your answer.
• This is not a valid excuse to avoid liability the reason being that negligence or been carelessness should not be an excuse for an individual receiving damaged or being injured. All individuals are required to behave and act responsibly and reasonably. This entails exercising care in handling or interacting with others. The plaintiff has the right to demonstrate legally recognizable past, present and future economic, pain and suffering caused by the injuries. The defendant equally has the right to raise several rightful defences to …show more content…

A classic example of strict liability is the owner of a lion zoo or game park, It doesn’t matter how strong the cages where lions live are, if one of the lions escapes and causes damage and injury or even death, the owner is held liable. Extending strict liability to everyday products has provided product liability law in which manufacturers, distributors, suppliers, retailers, and others who make these products available to the public are held responsible for the injuries those products cause. Thus, if the product is defective and cause harm to others, the manufacturer is liable for that, even if the manufacturer was not negligent in making the product defective. This is same with warranties every product purchased comes with warrant hence you have to keep docket so that if you find anything wrong with the product you bought, you can return it and be refunded of compensated. ”Warranties are statements by a manufacturer or seller concerning a product during a commercial transaction,” (FindLaw,

Show More
Related
838 Words | 4 Pages

“The defendant is liable only if the product is defective when it leaves his hands. There must be something wrong with the goods. If they are reasonably safe and the buyer’s mishandling of the goods causes the harm, there is no

Read More
1253 Words | 6 Pages

In the case of Tomcik vs. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Janet Tomcik, the plaintiff, blamed the loss of her right breast on the fact that there was a major delay in her examination and treatment of her tumor. This could be known as nonfeasance negligence, which is the “failure to act when there is a duty to act,” (Pozgar, 2016). The corrections department, or in this case, the defendant, claimed that Tomcik`s cancer was already so developed, that her breast would have been removed regardless of when her official checkup and treatment took place. One stakeholder in this case is Janet Tomcik. She is the patient who not only lost her breast, but endured “physical pain, [and] emotional suffering,” (Tomcik, 1991).

Read More
452 Words | 2 Pages

Also, she will testify that practice for the year had commenced in June 2011 and the team practiced approximately 3-4 times per week. She will testify on the day of the plaintiff’s injury she was properly supervising practice and that she was only four to five feet away from the group when the injury

Read More
1403 Words | 6 Pages

Strict liability strikes a good balance between the regulatory offences and the principle that the morally blameworthy may be punished by having to prove that the prohibited act was done beyond a reasonable doubt. Negligence is presumed, unless the defence establishes a defence of

Read More
437 Words | 2 Pages

In order to maintain a claim regarding medical malpractice, a plaintiff must show 1) a duty owed to the plaintiff by the defendant (inherent, voluntary, or statutory) 2) a breach of the duty by allowing the conduct to fall below the standard of care, and 3) a compensable injury proximately caused by the defendant’s breach of duty. Carey was able to establish an inherent duty was owed to him by Connelly but was not able to provide evidence to support his claim about the breach of duty by conduct or that his injury was caused solely by the conduct of

Read More
221 Words | 1 Pages

The 2011 federal district court opinion from the Middle District of Pennsylvania addressed a general public misconception regarding the Rule of Evidence 701. Indeed, Eric Lyons attempted to use his x-ray results and his physical symptoms against the defendants even though he lacked the expertise to prove that his broken rib injury resulted from his fight against Anthony Boyking. Furthermore, Lyons also believed that his contender benefited of the defendants’ involvement to defeat him. Certainly, Eric Lyons may have been accurate about his rights under the Eight Amendment, however, the law could not take into consideration his testimony due to the fact that his deposition would not qualify as a subject matter expert in the medical field. Thus, the pretrial order the defendants pursued to prevent the plaintiff 's personal contribution regarding his physical symptoms is legit regardless the truthfulness of Eric Lyons’s statement.

Read More
669 Words | 3 Pages

Part 4: Source and Summary • My search on Westlaw led me to 24 Mich. Civ. Jur. Torts § 7.

Read More
639 Words | 3 Pages

It It f It frustrates me what Dr. Anna Pou had to go through with the lawsuits of the Memorial Medical Center incident. As Healthcare professionals, being sued for making the rightful decision for the patient and the hospital is unjust. Healthcare professionals like Dr. Pou, have taken the Hippocratic oath, and one of the promises made within that oath is “first, do no harm”. Hospital’s should not be so quick to make such an important decision of pressing charges to their faculty; more trust should be placed in them. In addition, she made it clear her intentions were just to ‘‘help’’ patients ‘‘through their pain,’’ on national television.

Read More
1282 Words | 6 Pages

When the plaintiff’s

Read More
1368 Words | 6 Pages

Health Care Law: Tort Case Study Carolann Stanek University of Mary   Health Care Law: Tort Case Study A sample case study reviewed substandard care that was delivered to Ms. Gardner after having sustained an accident and brought to Bay Hospital for treatment. Dr. Dick, a second-year pediatric resident, was on that day in the ED and provided care for Ms. Gadner. Dr. Moon, is the chief of staff and oversees the credentialing of all physicians at Bay Hospital.

Read More
187 Words | 1 Pages

Applying the chapter ‘The Relational Perspective’ to Andy and April’s relationship is a great way to show that unknowingly, even writers of a series can create a complex relationship. Both characters participate in commutative actions that are mirrored in real life by real couples. With all of this, the episode “Andy and April’s Fancy Party” (3x9) shows how truly in love this couple is. Andy and April make this clear to all by exchanging vows they each wrote in front of their loved ones. April starts with “I guess I kind of hate most things, but I never really seem to hate you.”

Read More
1019 Words | 5 Pages

We take forward that obligation to insure that others are treated

Read More
1414 Words | 6 Pages

“Medical malpractice claims and lawsuits deal with Improper, unskilled, or negligent treatment of a patient by a physician, dentist, nurse, pharmacist, or other health care professional. Negligence is the predominant theory of liability concerning allegations of medical malpractice, making this type of litigation part of Tort Law. Since the 1970s, medical malpractice has been a controversial social issue. Physicians have complained about the large number of malpractice suits and have urged legal reforms to curb large damage awards, whereas tort attorneys have argued that negligence suits are an effective way of compensating victims of negligence and of policing the medical profession. A person who alleges negligent medical malpractice

Read More
1997 Words | 8 Pages

The area of tort in law is also called negligence it is caused due to carelessness... In Legal position the idea of negligence should exercise reasonable when they act by taking account f that they might foreseeable cause harm to other

Read More
1153 Words | 5 Pages

The law of tort applies duties of the civil law in respect to a wide range of behavior which are relevant to a business activity, this area of law serves a very important role for consumers and those are doing business with them. As stated above in order to have a sure fire claim when claiming under the tort of negligence it is compulsory to fulfill the three requirement, the first requirement is the " duty of care " it is stated that whether the defendant owes the plaintiff a duty of care, is definitely a question of the law. it is always onus that the plaintiff establish the existence of a duty of care, but usually in most cases it is very straightforward to establish a duty of care, as long as it is provided that the relationship between parties falls within the duty of care for example a doctors owes a duty of care to his/her patients, or motorist owe a duty of care to the other road users, even architects owe a duty of care to the people who are occupying the specific building, these are just few examples of owing a duty of care. if the relationship between the parties does not fall within the established duties of care, than the plaintiff needs to be able to show the 2 things which are (1) '' it was reasonably foreseeable that the defendant act or omission could cause harm to someone in the plaintiff's position ", which means that it the plaintiff must be able to show that during the time of the incident it was reasonably foreseeable that the defendant's code of conduct could cause harm to someone in the plaintiff's position.

Read More

More about Flatworldknowledge Essay

Related Topics

Open Document