Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact from the stonewall riots
The impact from the stonewall riots
Homophobia as a prejudice
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The killing cousins also known as David Alan Gore and Fred Waterfield were convicted of murdering multiple women after raping them. David Gore was the most recognized of the two because he was sentenced to the death penalty. Gore, killed four teenage girls and two women and Lynn Elliott is what brought about his capital punishment. On July 26, 1983, Gore and his cousin Fred Waterfield picked up Lynn Elliott and her 14 year old fried hitchhiking to Wabasso Beach north of Vero Beach. They were taken at gunpoint to Gore’s parents’ house where Waterfield and Gore raped them.
In the “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” by Martin Luther King Jr., he writes a letter in which he is expressing his concerns about having morals and justice. On the other hand, the article “What’s Wrong with Equal Right for Women” by Phyllis Schlafly, her main focus was to campaign against the endorsement of the Equal Rights Amendment to the United States Constitution. In both the letter and the article, Martin Luther King Jr and Phyllis Schlafly are both very strong activist with different opinions. In the letter that Martin Luther King Jr wrote from Birmingham City Jail was to write to a group of clergy members who did not approve of his actions in Birmingham City.
In 1849, Henry David Thoreau’s essay, Resistance to Civil Government was published. In this essay, Thoreau discussed the importance of using civil disobedience in hopes of creating a more civilized government. Around 100 years later, Martin Luther King Jr. wrote a letter to some clergymen about why blacks should have the same civil rights just like everyone else called, Letter from Birmingham Jail. King was greatly influenced by Thoreau and many of King’s ideas were acquired from principles used in Thoreau’s essay. Compare and contrast how these two men were similar and different when it came to their beliefs of civil disobedience.
In his “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, Martin Luther King, Jr. is responding to criticism of the peaceful protests and sit-in’s that were taking place in Birmingham, which led to his being arrested and the reason that he was in jail. He first responds to the accusation of being an “outsider” by setting the stage for his being in Birmingham due to being invited because of his ties to the Alabama Christian Movement for Human Rights organization and due to the fact that he is president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. Next, Martin Luther King expands on his moral beliefs that there is “injustice” in the way that Birmingham is “the most thoroughly segregated city in the United States”.
They raided the bar under the pretense that the Stonewall was serving alcohol without a liquor license. Raids on gay bars were common in the early 1900s. According to the Stonewall Inn’s website “During a typical raid... the customers were lined up and their identification checked. Those without identification or dressed in full drag were arrested.” The raid on the Stonewall Inn happened in this fashion.
“A group of people decided they’d had enough. They took a stand and in doing so began the New York Gay Activist movement. Which eventually spread to other parts of the country…. I very much doubt they know the impact of their decision to stand firm that day in 1969, but it’s because of those people that gay rights exist in this country today,” Lynley Wayne, LGBT Writer. Everyday people are trying to stand up for themselves.
Although a century apart, Martin Luther King Jr’s Letter from Birmingham Jail and Frederick Douglass’s What to a Slave is the fourth of July are kindred spirits. Notwithstanding the many differences in their respective writing styles, deep down the essence of the message conveyed is still very much the same. Both Martin Luther King Junior and Frederick Douglas had similar beliefs and concepts related to the treatment of the African American community. They both describe a tough yet heart breaking situation that makes them question their moral values and doubt the system and its ability to change for better.
Though it is the dream of most, few men have risen from the lines of poverty to the utmost remembered general of Virginia history. Many Americans know this general as being a humble man, “The louder people cheered, the more embarrassed he became” (Robertson 9). This man was General Thomas Johnathan Jackson, whose nickname “Stonewall” remains the most famous in Virginia history. Nevertheless, what a majority of people do not know is Jackson’s struggled rise to power and the “Gentleman of Manners” (Roberson 11) who placed his main studies on becoming a better person through a book of maxims. Growing up with his an uncle consumed with greed, Jackson partook in few opportunities of education and learning the prosperities of love.
Throughout history there have been many situations where people’s rights have been taken for granted and many brave faces that has risen to the occasion to support the rights of others. Some of these brave people were Martin Luther King and Franklin D. Roosevelt. These two men are known for advertising the rights of others. They stood up for what they believed in, which was freedom and equal rights for all Americans. In both the Letter from a Birmingham Jail and The Four Freedom’s speech they both discussed why everyone should have equal rights, they both used religion to back up their claim, and they both discussed basic human rights that all people should have.
Literary Analysis Kelsey Ganzon Ela ⅘ Cormy Civil rights: The rights of citizens to political and social freedom and equality. This is something everyone should be guaranteed to have. Today we are all equal, but it always wasn’t like that. Martin Luther King Jr. changed society forever.
The civil rights movement was a way for black people to combat that attitude. John included it in his story to support his newfound respect and empathy for the black race, as the newly demanded respect for them was
It explains how four hundred years of history still affect society to this day. It talks about uncomfortable truths or the truths society ignores and draws from history. Before and during the Civil Rights Movement, many were denied basic rights and were poorly treated. Racial conflict, the suppression of people of color, and white supremacy are shown. When a group is oppressed and dehumanized, it is easier to not care or think about it.
The authors use of words such as “dark clouds of racial prejudice” and “I cannot sit idly by” shows the injustice that was occurring in Birmingham. The “dark clouds” represent the social climate of Birmingham, allowing readers to see the negative effect it his having on the black citizens. He believed the injustice needed to be addressed and action needed to be taken against it, therefore what he did was justified. Additionally when Martin Luther King writes, “nagging signs reading ‘white’ men and colored when your first name becomes ‘nigger’ and your wife and mother are never given the respected title of Mrs…” This further demonstrates the unjust treatment of African Americans which is why someone needed to take action and not idly sit by as these things occcurred.
THE STONEWALL RIOTS The Stonewall riots are widely believed to be the single most important event leading to the gay liberation movement and the modern fight for LGBT rights in the United States. Considered by some to be the "Rosa Parks" moment of the gay rights movement in America, the riots were a series of spontaneous, violent demonstrations against a police raid of the Stonewall Inn in Greenwich Village, New York, in the early hours of June 28th, 1969. This single event has left a resounding impact on the fight for LGBT rights that can still be seen today. Throughout the 50s and 60s in the United States, the FBI along with local police departments kept close watch on what they believed to be "homosexual activity".
Gus Van Sant, the director of the movie, chose to include every detail that he possibly could to relate this movie to American Democracy. He strategically included heterosexual and homosexual actors to spark a political debate. The director clearly wanted to make a point about the discrmination against the LGBTQ society. He emphasizes this by having homosexuals march down the streets of San Francisco, destroying city property.