ipl-logo

Civil Obedience As Depicted In Plato's Dialogue 'Crito'

830 Words4 Pages

In 300 BCE, in Plato’s dialogue “Crito,” which is a conversation between Socrates and Crito, claims that laws should be followed and obeyed. Plato does not use any evidence to back up his claim because the dialogue is more like a monologue. Howard Zinn on the other hand has a completely different view. Zinn gives a speech in 1970, stating that laws should not be obeyed. He states that any society that follows laws will have no justice or leads into a greater amount of chaos. In his speech, “The Problem is Civil Obedience” he selects historic and current examples. For example he uses the Vietnam War, rights and slavery to support his claim. About 100 years later in 1849, Thoreau writes a speech also using an unjust war. Within his essay “Civil …show more content…

Zinn disagrees with this concern because he believes the opposite of the concern. His position is that there needs to be civil disobedience because the electoral system is not functional and the majority always wins. Zinn states, “-about the voting process, you find that the voting process is a sham.” in reality the people are voting but they are not voting for who is morally right. They end up voting for the popular one. Also in voting the majority always wins and minority always suffers. The civil disobedience allows the minority to stand up for what they believe in and continue to have a conscience. Thoreau’s position is similar to Zinn’s in agreeing that there is a need of civil disobedience but he adds on that the majorities vote is not always right and is not a good guideline between right and wrong. “Must the Citizen ever for a moment, or in the least degree, resign his conscience to the legislator? Why has everyman a conscience, then?” He is implying that men have a conscience for a reason. Man should use his conscience and decide for himself and not rely on the majority because they could be wrong. Spitz also agrees with Zinn and Thoreau that civil disobedience is necessary. His position is “… Under such circumstances, it may well be that obedience to democracy can best, and perhaps only, be served by disobedience to some laws.” In other words he is

Show More
Related
876 Words | 4 Pages

The laws are suppose to protect the society and its people, yet when the order of the government turns corrupt, then the validity of everything is at stake. As one can see, the corrupt laws placed Socrates in prison and he chose to abide by the impartial laws in order to be consistent and loyal to the

Read More
486 Words | 2 Pages

Thoreau starts his essay by condemning his fellow countrymen’s actions, or rather, inaction. They and Thoreau share similar moral beliefs, but they refuse to take any action towards them. “Must the citizen ever for a moment, or

Read More
943 Words | 4 Pages

In Chapter 17 of Grapes of Wrath, families began to move into a community with other families and learned the “rules” of that society. Under these rules, the families have the “right to talk and to listen” (Steinbeck 265). In this way, Steinbeck believes that people should use this right to form their own opinions to discuss them with others, and find ways to help people who struggle due to the unfair and exclusive laws. Similarly, Thoreau believes that a corporation of “conscientious men is a corporation with a conscience” (Thoreau 2). Governments with people who can think for themselves and form their own opinions can rule justly.

Read More
897 Words | 4 Pages

Henry David Thoreau’s Civil Disobedience heavily criticizes the government for being too corrupt and also argues that the people have the right to refuse allegiance to the State. Because the government is unjust and corrupt, Thoreau calls for a change in how the government operates rather than abolishing the government entirely. Thoreau’s idea of a better government is a government that governs the least. This claim is elaborated as Thoreau states in his essay that the individuals with consciences should rule instead of the government officials that lack said consciences. For example, in part 1 paragraph 4, he mocks individuals such as soldiers and privates for showing respect to the government through marching admirably because they are going

Read More
775 Words | 4 Pages

Speaker: The speaker of “Civil Disobedience” is Henry David Thoreau, who was one of the most influential transcendentalists of his time. Thoreau was a inverate abolitionist, as well as a naturalist, which is evident in one of his most widely recognized works Walden. Thoreau believed that all men should be equal, notice I said men, and that we need to go back to our naturalistic roots/ characteristics. Even though he lived in a time we now consider as generally simplistic we also need to take into account that he also was living through the time of mass industrialization. Occasion: “Civil Disobedience” was originally part of a series of lectures that Thoreau gave at the Concord Lyceum in 1848.The lyceum movement was multiple organizations sponsoring communal programs, which thrived before and after the Civil War.

Read More
422 Words | 2 Pages

Throughout history there have been many political changes that are either supported, or not, by citizens. In the given passage from, "Civil Disobedience," by Thoreau, a perspective of disagreeing with the government ways, is provided. Thoreau explains how a government should be in comparison to how it really is by utilizing his words to set the tone and mode, imagery to achieve his audience's understanding, and diction to make his writing scholarly. Although tone and mode are not directly stated, you can infer that Thoreau meant for his writing to be taken as serious and powerful. His implementation of words such as, "inexpedient," "execute," " integrity," and "command," makes one think about their lawful rights and reflect on what rights are supported or

Read More
1350 Words | 6 Pages

3rd Quote that supports the Topic Sentence: “The authority of government, even such as I am willing to submit to- for I will cheerfully obey those who know and can do better than I, and in many things even those who neither know nor can do so well- is still an impure one: to be strictly just, it must have the sanction and consent of the governed. It can have no pure right over my person and property but what I concede to it.” (13) EXPLANATION of 3rd Quote: Thoreau will listen to the government as long as it is just to everyone. It cannot have any right over his body and property, but what he surrenders to it. INTRO TO Research That Supports/Helps Explain

Read More
1845 Words | 8 Pages

Civil Disobedience Compare and Contrast Henry Thoreau and Martin Luther King both wrote persuasive discussions that oppose many ideals and make a justification of their cause, being both central to their argument. While the similarity is obvious, the two essays, Civil Disobedience by Thoreau and Letter from a Birmingham Jail by Martin Luther King Jr. do have some similarities. King tries persuading white, southern clergymen that segregation is an evil, unfair law that ought to defeat by use of agitation of direct protesting. Thoreau, on the other hand, writes to a broader, non-addressed audience, and focuses more on the state itself. He further accepts it at its current state, in regard to the battle with Mexico and the institution of slavery.

Read More
897 Words | 4 Pages

He objected the injustices of war and slavery, and practiced civil disobedience in his daily life. In the time of Thoreau writing Civil Disobedience, many people believed revolution against the government had not been necessary since the time of the American Revolution. However, Thoreau believes that resisting an abusive government is especially important at this point in time considering that, "a sixth of the population of a nation which has undertaken to be the refuge of liberty are slaves, and a whole country is unjustly overrun and conquered by a foreign army, and subjected to military law." According to Thoreau, it is the duty of American citizens to promptly revolutionize against slavery and the Mexican-American War, which have both been supported by the corrupted American

Read More
907 Words | 4 Pages

Thoreau, knowing the widely accepted value of justice, says "If the injustice is part of the necessary friction of the machine of government, let it go, let it go; perchance it will wear smooth - certainly the machine will wear out. If the injustice has a spring, or a pulley, or a rope, or a crank, exclusively for itself, then perhaps you may consider whether the remedy will not be worse than the evil; but if it is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then, I say, break the law. Let your life be a counter friction to stop the machine. " His goal here is to inspire individuals to break unjust laws, to ultimately achieve the perfect idea of a government. By convincing his audience that civil disobedience is ethically and morally right, he achieves that goal.

Read More
1290 Words | 6 Pages

These reasons will prevent anarchy because one has a conscience to determine which laws to follow and which ones do not; therefore, one shows loyalty to the authority of law and also loyalty to one’s

Read More
801 Words | 4 Pages

Thoreau was strongly against any violent act of protest, but should a person disagree with his/her government, Thoreau would encourage that person to do so in a peaceful manner. Civil disobedience serves the purpose of giving the people a say. For example, Thoreau stated, “Let every man make known what kind of government would command his respect, and that will be one step toward attaining it“ (Civil

Read More
1198 Words | 5 Pages

What Thoreau means by the Civil Disobedience is that every person should be govern more by his own moral compass that gives him much clearer answer to his deeds, rather than some laws of a government. “Must the citizen ever for a moment, or in the least degree, resign his conscience to the legislator? Why has every man a conscience, then? I think we should be men first, and subjects afterward.” (1)

Read More
1660 Words | 7 Pages

Civil disobedience is the deliberate action against an unjust law to invoke a positive change in government and society. Civilians have the right to refute these types of unjust laws to eliminate inequality and government’s unjust nature by following conscience before laws for moral guidance. As demonstrated in Antigone, this is depicted by the daughter of Oedipus, who disobeys Creon’s law for the greater good because of the laws unjust nature. In Civil Disobedience by Henry David Thoreau, a naturalist, promotes this concept as well through his philosophical standpoint of the flaws of the government. Lastly, in Dr. King’s letter he qualifies the idea of civilians disobeying their government through non violent campaigns to stand up against

Read More
658 Words | 3 Pages

This citation shows that Thoreau did not want to follow the laws. Thoreau also believed in living life by following moral law and not law stated in the constitution. Thoreau also believed that the government does best if it does not rule over the people. In the essay Civil Disobedience it says “That government is best which governs least”. This shows what Thoreau felt the government should not do.

Read More

More about Civil Obedience As Depicted In Plato's Dialogue 'Crito'

Related Topics

Open Document