ipl-logo

Civil War Vs Agriculture Essay

1510 Words7 Pages

The American Civil War: Industry vs. Agriculture The American Civil War was caused by a disagreement between the North and South on slavery due to the North’s advance in industrialization, while the South was still clinging to an agrarian based culture. The types of events that led up to the American Civil War were driven by the differing opinions of the North and the South. These events included speeches and protests, and also taking sides based on the level of industrialization. Northerners were more comfortable with the abolishment of slavery because they were more advanced in industry while the southerners relied on agriculture. The Emancipation Proclamation was a key event, in the proclamation …show more content…

The way the plea for abolition affected the economy in the North versus the South was vastly different. In the North it would not really disturb their ideal advance in industrialism but in the South however, they believed it would wreck their whole economic system. Morally most northerners were against slavery because of their early english origins while southerners did not see a problem with it because of their differing origins and agriculturalism stemming back from barbadian ideas(Hewitt and Lawson). The push for abolition from the North angered the South and further caused their want for secession. The South wanted to split the country while Northern politics wanted to unite it and abolish slavery. A key reason for the South’s want to split was the idea of emancipation, it angered them immensely especially when coming from such an influential figure. Secession was very controversial because the North wanted to unite the country while the South wanted to secede. This brought new political actions having to do with proposed …show more content…

This however is false, because Abraham Lincoln was not the sole person who freed the slaves, it would have happened anyway. As Freedom’s Martyr highlights, “Lincoln was the great emancipator, but he shared the era’s racial prejudices, and even after the war started thought that blacks should be shipped out of the country once they were freed”(Reynolds). The slaves freed themselves, the North just agreed to it and decided to help take action because they did not believe in slavery due to their location and industrialization. In the same way, the South would have always been against abolishing slavery because of the important role it had played in their economy, the North would have been equally against it because of their beliefs and the fact that they were not dependent on

Show More
Related
390 Words | 2 Pages

Slavery has been apart of America’s economy for many years. Back then the United States was considered the Union. The South had an agricultural economy. The North had industrial economy. Northerners were against slavery.

Read More
233 Words | 1 Pages

Based upon superficial analysis of the Civil War, one would get the impression that the election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860 and the Emancipation Proclamation further incited the tensions between the North and South that contributed to the formation of the Southern Confederate States of America. The first point that stood out to me, contradicts the popular belief that the Civil War was caused by radical opposing views of slavery. A.K. McClure’s address highlights the ideology of both, the North and South, was rooted in rational principles. In addition, he discusses the opposing political views between George Washington and Thomas Jefferson.

Read More
581 Words | 3 Pages

Because of the two contrasting economies and lifestyles, abolition was a hot mess to debate. While many Southerners agreed that the notion of slavery was a wrong one, they were unwilling to give up the empire they had built on the backs of their slaves. This meant that congress had its hands full trying to appease the two sides- the one,

Read More
459 Words | 2 Pages

In the year 1863, as the nation approached its third year of the civil war, Abraham Lincoln issued two executive orders. On January 1st, 1863, he issued the Emancipation Proclamation and on March 3rd 1863 he suspended Habeas Corpus in the entire North territories. Both directives were closely related with the ongoing civil war. As Milkis and Nelson write in their book “The American Presidency”…” Lincoln was no abolitionist. Indeed, his relative moderation on the slavery issue helped him wrest his party’s 1860 presidential nomination away from the avowedly pro-emancipation William H. Seward…”

Read More
661 Words | 3 Pages

The first main cause of the Civil War was economic differences between the Northern and Southern states. During the first few decades of the 19th century, the North had an industrial revolution that brought an economy that relied on laborers. While at the same time, the South continued to rely on slaves for their farming and the production of cotton. The Northerners did not need slaves for their economy, but the Southerners could not make any profit without cotton or slaves. In the 1860’s, the North had twice as many railroads as the South, and the South had a bigger cotton production because of their slave population (Document A).

Read More
924 Words | 4 Pages

Over time, the South had developed different values than the North ,always operating as a separate system. This led to the south’s separation from the North. It began with the secession of South Carolina. Being around the time of the second great awakening, people begin

Read More
1090 Words | 5 Pages

It was the late 1850’s, early 1860’s and the United States was experiencing a great divide between both the North and the South which eventually led to the start of the Civil War. One may ask why the rift existed between the states and it can simply be explained in just a few key points. Economic and social factors were a large contributor. The cotton industry in the south was booming with the invention of the cotton gin which in turn caused an increased need for slaves making the south a one crop economy.

Read More
1309 Words | 6 Pages

Over time, tensions grew over many debatable topics, honing in on slavery. Slavery truly separated the North and South, and bumps along the road, such as politics and control of military property, caused the South to secede. After forming an aggressive territorial Confederacy,

Read More
837 Words | 4 Pages

Those is the south wanted to keep slavery as a way of making their money. The north primarily just wanted slavery gone. However, there were many standpoints all over America. Some believed that slavery should be abolished quickly whole others believed they should put an end to new slavery and let it die out on its own. There were other opinions on what should be done about slavery but one that was possibly the most fearsome for some was that some new states could now choose if they were or were not a slave state.

Read More
523 Words | 3 Pages

The Civil War was one of the deadliest wars that the United States has been a part of. As most people know, it was a battle for slavery between the North and the South, but there were different issues besides slavery that ignited the four-year long war. In the time leading up to the Civil War there was a big economical difference between the North and South. The North began to develop through a more industrial path with a plethora of factories that popped up all over the north. In contrast, the South remained an agricultural scene in which slaves would work in cotton and tobacco

Read More
1820 Words | 8 Pages

In the early 19th Century, the United States were divided over the issue of slavery. The majority of northern states wanted to stop its expansion or even abolish it, while the southern states wanted the opposite, as slavery was the most important factor in the southern economy. Eventually, the country broke into civil war over the issue. The American Civil War was a direct result of the building tension between the North and South due to lack of compromise and the difficulty of interpretation of the United States Constitution.

Read More
1650 Words | 7 Pages

The North advocated for the abolition of the institution of slavery whereas Southern States vehemently opposed this proposal (Burton, 2011). This opposition was attributable to the fact that Southern States heavily relied on slave labor to support its expansive agricultural sector. The slaves were of African American descent. In sharp contrast with the Northern States the

Read More
1451 Words | 6 Pages

‘Slavery was the root cause of secession’. ‘November 6 1860, Lincoln was elected president of America which resulted in panic emerging in the South’ . The election of Lincoln as president who was a Republican leader meant that ideologies, movements and values from the North would be implemented in the South which meant the abolition of slavery. Slavery was a huge characteristic of the South as the economy; politics; social status and psychological mind-sets were influenced by the process of slavery. The southern white population then derived the idea of secession which meant the South would gain independence from Northern aggression .

Read More
1159 Words | 5 Pages

There were three main causes of the civil war including slavery, sectionalism and secession. Slavery was a huge part of it and it led to the Missouri Compromise where any states below the border would be slave states and the anything north of that was free states. (Mrs. Wise) "The south feared the declaration of freedom for the slaves by government leaders in the North." Next, sectionalism. Sectionalism-

Read More
574 Words | 3 Pages

One of the several factors that helped cause the Civil War was the economy at the time. While the economy wasn’t in bad shape, the North and South were different and had very different views and ideas about their futures. The Northern area couldn 't have huge farms like the South. However, they were very diverse in the items they wanted to produce.

Read More

More about Civil War Vs Agriculture Essay

Open Document