ipl-logo

Clarence Gideon's Trial

843 Words4 Pages

Clarence Earl Gideon, the criminal, a hero for the criminals in the future. Gideon showed up to court without an attorney and requested to have one appointed to him as soon as possible. He was not appointed one and had to represent himself. Gideon was charged with a felony by Florida State Court for vandalism and intent to commit a misdemeanor offense. He broke into a poolroom for money, had a little too much fun, vandalized a statue or two and got caught.
On January 15, 1963, Clarence Gideon showed up to court without an attorney and expected the court to appoint one for him because he didn’t have the money to afford one. The Florida Supreme Court refused. The Florida State laws state that they appoint criminals who cannot afford an attorney …show more content…

Even with his efforts, the jury still found Gideon guilty. He was sentenced to five years in prison. While in jail, in the library he researched about the Sixth Amendment, how the defendants should have the right to an attorney even when they cannot afford one and the law.. To try and change that, Gideon petitioned a habeas corpus. A habeas corpus is a writ requiring a person under arrest to be brought before a judge or into court to secure the person’s release unless lawful grounds are shown for their detention. The Florida Supreme Court still denied his petition. He then wrote a letter to the United States Supreme Court and they finally agreed to his petition and would possibly reconsider the decision made by the Betts and Brady Case. Betts was convicted of robbery in Maryland at their Supreme Court. He, also, could not afford to hire a lawyer and asked the court to appoint him one. The Court denied and Betts pleaded not guilty,and then was later found guilty by the judge and sentenced to eight years in prison. He too sought release from a habeas corpus and denied once again. They did not find it violating any part of the Fourteenth Amendment at the time, "appointment of counsel is a not a fundamental right, essential to a fair trial." This is what made them refuse the plea of the Sixth

Show More
Related

Gideon V. Negligence Case Study

1232 Words | 5 Pages

Trial was scheduled two months later, and Clarence was unprepared (David J Shestokas par 12). This was due to the fact that he was unable to afford a lawyer (David J Shestokas par 12). Logically, Clarence

Read More

Case Brief Of Gideon Vs Wainright

816 Words | 4 Pages

There he filed for suit agains the Secretary of the Florida Division of Corrections, who at the time was H. G. Cochran. Cochran retired and was replace by Louie Lee Wainright before the case was heard by the Supreme Court. Having studied in the prison library, Gideon argued in his appeal that he was denied council, and therefore his Sixth Amendment rights, as applied to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment, were violated. Issue: Whether the Sixth Amendment constitutional requirement that indigent defendants be appointed counsel

Read More

Summary Of Gideon's Trumpet By Anthony Lewis

770 Words | 4 Pages

While in prison, he wrote to the U.S. Supreme Court complaining that his constitutional rights had been violated. The Supreme Court agreed to hear his case, and appointed future Supreme Court Justice Abe Fortas as his representative. The Court subsequently ruled that the Fourteenth Amendment guarantee of equal protection under the law requires that indigent defendants be provided with counsel, and this ruling became the basis for the right to counsel that exists

Read More

Summary Of The Supreme Court Case Of Gideon V. Wainwright

1023 Words | 5 Pages

The verdict in Betts v. Brady was that indigent defendants in non-capital state cases were only obligated to be provided with counsel in special

Read More

Summary Of Gideon's Trumpet By Anthony Lewis

1571 Words | 7 Pages

The court refused, to which Gideon replied with the claim that the Supreme Court had ruled that all citizens being tried for a felony crime should have aid of counsel. The court ignored the defendants plea, and he was subsequently convicted. Gideon filed a habeas corpus petition to the Florida Supreme Court, which was also rejected. In Gideon's petition to the Supreme Court, found on page eight of the book, he claims that the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, stating that, "[n]o state shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law," was violated when the trial court denied Gideon's request for an attorney (Lewis). Although Gideon mentioned a right to counsel roughly six times in his plea, he never mentioned Betts v. Brady (1942).

Read More

The Supreme Court Case: Gideon V. Wainwright

1659 Words | 7 Pages

On August 4, 1961 Clarence Earl Gideon was arrested for stealing money and drinks from a pool house in Florida. When he was arrested he was tried for his crimes. The 6th amendment states that if a defendant is too poor to provide a lawyer than he should be provided one by the Court, but Gideon was not given a lawyer. He was not given a lawyer because it says in the Florida law that lawyers are only provided in big felonies, not misdemeanors. So Gideon should have been provided a lawyer and was not.

Read More

The Guilty Of Clarence Earl Gideon's Trial

266 Words | 2 Pages

Clarence Earl Gideon was falsely accused of burglarizing a cigarette machine and jukebox inside a poolroom. When Gideon was sent to court to receive his sentence, he had no lawyer, therefore he had to defend himself. Despite his valiant efforts, Gideon was sent to 5 years in prison. While there, Gideon filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus hoping to challenge his conviction. His ability to file for a petition is a positive right, so even though he was not given a lawyer, despite his need and right to one, some of his positive rights—filing a petition—were still upheld.

Read More

Summary Of Gideon's Trumpet By Anthony Lewis

819 Words | 4 Pages

Betts vs Brady stated that the states had their own right to determine whether the person on trial deserved to have legal representation or not. Courts, during the period of Betts vs Brady, only appointed free attorneys under the terms of “special cases”. After being granted a new trial, Gideon chose a local lawyer to represent him and, within an hour, the jury found him “not guilty” of his crime. The ruling of this case went on to overturn the Betts vs Brady outline for an

Read More

Gideon's Trumpet Analysis

384 Words | 2 Pages

Gideon challenges the Florida court decision, and he decides to researched books about law to figure a way to overturn the court’s decision. Gideon makes the Due Process Law his way to fix the wrongdoing of the lower court. At the end, Gideon finally completes all the forms that he needed, and

Read More

Gideon Vs Wainwright Essay

511 Words | 3 Pages

He asked the state to justifies his case and give him the right to counsel. The Court agreed to hear the case to resolve the question of whether the right to counsel guaranteed under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution should be proposed in Gideon's court

Read More

Essay On Gideon Fifth Amendment

735 Words | 3 Pages

Because Gideon was not given a lawyer, he had no choice but to represent himself in his trial. Gideon, having no education in law, was unable to prove himself innocent and was found guilty of breaking and entering with plans to commit a misdemeanor. He was sentenced to five years in state prison, which gave him a lot of time to think and learn more about the constitution. While he was in prison, he did some studying and found that the sixth amendment of the constitution gave him the right to have effective assistance of counsel for his defense, which meant that the court had to give him an attorney because he could not provide one for himself. Another thing that Gideon did while in prison was that he filed a petition for habeas corpus claiming that the courts refusal to appoint effective assistance denied the rights given to him by the Bill of Rights.

Read More

Gideon Vs Wainwright Essay

514 Words | 3 Pages

Gideon v. Wainwright is truly an important and landmark case, because it established that states must provide counsel to indigent defendants according to the US Constitution(Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments). This is not the first case were the issue of defendants being denied counsel has surfaced. In the following cases defendants were also denied right to counsel- Betts v. Brady, 316 U.S. 455 (1942) and Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 (1938). Gideon v. Wainwright is the case that changed the criminal justice system for good, requiring that defendants be offered counsel during court trials and on appeals. This ended discrimination against the indigent defendants, people who could not afford legal counsel, and people who did not know how the legal

Read More

Rumsfeld V. Padilla Case Study

1540 Words | 7 Pages

He also argued that the president’s power as the Commander in Chief did not allow him to detain American citizens as military combatants. In addition, the congressional authorisation was not intended to allow the detention of American citizens. The detention of American citizens had been expressly forbidden when the President was authorised to use necessary and appropriate measures in the war against terror. His other argument was that the government controlled the location of his detention and the choice to transfer him should not affect his ability to file a petition for habeas corpus in New

Read More

Hebeas Corpus: The Great Writ

1496 Words | 6 Pages

As stated previously, Habeas Corpus has evolved. These days, the writ is being used as an appeal to federal courts when a prisoner feels their constitutional rights have been violated. Again, Hebeas Corpus has been dated back as far as 1305. The English

Read More

Key Constitutional Concepts By Leonore Annemore Annenberg Institute For Civics

644 Words | 3 Pages

Wainwright illustrated the importance of personal rights guaranteed by the constitution. This case began when Clarence Gideon was denied a court appointed lawyer to represent him in a petty crime case. Gideon, unable to afford his own lawyer, was unable to adequately defend himself and consequently was convicted. However, he was undeterred. Gideon then wrote a letter to the Supreme Court to overturn this conviction with the 6th Amendment as his evidence of the court’s misconduct.

Read More

More about Clarence Gideon's Trial

Related Topics

Open Document