ipl-logo

Common Good Philosophy Vs Natural Rights Essay

559 Words3 Pages

All throughout history there have been many conflicting political philosophies. There are two, however, which have gained the most recognition. These are the common good philosophy and the natural rights philosophy. Both philosophies have their own views. The natural rights philosophy, for instance, is the belief that government should only have the power that is given to them by the people. The common good philosophy, however, is the belief that the government should hold as much power as they possibly need in order to deliver the best possible outcome to their people. Both philosophies stress their own ideas, both positive and negative. The common good philosophy is the belief that man should do all that he does in order to better the life of not just himself, but the people around him. This has many good things and many bad things. One of the positives is that this will make it so that all humans are equal, and have the same opportunities, regardless of race, sex, religion, or situation. The negative, however, is the fact that no man can …show more content…

The conflict is that, while both believe in human equality, the natural rights philosophy stresses the fact that some men can excel, while the common good philosophy stresses that all men are equal in every way- socially, economically, etc. The natural rights philosophy also stresses behaviour with self-interest at heart, while the common good philosophy discourages such actions. I believe that the natural rights philosophy is far superior to the common good philosophy. I believe this because the natural rights philosophy allows people to move ahead in life and become successful, while the common good philosophy discourages that. It is necessary for people to excel, because without higher knowledge and higher achievements we would not have new inventions or new and better ways of

Show More
Related
951 Words | 4 Pages

The American colonies separated from England on July 4th, 1776 but still have similarities towards the English government. This is because the ideas of English government had influenced the creators of the United States Constitution and the extension of the United States Constitution, The United States Bill of Rights. Two major English documents which influenced the ideas within these US documents were The Massachusetts Body of Liberties and the English Bill of Rights. The Massachusetts Body of Liberties and the English Bill of Rights influenced the US Constitution and the US Bill of Rights with their views on the right to petition, the right to receive due process, and the idea of checks and balances in the government. The US constitution’s

Read More
555 Words | 3 Pages

The way the view was presented was very vague which means that the moral of the view can be challenged. Assuming that the view is carried out in vision in which I interpreted it, it does support the common good as the most intelligent should lead the community. It is to be noted that depending on the people leading, corruption may occur and thus make the view non-compatible to the common

Read More
511 Words | 3 Pages

John Locke, a 17th century philosopher from England, was a man who contained many ideas and theories on how particular civilizations should operate. John Locke philosophized “that there was an unspoken law amongst men known as “The Law of Nature” (“state of nature” Locke). The “law of nature” depicts a community in which there was only moral law. Thus the “law of nature” portrays a “state of perfect freedom where all men share their equality” (“state of nature”4). This statement basically states that “no one has power over another and are free (Locke 4)” to govern themselves accordingly.

Read More
736 Words | 3 Pages

We have a complex and intricate government system that incorporates both the natural rights philosophy and classical republicanism to create over 200 years of

Read More
81 Words | 1 Pages

Firstly, in the beginning the government was able to control everyone, but after the Enlightenment, people started to question things. Because of this, the Enlightenment encouraged people to challenge the authority, and think upon reasoning/logic. The word/phrase "common sense" was an Enlightenment idea, which inspired a man named Thomas Paine, during the Rev War. The Declaration of Independence was based on Enlightenment ideas, which were presented by John Locke. The Enlightenment supported ideals including: liberty, democracy, individualism, religious tolerance, and

Read More
318 Words | 2 Pages

MEMORANDUM FOR COL Andrew Kley SUBJECT: Information on ADP 1 a. Army Doctrine Publication (ADP) 1 is a publication prepared under the direction of the Chief of Staff and his vision for the Army. This publication outlines what the Army is, what its’ main roles are and how it accomplishes them b. The Army provides the United States with the landpower to prevent, shape, and win in the Nations war on land. They provide equipment, training, and financial assistance to partner nations to improve their abilities to secure themselves c.

Read More
775 Words | 4 Pages

In theory, people are meant to kept in check by a paramount authority for their best interest. In an excerpt from the Leviathan, Hobbes states, “...that during the time men live without a common Power to keep them all in awe, they are in that condition which is called Warre…” Government is a unifying power, an external force that placates human nature with a sense of security. Similarly, in Common Sense by Paine, “Here then is the origin and rise of government; namely, a mode rendered necessary by the inability of moral virtue to govern the world; here too is the design and end of government. Freedom and security.” Regarding the structure of government, specifically separation of powers, the Second Treatise Concerning Government, the concept of judicial, executive, and legislative branches is further explained, “First, There wants an establish’d, settled, known Law, received and allowed by common Consent to the Standard of Right and Wrong (...)

Read More
869 Words | 4 Pages

Rights is the power or privilege granted to people either by an argument among themselves or by law. Major events that occurred throughout history enabled Americans to obtain wanted rights and freedoms and set up a baseline for the formation of the United States. These gained freedoms and rights promoted life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for Americans. Events such as the American Revolution, the creation of the Bill of Rights, the Age of Expansionism, and the Civil War enabled a positive change in rights and freedoms for Americans. Rights were positively changed during the American Revolution the spread of ideas and the solidification of rights and freedom from Britain by the Declaration of Independence.

Read More
213 Words | 1 Pages

Natural rights are the 3 things people naturally should have such as life liberty and property. an example of one is the U.S Declaration of Independence, the document includes all of the natural rights, social contract is the idea that countries do what in the best interest of the government 's citizens, and the citizens give up some rights. Usually all governments follow the social contract but you can see aspects in the declaration of independence. Civic virtue is that morally right to involve citizens with the involvement of the society like voting. A examples of document that include civic virtue is the constitution in the U.S. Popular sovereignty is when citizens vote on who they want their representative to be so they are a part of the

Read More
402 Words | 2 Pages

The first few positives that I will be talking about are the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments. The 13th Amendment abolished slavery. The 14th gave anyone born in the U.S. rights

Read More
1030 Words | 5 Pages

Civil liberties are rights guaranteed to citizens in the Constitution that the government cannot interfere with, however, in the name of national security, they do. The government sometimes finds it necessary for Americans to give up some of their basic rights to keep the nation protected, but many people find this unnecessary. A law-abiding citizen’s extremely personal information should not be essential to finding terroristic threats within this society. Under no circumstances should an American citizen’s civil liberties be violated in a time of war or crisis, because those are assured rights that are most valuable to their freedom during national conflicts.

Read More
570 Words | 3 Pages

On December 9, 1948, as the United States was approaching a proposal towards the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which seemed unfair and uncompromised, first lady, Eleanor Roosevelt displayed a motivational and moving speech to allow the citizens of America to come together as one to make the best of the situation that was proposed in front of them. The analysis of the tingling speech on the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, will explore the deep rhetorical devices used to compel the audience and America, including the true purpose and background of this particular eye-opening speech. In paragraph 1, it reads, “Not every man nor every government can have what he wants in a document of this kind. There are of course particular provisions in the Declaration before us with which we are not fully satisfied.”

Read More
519 Words | 3 Pages

Though Rawls intends for his conception of rights to operate globally, Nickel’s conception is more readily compatible with trends of global interaction beyond merely a descriptive sense. Operating with a largely monadic conception of global affairs, Rawls claims that in order to respect decent foreign states’ autonomy, sanctions or other noncombatant forms of coercion are impermissible. Given the global society’s ever-deepening reticulation, allowing nations to engage in problematic (though, not morally depraved) behavior permits infringement upon neighboring states. To illustrate, most well-ordered polities are affected by and contribute to global climate change. Under the Rawlsian conception, no restrictive measures are to be taken against American refusals to implement evidence-based climate policy which not only contribute to the perpetuation of climatic aberrations,

Read More
748 Words | 3 Pages

The interest intensified during the Age of Enlightenment in the following century. Several 17th and 18th century European philosophers, especially John Locke, Thomas Paine, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, developed the concept of natural rights, the notion that people are naturally free and equal. . The Enlightenment philosophers suggested a secular social contract between the rulers and the ruled, who deprive themselves of some rights to gain security and serenity at the cost of some of their liberties. In the same time some ‘Natural rights’ preexisting the authority must be respected by the authority, i.e. the government and the State, in order to keep its legitimacy.

Read More
886 Words | 4 Pages

• Ethical Theories An ethical theory is a decision model .These theories depicts the viewpoints from which people seek guidance as they make decisions. Each theory highlights different points, different decision making style or a decision rule. Ethical theories are based on individual’s ethical ideology these theories allow a person to find an answer to an issue, to make a morally right decision or to justify a decision.

Read More

More about Common Good Philosophy Vs Natural Rights Essay

Related Topics

Open Document